Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 40 Share on Twitter 2 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEd News:
OpEdNews Op Eds    H2'ed 9/20/18

On the Kavanaugh Nomination (as of Sept. 20, 2018)

Follow Me on Twitter     Message Steven Jonas
Become a Fan
  (20 fans)

Everyone who follows politics even lightly knows about Judge Brett Kavanaugh and his nomination to a seat on the Supreme Court of the United States. He was chosen for that slot by the far right Federalist Society and the far rightist Tom McGahn, the not-much-longer-to-be White House Counsel, who was given to Trump primarily to be the filter of Federal court nominations at all levels as well as participating in the process of choosing cabinet and sub-cabinet nominees for positions from which they can procced to tear apart Federal regulations at levels, the Bannonite "Deconstruction of the Administrative State." McGahn has been very successful in carrying out both of those tasks.

As is well-known to date, Kavanaugh has slipped through the Senate hearings by failing to answer any key questions, aided in trying to make himself a cipher by the withholding of a mountain of documents (?100,000 pages?) pertaining to his actions and activities when he worked for the G.W. Bush White House. However, one can be sure that, regardless of what he said at the hearings, he is Hard Right. He was picked because once on the Court he would vote to overturn Roe v. Wade, would like do the same for Obergefell, would be very liberal (ho, ho, ho) when it comes to granting a President dictatorial powers (that is unless he/she is a Democrat). He would be a threat to racial justice and voting rights(for other than whites) and would be pro-business when it comes to the matter of government regulation. The Washington Post listed 12 questions that Kavanaugh would not answerduring the confirmation hearings, while the People for the American Way outdid them by listing "21 Ways Kavanaugh threatens the American Way" (email of Sept. 4, 2018).

From flickr.com: Protesters against the confirmation of U.S. Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh outside the Warren E.
From flickr.com: Protesters against the confirmation of U.S. Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh outside the Warren E.
(Image by Lorie Shaull)
  Details   DMCA

But then came the shocking charge (well, to some of us it was shocking) that as a teenager, Kavanaugh (then 17, and quite drunk) had sexually assaulted an underage girl (of 15). Makes Clarence Thomas with his pubic hairs on Coke cans look like someone holding back. There has been a huge amount of commentary on this one, of course, and of this writing, on Thursday, Sept. 20, 2018, at about 6:30 PM. It is still unclear whether Dr. Baisley Ford will appear before the Senate Judiciary Committee and under what provisions. But in this space, I am going to share with you edited versions of Tweets that I posted as the process moved along (all at: https://twitter.com/tpjmagazine), plus a couple of other brief comments.

1. On Sept. 16: Some say that Susan Collins is STILL undecided on Kavanaugh. (can|AT|prochoiceamerica.orgEmail address). Susan Collins, a down-the-line Repub. when it counts for the Repub. party (and for protecting herself from a further right-wing primary challenger in 2020), who likes to pretend that she isn't, is undecided about only one thing: what is the best way to pretend that she is "still" undecided about Kavanaugh.

2. After the original confidential letter from Dr. Baisley Ford to Sen. Diane Feinstein, in which she asked the Senator to keep her name hidden, became public, and Judge Kavanaugh denied that anything like what Dr. Ford claimed had happened could possibly have, I had this to say in a Tweet about who is telling the truth (Sept. 18):

There three possibilities here: Dr. Ford is telling the truth, and Judge Kavanaugh is lying. Judge Kavanaugh is telling the truth and Dr. Ford is lying. Dr. Ford is telling the truth, but Judge Kavanaugh, known in his high school year-book as "100 keg Kavanaugh," (that is before the senior year started, he pledged to drink 100 kegs beer during it), was so drunk at the time that, doesn't remember incident at all.

3. Then also on Sept. 18:

IF Kavanaugh did this, is it logical to assume that that was the only time, in a drunken stupor, he attacked a girl who then felt that she was going to be raped? Or does one have to wonder, as in the [Justice] Clarence Thomas/Anita Hill case, how many others are there out there.

4. And then on Sept. 19, I was going to Tweet on this one, but never did get around to it.

"On Monday, Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT) said that he didn't believe Donald Trump's Supreme Court Nominee Brett Kavanaugh intentionally tried to rape Christine Ford when they were both teenagers. However, the Senator also tried to downplay the significance of the allegations being true.

Senator Orrin Hatch (R-Utah).  Ah yes.  There's the holier-than-thou look.
Senator Orrin Hatch (R-Utah). Ah yes. There's the holier-than-thou look.
(Image by Michael.Jolley)
  Details   DMCA

"'NBC News' Leigh Ann Caldwell reports that Hatch said that he had spoken with Kavanaugh and the nominee came across to him as 'honest' and 'straightforward' as he denied Ford's accusations. Hatch also reportedly said that 'there's some question whether she's mixed up' in her recollections of the alleged incident."

Ah yes, ever the holier-than-thou Mormon, except when it is politically inconvenient to be one.

5. Then today (Sept. 20; in [an expanded] Tweet):

What few are asking is just why the Repubs. don't want the FBI investigating Dr. Ford's charges? Although they are claiming "time" and "delay" as factors in not ordering the investigation, it is useful to recall that a follow-up investigation in the Clarence Thomas/Anita Hill case, ordered by no less than President George H. W. Bush, took all of three days. There are, rather, two real factors here. First of all, they are very afraid of (?know?) what the FBI would find, not only about Dr. Ford's charges, but possibly about others. Really folks. If there's no there there, why did Judge Kavanaugh. spend 9 hrs. at the White House right after Dr. Ford's charge first became public and some more hours since? If there is nothing to talk about, what was all the talk about?

6. Finally, also not part of an SJ tweet, there is the primary factor in the Repubs.' absolute determination to rush to judgement on the judge, regardless of what the facts may be, as many have noted. If Kavanaugh is turned down, even with McConnell twisting the Senate rules into knots in order to serve his political purposes, as he has done so often, there would not be time to get a second nominee through the vetting process and before the Senate before the mid-terms. Supposing the Democrats win the Senate. Then, oh my. The new Majority Leader, Sen. Chuck Schumer, might (might? He would be run out of town on a rail by VERY angry Dem. Rank-and-filers if he didn't) just invoke the McConnell rule on considering Supreme Court nominees from the President of the other party (actually that rule was applied to all late-term Obama judicial nominees), and the position would remain empty until 2021.

Ah yes, then the Repubs. would certainly be reaping what they have sown. (Well, we can wish for it, can we not?)

Addendum I: After I originally posted this piece, came across the wire a notice that 11 Repub. men on the Senate Judiciary Committee are looking for a female lawyer to lead the questioning of Dr. Ford for them. I've got a suggestion for them: Jeanine Pirro, that calm (sic), reasoned (sic), rational (sic) voice so often appearing with Sean Hannity, reading the same script over-and-over again about how it's time for the President to fire Bob Mueller. After all, showing the careful lawyer in her, it was she, joining Lou Dobbs and Hannity himself in advising the President to declassify (selectively of course) those top secret documents from the Russia probe which could give Trump's own lawyers a direct line into how Mueller is approaching the President on issues from conspiracy to collude to obstruction of justice. Pirro. Just the kind of cool head who would fit right in with all those Repubs. who just want to make Prof. Ford and her story go away.

Addendum II: If you really want to know just why the Repubs are pushing so hard to get this nomination through, just read this justification of Kavanaugh's behavior, if he "did it," and "whether or not he did it" by Franklin Graham (Billy's son), one of the hardest of the Hard Christian Right's most important and powerful leaders: https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/9/19/1797143/-Graham-Attempted-rape-not-a-crime-Kavanaugh-respected-his-victim-by-not-finishing. Oh my, folks. Yes indeed, if the Repubs are to have any hope of staying up there in US politics, they just have to have these guys on board. And he is a "Churchman."

Addendum III: The Religious Right has made it clear that it will abandon the Repubs. if Kavanaugh is not confirmed. But wait. I thought that Kavanaugh had told the Judiciary Committee that he hadn't made up his mind on such issues as criminalizing religious/non-religious beliefs as to when life begins, and prohibiting same-sex marriage by law. Who's fooling whom?

(Article changed on September 21, 2018 at 01:32)

(Article changed on September 21, 2018 at 16:10)

Must Read 1   Valuable 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Steven Jonas Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Steven Jonas, MD, MPH, MS is a Professor Emeritus of Preventive Medicine at StonyBrookMedicine (NY) and author/co-author/editor/co-editor of over 35 books. In addition to his position on OpEdNews as a ├ éČ┼"Trusted Author,├ éČ Ł he is a Senior (more...)
 
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Pope Francis and Change in the Roman Catholic Church

Limbaugh, Santorum, Sex, and the Origins of the Roman Catholic Church

The "Irrepressible Conflict" and the Coming Second Civil War

Gay Marriage and the Constitution

The Republican Party and the Separation of Church and State: Change Does Happen

What the Gunners Want: What's in Rick Perry's Pocket, Unlimited

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend