Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn Share on Reddit Tell A Friend Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites
OpEdNews Op Eds

Personal About Politics: Treasury Dept's Office of Thrift Supervision Should Be Called Office of "Theft Supervision"

By       Message Cheri Cabot       (Page 1 of 2 pages)     Permalink    (# of views)   1 comment

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...)
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Author 26276
- Advertisement -
Remember, way back in July when Pasadena based IndyMac Bancorp collapsed costing taxpayers $8.9 billion? Ahhh…those were the days before we wandered into the trillions. But, I digress.

There is an agency of the United States Department of the Treasury called the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS) that is the primary regulator of federal savings associations.  In other words, a watchdog.


Congress established the Office of Thrift Supervision in 1989 after the Savings & Loan crisis. However, OTS does not receive appropriations from Congress to fund its oversight operations; instead the entire budget of the agency is paid by assessments on the institutions it regulates. See a problem with that?

- Advertisement -
It is to the benefit of the regulator to keep federal savings associations, often called federal thrifts, in business so they keep getting paid. Another problem is that thrifts can switch regulators. In other words, if a financial institution doesn’t like what the regulator is telling them to do, they just switch to a different one, preferably one that is simpatico to their way of thinking.

Former OTS director, James Gilleran, said the agency’s goal was to “allow thrifts to operate with a wide breadth of freedom from regulatory intrusion.” He wielded a chain saw at a press conference to symbolize cutting through red tape, and he consolidated exams allowing thrifts to conduct “self-evaluations of their compliance with consumer laws.”

That’s right. OTS allowed thrifts to police themselves.

- Advertisement -
When John Reich took over the reins at OTS in 2005, he too advocated a hands-off approach. He cautioned the government not to interfere with lending by thrifts  “who have demonstrated that they have the know-how to manage these products through all kinds of economic cycles.”

Apparently, Countrywide Financial, instigator of subprime mortgages, liked the idea of a wide breadth of freedom from regulation, since they switched to OTS in the spring of 2007 as their regulator, when they felt pressured by federal agents charged with overseeing them.

Countrywide was promised more flexible oversight of issues related to the bank’s mortgage lending and OTS, which depends on fees paid by banks it regulates and competes with other with other regulators to land the largest financial firms, Countrywide was a lucrative catch. It seemed like a perfect marriage for both. (Washington Post)

At about that same time, William K. Black, a senior bank regulator during the savings and loan crisis and the author of “The Best Way to Rob a Bank is to Own One,” tried to raise the alarm when he wrote for “Dollars & Sense, The Magazine for Economic Justice.”

The U.S. financial system is, once again, in crisis. Or, more precisely, twin crises—first, huge numbers of defaults among subprime mortgage borrowers, and second, massive losses for the holders of new-fangled investments comprised of bundles of loans of varying risk, including many of those subprime mortgages.

These crises should shock the nation. Our largest, most sophisticated financial institutions have followed business practices that were certain to produce massive losses—practices so imprudent, in precisely the business task (risk management) that is supposed to be their greatest expertise, that they have created a worldwide financial crisis.

- Advertisement -
As this goes to print (2007) Treasury Department officials are working with large financial institutions to cover up the scale of the growing losses.

His warnings went unheeded, and as we now know, financial institutions would start falling like dominos within a year. IndyMac was just the beginning.

Now it has come to light that last May, according to the New York Times, that the western regional director/senior regulator from the Office of Thrift Supervision, Darrell Dochow, allowed IndyMac Bank to receive $18 million from its parent company on May 9 but to book the money as having arrived on March 31, to preserve its status as “well-capitalized.”

Next Page  1  |  2


- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

Cheri is a single, freelance writer living in Southern California. She has two grown children, one in Iowa and one at Columbia University, and is the proud grandmother of two. Cheri is also a purveyor of fine coffee, warm chatter and dry (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon Share Author on Social Media   Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Old Ideas Suddenly Become New Again: Time for Another New Deal and WPA?

Personal About Politics: To Bail or Not to Bail the Big Three Auto Makers; and Paulson Just Bails.

Personal About Politics: The Upper Class Trickles Down to the Middle Class

Personal About Politics: Treasury Dept's Office of Thrift Supervision Should Be Called Office of "Theft Supervision"

Personal About Politics: Welcome to the Recession

Phantom President in Public, but Busy in the Background