Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 8 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

Pakistan Supreme Court's attempt to destabilize government of Imran Khan

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
(# of views)   1 comment
Author 65550
Message Abdus-Sattar Ghazali
Become a Fan
  (9 fans)

Scales of Justice
Scales of Justice
(Image by megforce1)
  Details   DMCA

The Supreme Court of Pakistan Thursday (Nov 28) limited the three-year extension in the term of Chief of Army Staff General (COAS) Qamar Javed Bajwa to six months. On Wednesday (Nov. 27), a three-member court bench led by the Chief Justice Asif Saeed Khan Khosa, who retires in less than one month, suspended Prime Minister Imran Khan's August 2019 order to extend the term of General Bajwa by three years.

The Jurist Foundation

The three-judge bench of the apex court took up, on Tuesday (Nov. 27), an application seeking the withdrawal of a petition against the extension/reappointment of the army chief. The application was submitted by The Jurist Foundation, an unknown group, which had earlier challenged General Bajwa's extension/reappointment through a controversial attorney, Riaz Hanif Rahi, requesting the apex court to declare it null and void, and illegal.

When the court assembled on Tuesday, a hand-written application from the petitioner was submitted to the bench seeking withdrawal of the petition. The Chief Justice remarked that the application was not accompanied by any affidavit and it was not known if the withdrawal of the petition was voluntary. He rejected the application and took up the petition under Article 184(3) of the Constitution as it involved a question of "public importance". The court issued notices to the federal government, the defense ministry and General Bajwa, and adjourned the hearing until Wednesday.

General Bajwa was due to retire on November 29. According to a statement issued by the Prime Minister's office on November 21, the notification for his reappointment was issued on August 19, which said that he would continue to serve as COAS until November 2022.

Imran Khan's remarks about judiciary

The drama began on on November 18, when Prime Minister Imran Khan asked Chief Justice Khosa and senior judge of the Supreme Court, Justice Gulzar Ahmed, to come forward and restore public confidence in the judiciary. He said there was a perceived disparity in how the powerful and common people were treated in the country's judicial system. He added he was ready to support the judiciary to change the perception and restore public confidence in the institutions.

Two days later, on November 20, the Chief Justice issued a scathing rejoinder advising Imran Khan not to "taunt the judiciary" in any way. He implied that before 2009 judiciary was not independent when he said the judiciary is independent as a result of the 2009 lawyers' movement, and working in accordance with the law and the Constitution. He recalled that the post-2009 judiciary was the one which had convicted one prime minister [Yousaf Raza Gillani] and disqualified another [Nawaz Sharif], and was soon going to decide the high treason case against a former army chief [General Pervez Musharraf].

Justice Khosa acknowledged that in the past there was a perception that courts were only hearing cases of the powerful people while cases of the weak were not taken up. However, he added, presently around 3,100 judges and judicial magistrates in the country had decided 3.6 million cases.

First-ever suo motu notice of Chief Justice Khosa

During his 11-month term as the top judge of Pakistan, Chief Justice Khosa had not taken any suo motu notice of legal motions. This is the first-ever suo motu notice when he rejected the application to withdraw the petition challenging the extension of tenure of General Bajwa as the Chief of Army Staff.

Interestingly, the Chief Justice was against taking suo motu notice. Opposing judicial activism, he said on November 23 that the Supreme Court did not need to "jump in" by taking suo motu notice at the premature stage of a case, particularly when it is the court of last resort. If the court interfered in a case on day one, the whole process of justice would be retarded. He further said he had handled some cases in which the apex court had taken suo motu notice years ago, followed by certain directions, but later it transpired at the appeal stage that the facts of the case were entirely different.

This is the first time that Chief Justice Khosa, who was sworn in as the topmost judge on Jan 20 this year, has exercised powers under Article 184(3) [suo motu authority] just 24 days before his retirement. The order issued by the three-member bench headed by him said that the court-associate had produced before it a handwritten application statedly submitted by the petitioner [Riaz Hanif Rahi, advocate] seeking permission to withdraw the petition. The petitioner had failed to appear in person and no one else appeared on his behalf. The application received did not carry any date and was not accompanied by any affidavit.

During Justice Khosa's incumbency, there were a number of vociferous public calls to take suo motu notice of various grave incidents that caused immense nationwide uproar but he resisted them. He was also repeatedly requested to intervene when the Sahiwal massacre took place.

The Supreme Court verdict

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Rate It | View Ratings

Abdus-Sattar Ghazali Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Author and journalist. Author of Islamic Pakistan: Illusions & Reality; Islam in the Post-Cold War Era; Islam & Modernism; Islam & Muslims in the Post-9/11 America. Currently working as free lance journalist. Executive Editor of American (more...)
 
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Pakistan's first Prime Minister Liaquat Ali Khan was assassinated by America

U.S. Muslims condemn killings of American diplomats in Libya

Are we living in Orwell's 1984 Oceania surveillance state?

2001-2011: A decade of civil liberties' erosion in America -- Part One

85 percent Muslims voted for President Obama

2001-2011: A decade of civil liberties' erosion in America -- Part Two

Comments Image Post Article Comment and Rate This Article

These discussions are not moderated. We rely on users to police themselves, and flag inappropriate comments and behavior. In accordance with our Guidelines and Policies, we reserve the right to remove any post at any time for any reason, and will restrict access of registered users who repeatedly violate our terms.

  • OpEdNews welcomes lively, CIVIL discourse. Personal attacks and/or hate speech are not tolerated and may result in banning.
  • Comments should relate to the content above. Irrelevant, off-topic comments are a distraction, and will be removed.
  • By submitting this comment, you agree to all OpEdNews rules, guidelines and policies.
          

Comment Here:   


You can enter 2000 characters. To remove limit, please click here.

Please login or register. Afterwards, your comment will be published.
 

Username
Password

Forgot your password? Click here and we will send an email to the address you used when you registered.
First Name
Last Name

I am at least 16 years of age
(make sure username & password are filled in. Note that username must be an email address.)

1 people are discussing this page, with 1 comments  Post Comment


saeed Khalid

Become a Fan
Author 514744
(Member since Nov 29, 2019), 1 comments
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content

Apparently, Chief Justice Khosa's objective was to cut down the COAS and the Army to size. But it remains to be seen that how the powerful Army reacts to the drama staged by the soon outgoing Justice Khosa. It may not prove good omen for the Judiciary, army as well as the government of Prime Minister Imran Khan who has inherited the most corrupt political system of the country which faces existential threat by its extreme right-wing party ruled India. It may be recalled that in the past four army chiefs have given themselves extensions while two others were so favored by the government of the time but the judiciary did not challenge. However, now it is questioning the nitty-gritty of the extension in the term of office of General Bajwa. Why? This raises many questions.

Submitted on Saturday, Nov 30, 2019 at 3:03:11 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment