Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H4'ed 4/14/16

New Video Examines Racial Bias in Texas Death Penalty Case on Appeal to U.S. Supreme Court

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)     (# of views)   No comments
Author 502133
Message C. Hwang
- Advertisement -

A newly edited video about Texas death-row prisoner Duane Buck has just been released, and is a must-watch for anyone following issues of racial disparity in the administration of criminal justice.

As the New York Times editorialized, Duane Buck could be executed "at least in part because he is black."

Mr. Buck's 1997 trial in Houston, Texas, was marked by exceptionally poor legal representation, as is frequently the case when the poor go on trial. Under Texas law, a defendant can be sentenced to death only if a jury finds that the defendant presents a "future danger." Mr. Buck's own attorneys inexplicably introduced a now-discredited "expert" psychologist who testified Mr. Buck was more likely to be dangerous in the future because he is black.

After hearing four separate times that Mr. Buck's race made him more likely to be dangerous--and without hearing any objection by any of the attorneys or the judge in the courtroom--the jury concluded that Mr. Buck posed a future danger and he was sentenced to death.

- Advertisement -

In the video, A Broken Promise in Texas: Race, the Death Penalty and the Duane Buck Case, important and unlikely voices call for a new, fair sentencing hearing for Mr. Buck, including former Governor Mark White, who narrates the video, and one of Mr. Buck's trial prosecutors, former Harris County Assistant District Attorney Linda Geffin.

Only the United States Supreme Court can ensure that Mr. Buck is a given a fair sentencing hearing free of racial bias. The Court should do so and give the criminal justice system a much-needed push closer to equal justice for all. As the Los Angeles Times editorialized last week:

A man was sentenced to death at least in part because of his race--a violation of his constitutional rights--and is now being denied the ability to challenge that miscarriage of justice because of bad counsel and a procedural technicality. If those don't constitute "extraordinary circumstances," then what does?

 

- Advertisement -

Rate It | View Ratings

C. Hwang Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Christine Hwang is a recent graduate of American University.

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Law Prof: State Secrecy Leads To Unsafe Lethal Injection Protocols and Botched Executions

Execution drug shortage? Nope-drug companies just don't want their products used to execute people

Expediency over Science: Oklahoma's Lethal Injection Protocol Reflects a Step Backwards

PA Death Penalty: Governor Has History, and Ben Franklin, on His Side

Former Judge: Racial Bias and Error Plague PA's Death Penalty

When the Man on Death Row is Also a Victim