Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn Share on Reddit Tell A Friend Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites
OpEdNews Op Eds

No Apology: Syria, Interrupted (Part 2)

By   Follow Me on Twitter     Message Jim Kavanagh       (Page 1 of 8 pages)     Permalink    (# of views)   14 comments

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 3   Supported 2   Well Said 1  
View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H3 2/6/17

Author 83077
Become a Fan
  (20 fans)
- Advertisement -

Image by Nick Anderson/Houston Chronicle)   Details   DMCA

In a previous essay , I stated that Russian military help to the Syrian State was a response to a direct threat from the United States to attack Syrian armed forces, that I understood the Syrian uprising since 2011 as an instance of the ongoing program of regime change via jihiadi forces driven by the United States and its allies, and that, as a result, the Syria-Russia alliance was a necessary, legal, and legitimate defense of state sovereignty and independence that averted an impending victory of those foreign-sponsored jihadi forces. I found this interruption of imperialist chaos state destruction to be a net positive for the world, and a result I welcomed as a leftist. I'll call this the "anti-imperialist" position.

- Advertisement -

I also said that I recognized there are leftists out there committed to democracy, social justice, and anti-imperialism (excluding here obvious partisans of American exceptionalism, Zionism, and Euro-American capitalist globalism) who can disagree with my position as a matter of political analysis and judgement, but that--as I would explain in a later post--I disagreed vigorously with some of the spurious rhetorical tactics used to attack positions like mine and defend the alternative. Here's that explanation.

It's important to note that advocates of either of the opposed positions on Syria are not likely to persuade advocates of the other. Nor are the passionately-argued analyses of Americans on the internet, Twitter, and in in bookstores going to matter a whit to any of the combatants in Syria. The real point of this debate is to encourage people either to support or reject further American military intervention in Syria by their own country. (This creates a problem for the left anti-Assadist position that I'll discuss below.)

- Advertisement -

This is of pressing importance again because in an announcement that should surprise absolutely no one, President The Donald now says he "will absolutely do safe zones in Syria" just like Hillary. That didn't take long.

In doubleplusgood Americanese, of course, "Safe Zones" means American-protected safe havens for jihadi combat forces in Syrian territory, where they can regroup and re-arm, and from which they can launch new offensives to overthrow the Syrian government. Safe Zones for Syrians are those areas not occupied or under attack by jihadi fanatics--- i.e. Syria uninvaded.

As Joint Chiefs' chairman Gen. Joseph F. Dunford said back in September: enforcing "safe zones [likely] would require us to go to war against Syria and Russia," and are, as the Commander of NATO said back in 2013, "quite frankly an act of war." As Reuters reports, establishing and maintaining them "would require thousands of troops."

- Advertisement -

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8


- Advertisement -

Must Read 3   Supported 2   Well Said 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Former college professor, native and denizen of New York City. Blogging at, from a left-socialist perspective. Also publishing on Counterpunch The Greanville Post, Z, The Unz Review, and other sites around the net.

Jim Kavanagh Social Media Pages: Facebook Page       Twitter Page       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Israel's "Human Shield" Hypocrisy

The Rifle on the Wall: A Left Argument for Gun Rights

Charge of the Right Brigade: Ukraine and the Dynamics of Capitalist Insurrection

Edward Snowden, Lawrence O'Donnell, and the Failure of Fuzzy Land Thinking

The New Privateers: Civil Forfeiture, Police Piracy, and the Third-Worldization of America

Flight Club: The No-Fly List and the Authoritarian Theater of the Absurd