Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 28 Share on Twitter 1 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 10/12/12

Panetta, "U.S. Facing Possible Cyber-Pearl Harbor", No mention of U.S. Initiating Cyberwarfare

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)   3 comments
Message Dave Lefcourt
Become a Fan
  (21 fans)




(Image by Unknown Owner)   Details   DMCA

Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, Thierry Charlier/AFP/Getty Images




Yesterday, Leon Panetta, the Defense Secretary, speaking at the Air and Space Museum in New York warned we're possibly facing a "cyber-Pearl Harbor" where "foreign computer hackers" could disrupt "the nations power grid, transportation system and financial networks" particularly from "technical advances by the nation's adversaries which officials identified as China, Russia, Iran and militant groups."

Apparently Panetta intended to "alert" (scare?) the American people with visions of another Pearl Harbor (otherwise why use the analogy). But what's most interesting about the defense secretaries comments was what he didn't say; that the U.S. and Israel are the two countries who initiated cyberwarfare, particularly against Iran's nuclear facilities (Stuxnet) specifically a computer worm that intentionally damaged Iran's computers controlling the centrifuges enriching uranium.

So now the Obama administration is concerned we may be vulnerable to "others" ability to initiate cyberwarfare against us.

Needless to say, if you are the aggressor country initiating "warfare" of any kind against another country isn't it logical that country would defend itself in a similar fashion?

The fact is, it's the same with initiating drone warfare. The U.S. and Israel are the two countries aggressively using drones in an offensive manner, Israel in attacking Hamas in Gaza and the U.S. using drones to attack in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia.

These facts are not lost on other countries that naturally are developing their own drone technology as well as cyberwarfare capabilities as a counter measure to defend themselves.

So when Panetta talks of "action to defend the nation" it's a bit hypocritical considering the U.S. has been the aggressor.  

It makes one think of the name change that occurred across the Potomac after W.W. II. The Pentagon was formerly named the "War Department." After the war it was changed to the "Defense Department" presumably intended to suggest the U.S. only engages in "defense of the country", rather than initiating pre-emptive "war" on others.

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Dave Lefcourt Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

An Ominous Foreboding, Israel vs Iran

The Evolving Populist Political Rebellion in the Arab World

A Nuclear War Would Be Insane

The Rich Get Richer, the Poor Get Poorer, While the Middle Class Gets Decimated

CIA in the Crosshairs

Iran Offers 9 Point Plan to end Nuclear Crisis, U.S. "No thanks".

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend