Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 16 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 1/20/09

Obama "might not have been served at a local Restaurant"

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)   1 comment
Follow Me on Twitter     Message earl ofari hutchinson
Become a Fan
  (10 fans)
" ....a man whose father less than 60 years ago might not have been served at a local restaurant can now stand before you to take a most sacred oath." President Barack Obama's line in his inaugural speech was short, pointed and it passed too fast. But the sentiment and the message behind it were monumental. It was not solely a mild reminder that a half century ago a poor, hard core segregated and racially isolated, Washington D.C., mocked the nation's flowery claim to be the fount of democracy. Nor did Obama make the point to show just how far the nation has come to put him in the White House.

It was a painful reminder that segregation is still a fresh memory. Here's how fresh that memory is. A bare ten years before Obama was born, the ailing President of the National Association of Colored Women, Mary Church Terrell led a parade of pickets in front of several downtown Washington D.C. restaurants. Terrell demanded that the restaurants serve blacks. Terrell was hardly the first to pound on the Washington restaurant owners to drop the color barrier. The fight against the segregated restaurants had been going on for years. A federal district court finally struck down the restaurant ban in June, 1953.
The restaurant battle had much greater meaning for blacks and touched a much deeper primal anger than the other segregation fights. As rotten as the Jim Crow housing, schools, and hospitals that blacks were forced to attend, live in and get sick in, they had access to them. The restaurants were another matter. They were totally closed to blacks and this was the ultimate insult.

Blacks repeatedly hit a granite wall of resistance to opening them up. The greatest resistance of all came not just from restaurant owners but from the same Congress that Obama departed from. In the decade before the court ruling Congress could have easily passed legislation banning discrimination in public accommodations. It refused. The NAACP repeatedly demanded the ban. But Congress dominated by Southern Democrats and Northern Republican conservatives took the cue from the pithy remark by a former congressman in the 1930s who assured that Congress did not have to pass any law exempting restaurants from observing the segregation laws in force in the Capitol.
Things stayed that way until the court ruling in the 1950s. But the court ruling didn't totally mark a racial sea change in the Capitol. Schools, top city government jobs, hospitals, and housing were still segregated by law or practice. Even as the barriers of segregation fell in D.C. the 1960s, schools and housing stayed just as black, poor, and segregated as decades earlier. The private school that Obama's daughters now attend would have been slammed shut to them a few decades ago.

Obama made the Jim Crow restaurant reference in part to make the point that there has been undeniable racial progress and not just with his election. Washington D.C. is now a black run, black administered city. The suburbs surrounding the Capitol are loaded with high income black executives, white collar professionals, and businesspersons. Princes George, County is year in and year out ranked as the richest and most prestigious areas in the nation for blacks. But Washington D.C. is still a racial schizoid city. Poor blacks live in the same racial isolation that their grandparents, even their parents lived in.

While Congress has loosened the reins of control on D.C. during the past decade, it has also beaten back moves for full home rule. It was no accident that many of the black viewers that watched the inaugural speech at the gathering I attended gave head shakes and knowing nods at Obama's mention that his father (and he) couldn't have gotten past the doors at the Capitol's Jim Crow restaurants. Segregation was not just a faint memory of a distant and by gone past to many of them. It was a painful, living experience that can't or shouldn't be forgotten. Thankfully, Obama made sure of that.

Earl Ofari Hutchinson is an author and political analyst. His forthcoming book is How Obama Won (Middle Passage Press, January 2009).
Rate It | View Ratings

Earl Ofari Hutchinson Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Earl Ofari Hutchinson is a nationally acclaimed author and political analyst. He has authored ten books; his articles are published in newspapers and magazines nationally in the United States. Three of his books have been published in other (more...)
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The House is duty-bound to Bring Articles of Impeachment against Clarence Thomas

Think of the Two Decade Embarrassment of Thomas We Would Have Been Spared If We had known about Thomas's Porn Alleged Ob

Tea Party Now a Huge GOP Liability

The Awful Transformation of Bernie Sanders

Clarence Thomas Can Breathe a Sigh of Relief with Weiner Downfall

Did Race Explain Penn State's Blind Eye to Sex Scandal?

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend