Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 26 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

Protecting Public School Students

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)   No comments
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Carl Petersen
Become a Fan
  (6 fans)
"This requires the board to act in the interests of the 80% of Los Angeles students who attend district schools. You know, the students that you were elected to represent." - My reminder to the LAUSD Board

The following are comments presented to the LAUSD Board regarding PROP-39 co-locations:

For years the district has told communities fighting off co-locations that there was nothing that could be done to prevent them. PROP-39 was the law of the land and the LAUSD had only two choices: comply and give charter schools the space that they demanded or fight the "request" and end up in court.

The passage of AB-1505 has changed this dynamic. This legislation gives school districts more options. For example, during the authorization period, they are now allowed "to consider how the charter school would impact the community and the neighborhood schools". It cannot be argued that a neighborhood school forced to give up space used to provide special education services is not being negatively affected by a co-locating charter school. However, the board has to have the will to fight for public school students for AB-1505 to have any effect.

There are other methods for holding charter schools accountable. For example, charters can be revoked for fiscal mismanagement. Again, this requires the board to act in the interests of the 80% of Los Angeles students who attend district schools. You know, the students that you were elected to represent.

Last month I spoke to you about the WISH Charter Schools that owe the students of the LAUSD $424,326. I can't tell you if they have paid any of this debt since this time because the Charter School Division has not reported the balance of overallocation fees due to the district since January 17. Apparently, Jose Cole-Guitierrez believes the solution to the problem is not to hold charter schools accountable but to stop providing this information to the public. If, as I suspect, the charter school has not paid the money that is due, why are they being offered the entire Orville Wright campus instead of being shut down?

(Image by LAUSD)   Details   DMCA

In the same vein, Ingenium Charter Schools owed the district $947,376 on January 17. Instead of shutting down this school, the district is offering to give them space on the Woodland Hills Academy campus.

Then there are cases that are even worse. The North Valley Military Institute (NVMI) has been caught illegally charging its students to attend summer school. It violated California labor law by paying parents and students less than minimum wage so they could pay summer school fees. Yet, the district still gives them space at the Valley Oaks Center for Enriched Studies (VOCES).

It has been said that earlier this year the operations at NVMI were shut down, allegedly by the County Health Department. Was the Charter School Division aware of this shutdown? Did they investigate to find out if the students at VOCES were endangered by the conditions that led to the shutdown?

During the renewal process, nothing was said about a lawsuit pending against NVMI that alleged sexual abuse by an administrator at the charter. This suit included an allegation that the school retaliated against the parents who made these allegations. Was the Charter School Division aware of this lawsuit? I have visited NVMI and found that the staff and students intermingled with the public school community. What did the Charter School Division do to warn the parents at VOCES that an alleged sexual predator may have had contact with their children?

PROP-39 may be the law of the land, but it is not the only law governing charter schools. What will this board do to protect students at the district schools that you represent?

(Image by LAUSD)   Details   DMCA

Carl Petersen is a parent advocate for students with special education needs and public education. He is an elected member of the Northridge East Neighborhood Council and serves as the Education Chair. As a Green Party candidate in LAUSD's District 2 School Board race, he was endorsed by Network for Public Education (NPE) Action. Dr. Diane Ravitch has called him "a valiant fighter for public schools in Los Angeles." For links to his blogs, please visit Opinions are his own.

Rate It | View Ratings

Carl Petersen Social Media Pages: Facebook Page       Twitter Page       Linked In Page       Instagram Page

Carl Petersen is a parent, an advocate for students with special education needs, an elected member of the Northridge East Neighborhood Council, a member of the LAUSD's CAC, and was a Green Party candidate in LAUSD's District 2 School Board race. During the campaign, the Network for Public Education (NPE) Action endorsed him, and Dr. Diane Ravitch called him a " (more...)

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Make it a Headline When Trump Actually Tells the Truth

California Senate Candidate Alison Hartson on Education

Three Headlines That Got Buried Last Week

Bright Shiny Objects: Trump's Real Art is Diverting Attention

If Money Continues to Talk, We're Screwed

Finding Hope in Florida

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend