Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 1 Share on Twitter 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on Reddit Tell A Friend Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites
OpEdNews Op Eds

Obama Out Not With a Bang, But a Whimper

By       Message Pepe Escobar       (Page 1 of 2 pages)     Permalink    (# of views)   11 comments

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Author 73066
Become a Fan
  (180 fans)

From Sputnik

- Advertisement -

This is the way the Obama administration ends; not with a bang, but a pathetic whimper.

Barack Obama

Queen of War Hillary "We Came, We Saw, He Died" Clinton's campaign -- fully supported by President Obama -- spent a whopping $1.2 billion and floundered ignominiously at the US presidential election. So Obama decided that the consolation "prize" is to order the "intelligence community" -- a contradiction in terms -- to conduct a "full review" of how the evil Russians handed out the Big Prize to Donald Trump.

Queen of War famously insisted throughout the campaign that "17 US intelligence agencies" confirmed Russian hacking of the Podesta emails, then slow-dripped -- Chinese torture-style -- day after day by WikiLeaks, revealing the slimy inner workings of the DNC. In fact there was no damning 17 intel agencies verdict, just a dodgy comment by further disgraced Director of National Intelligence (DNI) James Clapper offering no evidence whatsoever.

- Advertisement -

Now Amazon's Jeff Bezos' two-bit neocon-infested rag The Washington Post -- once upon a time a decent newspaper -- piles up, mouthing a sensationalist CIA spin according to which Langley has proof the Russians did maneuver to install their Manchurian, Trumpian candidate.

And this right after the same rag went the full McCarthy, promoting a long black list remix of websites/news agencies, Sputnik included, denounced as fifth columnists and/or propaganda ops. Further enhancing its already negative credibility -- constantly boosted by the neocon/neoliberalcon ravings of its editorial pages -- the Post to this day has not retracted its infantile, bogus "report."

The intersection of The New McCarthyism and the CIA at the Post couldn't be more predictable; after all, Bezos' Amazon is a major contractor with the CIA, thus configuring the Post as a key US deep state asset. So welcome to Washington's alleged newspaper of record regurgitating a US government (USG) blacklist of American and foreign journalists.

- Advertisement -

One false flag too many

As for the CIA's intel breakthrough, it amounts to the proverbial "senior US official" reassuring US public opinion that the "consensus view" of the "intelligence community" is that "individuals with connections with the Russian government" provided WikiLeaks with the Podesta emails. WikiLeaks had already debunked this narrative way back in October.

Now picture Langley hacks "secretly" briefing senators on Capitol Hill last week, breathlessly reassuring them the Russians did it. Yet even the Post's shoddy report was forced to acknowledge the proverbial "senior US official" saying "there were minor disagreements...about the agency's assessment" -- as in no solid evidence of "the Kremlin 'directing' the identified individuals to pass the Democratic emails to WikiLeaks."

So this is essentially old debunked news repackaged -- with no supporting facts -- as a powerful indictment, planted by the CIA on Washington's alleged paper of record. No wonder the Trump transition team -- under White House chief strategist Steve Bannon -- duly punctured the CIA strategic balloon; "These are the same people that said Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction." Case closed. Go back to play with your plastic toys.

Even kindergarten hopefuls know, based on the historical record, that the USG as well as the CIA are specialized in lying non-stop. Sometimes the lies are cumulative, sometimes they contradict each other. Take the sarin gas attack in Ghouta in August 2013 -- which propelled the USG to the brink of a renewed Shock and Awe on Syria.

US intel at the time was sure that Jabhat al-Nusra -- a.k.a. al-Qaeda in Syria (or "moderate rebels," according to the Beltway "consensus") -- was capable of producing sarin gas. And yet Obama insisted Bashar al-Assad had done it, thus violating Obama's silly self-proclaimed red line. Straight out of the neocons-do-Iraq playbook, Obama picked intel to justify what would have been a war on Syria.

- Advertisement -
The fact was that the sarin gas was transferred to al-Nusra under the influence of notorious Bandar Bush -- then tasked by the House of Saud to provoke regime change in Damascus by all means necessary. Bandar in fact was even more influential than the CIA; he was directly coordinating the handout of tons of cash and weaponizing to jihadists in Syria, as well as concocting false flags such as Ghouta. And all this after Obama himself had ordered, in early 2012, the CIA rat line through the Turkish-Syrian border of Libyan weapons destined to supply the "moderate rebels."

The bottom line is that Nobel Peace Prize Obama -- lying through his teeth like a lowly neocon -- had been on the brink of launching a full-scale war on Syria for a "crime" about which there was no evidence. And the lies accumulate as the Obama administration's elaborate Syrian plans flounder in the East Aleppo cauldron. This (in Arabic) is how the "moderate rebels" were expelled -- revealing, in parallel, how Damascus profited from inside intel as myriad "rebel" outfits were fighting among themselves.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Pepe Escobar is an independent geopolitical analyst. He writes for RT, Sputnik and TomDispatch, and is a frequent contributor to websites and radio and TV shows ranging from the US to East Asia. He is the former roving correspondent for Asia (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon Share Author on Social Media   Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Why Putin is driving Washington nuts

You Want War? Russia is Ready for War

Why Qatar wants to invade Syria

All aboard the New Silk Road(s)

It was Putin's missile?

Where is Prince Bandar?