Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 22 Share on Twitter 2 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 2/3/20


Author 506883
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Carmine Gorga, Ph.D.
Become a Fan
  (2 fans)

At 84, I feel like the boy who yelled, "But the Emperor has no clothes." Here is the smoking gun:

President Trump committed perjury while he took his oath of office.

If both wise Republicans and wise Democrats acquire the courage to recognize this fact, they will avoid the acute danger of letting President Trump believe he can do anything - and remain above the law.

Some Facts

Perjury is a statutory crime. This is a crime on which neither Republicans nor Democrats have focused their attention. Donald J. Trump committed perjury, he lied, when he solemnly swore to "preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."

He had already exposed us to grave dangers: During the campaign, candidate Donald J. Trump, a non-politician, asked a dangerous foe to interfere in our elections. He asked Russia to help him defeat Hillary Clinton - a woman, no less...

Once elected, he has persisted on calling on Russia, Ukraine, even China, for help to win the next 2020 election. Ukraine refused and was penalized by withholding military assistance for months.

The central issue is that - aided and abetted by willing or unwilling assistants - President Trump persists in believing that it is OK to expose to grave dangers our national security and the sacredness of our electoral system .


On July 27, 2016, Trump called on Russia to conduct a cyberattack on the American electoral system. In a videotaped plea that everyone remembers, he cried out: "Russia, if you're listening - could you find the missing 30,000 emails?"

Cyberwars are wars. Only more subtle than conventional wars. It is as if Churchill had asked Hitler to bomb London.

Five hours later, Russia delivered a first payload of email extracted (hacked) from Hillary Clinton's personal server. Parallels with the Watergate break-in are uncanny.

The difference is that Nixon did not personally order to break-in into the Watergate offices.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).


Rate It | View Ratings

Carmine Gorga, Ph.D. Social Media Pages: Facebook Page       Twitter Page       Linked In Page       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

President, The Somist Institute, 87 Middle Street
Gloucester, MA USA 01930

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

A Cascade of Errors (1517-2017)

Why Don't We Hear This Question: What Does Kim Jong-un, North Korea's Supreme Commander, Want?

Redemption of the Bully

To Pay For Health Care There Is Also The Amish Way, The American Way

Stop The Global Financial Elite Perversion Of John Maynard Keynes

What To Do If The Stock Market Crashes?

To View Comments or Join the Conversation: