Add the Litvinenko affair to the list of media
stories that are maligning Russia
in the final countdown to the Sochi Olympics.
A recent London Times headline proclaimed "There is proof Russia killed Litvinenko." But there is not one word in that headline that is true. Not one word!
The Times also reported there is proof of Russian involvement. That's not true either. Apparently the newspaper drew its conclusion from the words of coroner Sir Robert Owen. He claims to have seen government information that establishes a "prima facie case" against Russia.
But that's not the same as proof. Only a court of law can come to a final conclusion like that. The Times claim of "proof" is just another distortion of theirs. What's more, even the "prima facie case" claim is in doubt. The official record says that the government material Owen saw is a "prima facie case" only if "taken in isolation," without the context of other available information.
The Litvinenko case has now stretched out for over seven years. It's been full of complication and intrigue. But last December the coroner concluded that the matter of Russian state involvement should be removed from the scope of his inquest. Finally the witch hunt was over. But then the specious London Times story pops up as if nothing had been concluded. Why would a newspaper like the Times waste its precious space on nonsense like that? The likely answer: to kick Russia once again. It seems to be a popular sport.
There are legitimate security concerns regarding Sochi. People deserve to have accurate reportage about the situation so they can make truly informed decisions about their risks in attending. It seems to me that all the fear-mongering that's been present in the Western media isn't serving them well.