Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 1 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

Prop. 34: It's time for the truth

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)     (# of views)   No comments
Author 80073
Message Ana Zamora
- Advertisement -

As a lifelong death penalty activist, I appreciate Kenneth Hartman's passionate approach to the SAFE California Act to replace the death penalty with life without parole. We can eliminate the risk of executing even one innocent person in California with Proposition 34. That's why I am voting "YES" in November.

Because I care so much about Prop. 34 I have to correct some egregious errors in Mr. Hartman's article "Why I'd Vote for the SAFE California Act."

1) It is wrong to say that Prop. 34 will condemn "thousands" of Californians to life in prison with no possibility of parole. Prop. 34 simply removes the death penalty as the maximum punishment for murder in California. This means that the over 700 inmates currently sentenced to death row would remain in high-security prison with no possibility of parole. Inmates not sentenced to death would not be affected.

2) Mr. Hartman incorrectly states that the initiative expands the number of crimes for which life without parole is a possible sentence. That is simply not true.

- Advertisement -

3 ) Mr. Hartman suggests that increasing the number of people serving life without parole terms would increase the burden to taxpayers and aid the "expensive prison system." In fact, the death penalty is much more expensive than life without parole, mostly because of a mandatory double trial process, lawyers' fees and special housing and security costs. By eliminating the death penalty, we will save hundreds of millions of tax dollars. We can use these wasted dollars for our children's schools and violence prevention programs that truly work.

4) Prop. 34 uses a portion of the budget savings from replacing the death penalty for crime-solving. This means $100 million will go to the investigation of unsolved rape and murder cases. The fund is time-limited to three years.

- Advertisement -
This November, California voters will have the first chance EVER to decide between the death penalty and an alternate sentence. It is an historic opportunity that we must embrace. 
- Advertisement -

 

- Advertisement -

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   Valuable 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Ana Zamora Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Ana Zamora is Program Director at Death Penalty Focus. Ana graduated from Mills College in 2005. After graduation, Ana was hired on as the Training and Mitigation Associate at the California Appellate Project, one of the three state agencies that (more...)
 
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Prop. 34: It's time for the truth