Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter 2 Share on LinkedIn Share on Reddit Tell A Friend Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites
OpEdNews Op Eds

QE - Quantitative Easing or Questionable Economics?

By   Follow Me on Twitter     Message Adnan Al-Daini       (Page 1 of 1 pages)     Permalink    (# of views)   6 comments

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

Supported 2   Must Read 1   Well Said 1  
View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H4 10/11/11

Author 55822
Become a Fan
  (9 fans)
- Advertisement -

We all know QE stands for Quantitative Easing; a better description would be Questionable Economics. The Bank of England has just announced QE2, where 75bn pounds is being electronically created and pumped into the banks.   This is in addition to QE1, the 200bn pounds injected in 2009 in exchange for mainly government bonds.   The more I read about this system of finance, the more convinced I become that this is a racket that enriches the banks and endangers the real economy, with many economists arguing that it makes the current dire economic situation worse. The aim of the Bank of England is to enable the banks to lend to small businesses and entrepreneurs to create growth in the economy.   The banks failed to meet their lending targets with project Merlin, using the first 200bn Pounds. The government hopes the banks will do more this time with the additional 75bn Pounds  in their coffers.   Why they believe this has not been explained.   Why should the banks lend more to businesses if greater profits can be made elsewhere? Sir Terry Leahy, the former boss of supermarket Tesco, is quoted in the Independent saying:

"QE created an awful lot of liquidity intended for the real economy, but found a home in markets and speculators looking for quick returns."

This view is supported by a number of economists. Dhaval Joshi of BCA research in a new report, the findings of which are presented in the Guardian, argues that:

- Advertisement -

"QE1 [200bn Pounds] - combined with Bernanke's much larger US asset purchases - just handed banks lots of extra money which they used to speculate on commodities such as oil, boosting their price, pushing up inflation and making life even harder for cash-strapped consumers."

The Bank of England tells us that the initial 200bn Pounds boosted GDP by 1.5 %.   Where did this growth go, and how did it help anyone? Here is Dhaval Joshi again:

"The evidence suggests that QE cash ends up overwhelmingly in profits, thereby exacerbating already extreme income inequality and the consequent social tensions that arise from it."

- Advertisement -

The report continues:

"Real wages - adjusted for inflation - have fallen in both the US and UK, where QE has been a key tool for boosting growth. In Germany, meanwhile, where there has been no Quantitative Easing, real wages have risen. The shocking thing is, two years into an ostensible recovery, [UK] workers are actually earning less than at the depth of the recession. Real wages and salaries have fallen by 4bn Pounds. Profits are up by 11bn Pounds. The spoils of the recovery have been shared in the most unequal of ways."

QE hails from Japan, where it was used repeatedly and failed to stave off deflation and recession in the 1990's, with their recession lasting 15 years. It is somewhat bizarre that some economists concluded not that QE does not work, but that it was not used early and aggressively enough for it to work!   Follow the money might be the explanation for this conclusion.

It is clear that even if the aim of QE is realised, namely pumping money into businesses, it is not actually addressing the problem. Incomes for the many, due to depressed wages and unemployment, are barely adequate for survival, leaving very little to spend on services and goods dreamt up by those clever entrepreneurs. The real problem is the huge wealth gap that exists between the very rich and the poor that is choking demand.   QE, many economists agree, is likely to make the situation worse, resulting in a vicious circle of inequality and deprivation that threatens the cohesion of our society.


- Advertisement -

Supported 2   Must Read 1   Well Said 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Dr Adnan Al-Daini took early retirement in 2005 as a principal lecturer in Mechanical Engineering at a British University. His PhD in Mechanical Engineering is from Birmingham University, UK. He has published numerous applied scientific research (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon Share Author on Social Media   Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Libyan revolution

The Pursuit of Happiness. America, live up to the ideals of your Declaration of Independence

The Power of the Media

The Obscenity of War and Military Spending in a World of Need and Suffering

Global Warming: Doing Nothing or Very Little Is Not an Option

Education -- Heading to Mediocrity for the Many