Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 27 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

Pandering Destroys Purpose

By       (Page 1 of 3 pages)     (# of views)   1 comment
Author 80363
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Eric Lucas
Become a Fan
  (7 fans)

Political pandering is telling a voter what they want to hear in order to solicit their vote.   It is a timeless political technique.   However, when it is done irresponsibly, without any limits, pandering directly destroys purpose.

 

The Teachings of Law School

 

It is no accident that many politicians are trained as lawyers.   At the very beginning of my law school experience I was taught an essential principle about legal argument, whether oral or in writing.   In drafting an argument we were taught that opposing briefs were to be like "two ships passing in the night."   For a long time I was confused as to what this meant.   I mean, if two people are writing about the same set of events, shouldn't there be some agreement, some overlap in their positions?   The answer to this question, according to the quote is, "No." The two positions should be presented as so diametrically opposed that you would not easily recognize them as the same event, hence, "ships passing in the night."

 

This method, called argument or persuasion, seeks to present the client's position in the best possible light. Accordingly, Squires and Rombauer, the authors of our legal writing text informed the reader that:

 

"The facts must be candidly set forth, but the writer may arrange them, phrase them, and expand or condense treatment of particular events so as to emphasize favorable facts and to diminish unfa ­vorable facts."

 

So the art of persuasion depends on skillfully emphasizing what we call the "favorable facts" and diminishing what we refer to as the "unfavorable facts."

 

Now any reader of intelligence will soon realize that this kind of factual manipulation comes very close to the border of downright factual distortion.   Some people call factual distortion "lying."   But, as you can see from the explanation, lying is not what lawyers are taught.   They are taught to manage the facts.   That this process brings one continually into the danger land of distortion is taught as merely one of the hazards of the practice of advocacy or persuasion.  

 

And these days, because of the prominence that lawyers have in our public life, even non-lawyers engage in this sometimes hazardous activity.

 

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

Must Read 2   Well Said 1   Valuable 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Eric Lucas Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Eric Z. Lucas is an alumnus of Stanford University (Creative Writing Major: 1972-1975), the University of Washington (1981: BA English Literature and Elementary Education) and Harvard Law School, J.D. 1986. Since law school he has been a public (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Black Lives Matter: The Problem of Citizenship

Create the Compassionate Society

Black Lives Matter: Voting Rights Are Not Enough

The Power of Sincerity

Redefining Citizenship Can End the War on Drugs

Demonization and Political Rhetoric