Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 20 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEd News:
OpEdNews Op Eds   

Professor Yoo, What Have You Done?

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)   5 comments
Message Cheryl Abraham
What's the big deal anyway? Why try to get some university professor fired and disbarred just because he wrote some stuff that supports what the Bush administration is doing? So what? Besides, the man has a right to free speech doesn't he? And what about all those professors before him who have gotten fired or been threatened with losing their jobs because of their left leaning propensities "" that was unfair and unjust wasn't it? So getting Yoo fired would be just the same thing "" only it would be for his right leaning propensities. Just let Yoo do what Yoo does best: teach! Right? Wrong! And this is why:

Professor John Yoo is a paid professor at U.C. Berkeley of California and his job as professor is to teach the law and in doing so he has the serious honor and responsibility of shaping the minds of the young people who attend his classes, young people who will go on to graduate from one of our nation's most distinguished law schools. However, John Yoo, in a macabre and Machiavellian manner has proclaimed officially, publicly, and with full intent to influence and guide the most powerful leaders of this country into justifications for torture and abuse of human beings in the "war on terror". Justifications that are being used in a war that says traditional moral values, international treaties, and the rule of law can simply be dispensed with.

At Professor Yoo's direction and counsel the United States Government has systematically been subverting the law in regards to the treatment and detainment of those the U.S. has defined as "enemy combatants", and in doing so has unleashed horror and shame upon our nation and has not only been a party to the physical and mental torture of human beings, but has been a director of it. If Professor Yoo was a party to and director of the physical and mental torture of animals, would people say he was just exercising his free speech rights? Would there be anyone defending him for that?

But not only is Yoo advocating the torture and indefinite detention of human beings, he is defending his position with lies. Glenn Greenwald writes in, "One of the most reliable methods for knowing that a position is unsustainable is that its advocates must employ outright falsehoods in order to support it. In a Wall St. Journal Op-Ed today, John Yoo defends the right of the Bush administration to imprison people at Guantanamo indefinitely with no judicial review and condemns last week's Supreme Court habeas corpus ruling as "judicial imperialism of the highest order." To do so, Yoo asserts what have become the now-standard though still-blatant falsehoods on this issue."

It is incredible that a law professor, with the enormous responsibility of teaching America's future lawyers would assert that habeas corpus, a right that is fundamental to American and all other English common law derivative systems of jurisprudence. It is the ultimate lawful and peaceable remedy for adjudicating the providence of liberty's restraint, preceding even the Magna Carta in 1215, would say that a reiteration of the habeas corpus law is "judicial imperialism." At the very least this smacks of complete incompetence, at the most it is pure evil.

Carlos Villareal, Executive Director of the National Lawyers Guild San Francisco Bay area Chapter said, "John Yoo created a legal framework that would allow torture: and just like the lawyerly work that led to convictions in Altstoetter, it wasn't done as a purely academic or philosophical exercise. He created this framework to enable torturers: to give cover and help set in motion policies that would directly lead to the pain, suffering and death of prisoners held by the United States against accepted international law. This is why Yoo ought to be dismissed by Boalt, disbarred, and prosecuted for war crimes."

The aiding and abetting of a crime or crimes is NOT free speech, it is a CRIME, and that is what John Yoo has been doing: aiding and abetting the continued criminal behavior of the Bush regime, Yoo should be fired as an incompetent hack, masquerading as a professor of law, he should be disbarred, and he should be formally charged with aiding and abetting war crimes and tried in a court of law.

Should this occur Yoo will most likely make full use of his habeas corpus rights to defend himself.
Rate It | View Ratings

Cheryl Abraham Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Artist, Activist, Wife, Mother, Human Being
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The "War on Terror" is also a war on us

Why is Bush So Interested in Our Vaginas?

Invoking the Reagan Legacy ┬ľ Harmless or Insidious?

Phil Donahue's "Body of War" Movie. A Review

A Future without Impeachment Paints a Bleak Picture

John Yoo and David Addington: A Study of Contempt and Unabashed Evil

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend