Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 32 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H4'ed 9/21/15

On Political Religion at the Jewish New Year

Follow Me on Twitter     Message Steven Jonas
Become a Fan
  (20 fans)

Reprinted from Greanville Post

St. Bartholomew's Day Massacre: The blood of Huguenots soaked the streets of Paris. In this famous painting, Catherine de Medici surveys the result of her treachery. Religious wars--often underscored by power rivalries between nations, and the subterranea
St. Bartholomew's Day Massacre: The blood of Huguenots soaked the streets of Paris. In this famous painting, Catherine de Medici surveys the result of her treachery. Religious wars--often underscored by power rivalries between nations, and the subterranea
(Image by (Francois Dubois, Louvre))
  Details   DMCA

For Secular Humanist Jews (and I am one) Yom Kippur is not a day of atonement, as it is for theist Jews. We may well have done wrong things in the past year, but we do not regard them as "sins." "Sin" is a religious concept requiring the existence of an unknown, unknowable, and unprovable, yet somehow an all-powerful super-natural being which at some level has control over our lives or parts of them. For us, Yom Kippur, the most important day in the Jewish calendar, is a day of renewal and rededication. We reflect, we restore, we renew -- we look ahead, not behind. And this year, in dealing with religion, I am determined to continue dealing with the political uses of religion, a major danger to all persons in many parts of the world, most especially right now, in different ways in the Middle East and the United States. In this particular column I am returning to some thoughts that I shared with my readers two years ago, as referenced below.

Two years ago, it happens that Pope Francis, the leader of the largest single religious organization in the world, made it clear that he does not have a problem with atheists, per se. And so, I would like to make it clear that I do not have a problem with theists, per se. Yes, I do understand and agree with all of the arguments against the existence of an unknown, unknowable and unprovable "God" or "Gods" (think Hinduism, of which there are about 1 billion adherents). But I do think that it is a waste of time to argue against the concept, and worse to make fun of a set of beliefs that a majority of the world's population who are theists of one sort or another hold to.

Desiderius Erasmus of Rotterdam. Erasmus was a Catholic priest, a profession he embraced out of poverty, very much like disadvantaged youth do these days when they sign up for a hitch with the American
Desiderius Erasmus of Rotterdam. Erasmus was a Catholic priest, a profession he embraced out of poverty, very much like disadvantaged youth do these days when they sign up for a hitch with the American 'volunteer' military.
(Image by (Painted by Hans Holbein, the younger, 1522))
  Details   DMCA

The struggle of humanists and believers alike who are devoted to the fundamental interests of humanity in my view must be focused not on each other but on our common enemy: those forces who use religion to advance their own political and economic interests to arrogate to themselves and their patrons resources and the products of economic activity that neither benefit humanity as a whole nor have anything to do with religion. These economic forms of course are known variously as "corporatism," the "global economy [privately held]," and capitalism. The problem, for atheists/humanists and, at many times in history theists of one sort confronting theists of another sort as well, is Organized Religion, like the historical Catholic Church, like the present Republican Religious Right (political by definition), like political Islam exemplified today by ISIS, like indeed political Orthodox Judaism in modern Israel. In my view, our argument is not, or should not be, with belief and the believers who want to do nothing other than believe and act on those beliefs to manage their own lives.

Further, it must be understood by all that over the centuries of human civilization, more of our brethren have been killed in religious wars, or wars waged for "religious" reasons, or in wars in which organized religions have been an ally of one or more of the warring states, than for all of the other causes put together. Even in the Second World War, hardly a religious war in the sense that the Crusades or Catholic/Protestant wars of 16th and 17th century Europe were, on the belt buckle of every German Wehrmacht soldier was the slogan (originated by the Prussian Chancellor Otto von Bismarck in the 1880s) "Gott mit Uns." The traditional Japanese religion of ancestor worship, Shinto, was mobilized by the fascist leadership to help them mobilize the whole population behind the war effort. The Catholic Church was closely allied with both Benito Mussolini's (Italian) and Francisco Franco's (Spanish) fascist states. In the United States, it was not like that, but there were the frequent imprecations to God for support in battle and even a popular song that I remember well from my youth during that conflict: "Praise the Lord and Pass the Ammunition."

Presently, as I have written recently, the US Republican Party runs in major part on the issues that are central to the Fundamentalist Christians and Jews who are central to the Republican base: homophobia, religious determinism in policy governing the outcome of pregnancy, the introduction of organized religious activity into the public schools, and in general the steady erosion of the Constitutional boundaries separating church and state. In political Islam, "Islamism" is very clear that its goal is to take full political power so that it may rule under the provisions of "Sharia Law."

Kim Davis -- Our Lady of Intolerance
Kim Davis -- Our Lady of Intolerance
(Image by Mike Licht,
  Details   DMCA

Funnily enough, many of the provisions of Sharia Law, against which the Islamophobes of the Republican Religious Right just love to rail, are strikingly similar to the law that the latter would like to impose across the United States. The central feature of both is that "religious law" (as they interpret it of course) should stand above any civil constitution. Just listen to the Repub. Dominionists in the current Repub. primaries, e.g., Rick Santorum, Mike Huckabee, Marco Rubio, and Ben Carson. For many Israelis on the Right, the whole policy that has been followed by their Right-wing governments over the years, the gradual erosion and (the hoped for) eventual expulsion (voluntary or involuntary) of the Arab population in the Occupied Territories is based on the Biblical concept of the "Land of Israel."

The current Kim Davis gay-marriage battle over whether a particular set of religious beliefs can be sanctioned by government, while penalizing others (let's say a religious gay couple who wants to get married and needs a civil license to do so), which the Repubs. want to extend to criminalizing the beliefs of any persons holding to the position that life does not begin at the moment of conception, is an extension of the same one."

Through my writing I have been fighting the forces of the Republican Religious Right for some years. The original of my current book The 15% Solution: How the Republican Religious Right took Control of the U.S., 1981-2022: A Futuristic Novel click here published in 1996. And so, what is my renewal for this, the Jewish New Year? To rededicate myself to that struggle, but to feature the line of reasoning that I have outlined above.

Our struggle is not with religion, per se, nor with its adherents, as individuals. Our struggle is most correctly with Organized Religion and how it is used to further the interests of Reaction by every government around the world that does use it in one way or another. In modern times that means to preserve and protect capitalism, with all of its present and future nefarious outcomes for all of humankind, whether theist or humanist. That is our challenge, and for the preservation of our species and indeed many others, that is the challenge we have to meet.

What is the "TDW" (To deal with) aspect of this issue? Why that's easy. The Democrats never deal with it, and let the Repubs. get away with whatever they want to in the context of politicizing and proposing to criminalize certain sets of religious beliefs.

Note: This column is based in part on my 2013 column: "A Secular Humanist Jew's Thoughts on Yom Kippur: On Atheism and Theism, and on Religion and Organized Religion," The Greanville Post.

Must Read 1   Valuable 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Steven Jonas Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Steven Jonas, MD, MPH, MS is a Professor Emeritus of Preventive Medicine at StonyBrookMedicine (NY) and author/co-author/editor/co-editor of over 35 books. In addition to his position on OpEdNews as a ├ éČ┼"Trusted Author,├ éČ Ł he is a Senior (more...)
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Pope Francis and Change in the Roman Catholic Church

Limbaugh, Santorum, Sex, and the Origins of the Roman Catholic Church

The "Irrepressible Conflict" and the Coming Second Civil War

Gay Marriage and the Constitution

The Republican Party and the Separation of Church and State: Change Does Happen

What the Gunners Want: What's in Rick Perry's Pocket, Unlimited

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend