Power of Story Send a Tweet        
- Advertisement -
OpEdNews Op Eds

New Video Examines Racial Bias in Texas Death Penalty Case on Appeal to U.S. Supreme Court

By       Message C. Hwang       (Page 1 of 1 pages)     Permalink

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...)  Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H4 4/14/16

Author 502133
- Advertisement -

A newly edited video about Texas death-row prisoner Duane Buck has just been released, and is a must-watch for anyone following issues of racial disparity in the administration of criminal justice.

As the New York Times editorialized, Duane Buck could be executed "at least in part because he is black."

Mr. Buck's 1997 trial in Houston, Texas, was marked by exceptionally poor legal representation, as is frequently the case when the poor go on trial. Under Texas law, a defendant can be sentenced to death only if a jury finds that the defendant presents a "future danger." Mr. Buck's own attorneys inexplicably introduced a now-discredited "expert" psychologist who testified Mr. Buck was more likely to be dangerous in the future because he is black.

After hearing four separate times that Mr. Buck's race made him more likely to be dangerous--and without hearing any objection by any of the attorneys or the judge in the courtroom--the jury concluded that Mr. Buck posed a future danger and he was sentenced to death.

- Advertisement -

In the video, A Broken Promise in Texas: Race, the Death Penalty and the Duane Buck Case, important and unlikely voices call for a new, fair sentencing hearing for Mr. Buck, including former Governor Mark White, who narrates the video, and one of Mr. Buck's trial prosecutors, former Harris County Assistant District Attorney Linda Geffin.

Only the United States Supreme Court can ensure that Mr. Buck is a given a fair sentencing hearing free of racial bias. The Court should do so and give the criminal justice system a much-needed push closer to equal justice for all. As the Los Angeles Times editorialized last week:

A man was sentenced to death at least in part because of his race--a violation of his constitutional rights--and is now being denied the ability to challenge that miscarriage of justice because of bad counsel and a procedural technicality. If those don't constitute "extraordinary circumstances," then what does?


- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It


Christine Hwang is a recent graduate of American University.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon Share Author on Social Media   Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Law Prof: State Secrecy Leads To Unsafe Lethal Injection Protocols and Botched Executions

Execution drug shortage? Nope-drug companies just don't want their products used to execute people

Expediency over Science: Oklahoma's Lethal Injection Protocol Reflects a Step Backwards

PA Death Penalty: Governor Has History, and Ben Franklin, on His Side

Former Judge: Racial Bias and Error Plague PA's Death Penalty

When the Man on Death Row is Also a Victim