Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 10 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 11/25/19

National Popular Vote Interstate Compact - Debunking the Myths

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
(# of views)   4 comments
Author 514702
Message John Paul

The balloon drop
The balloon drop
(Image by Lorie Shaull)
  Details   DMCA

States that sign on to the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact (NPVIC) are agreeing to award all their electoral votes to the presidential candidate who gets the most votes nationwide. It will take effect when the electoral vote total of member states reaches 270, the amount needed to win the presidency. As of this writing, 15 states and the District of Columbia have signed on, totaling 196 electoral votes. Unfortunately, many have spoken out against and continue to denounce this effort, which very simply applies equal weight to every single vote for president and sees to it that the country as a whole decides the presidency, as opposed to the existing farce of the same few swing states getting all the campaign attention and wielding all the power. Here are some key myths the anti-NPVers are either blindly accepting or actively pushing in an effort to derail the NPV movement:

IT'S JUST A BUNCH OF LIBERAL WHINERS WHO ARE MAD BECAUSE HILLARY LOST!
Actually, the NPVIC effort began in 2006, long before Clinton or Trump ran for president. It has nothing to do with political retribution. It's all about every vote actually counting nationally, and the true will of the people being reflected in presidential election results.

CALIFORNIA AND NEW YORK WILL DECIDE EVERY ELECTION WITH THIS PLAN!
First of all, to accept this claim you'd have to believe that everyone in each of these states votes the same way, which is not even close to true. Registered voters in California are 43% Democrat, 23% Republican and the rest are other parties or unaffiliated. New York is roughly 60/30 Democrat to Republican with the rest unaffiliated or other parties. Secondly, with the California/New York myth you'd have to believe that two states totaling eighteen percent of the American population can swing a nationwide popular vote. I've never been accused of being a math whiz, but still pretty sure that's mathematically impossible.

THE MAJOR CITIES WILL HAVE TOO MUCH INFLUENCE!
Another hollow argument. The top five cities (New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, Houston and Philadelphia) make up just six percent of the American population. But hey, let's add up the top fifty cities just for the heck of it: Still only fifteen percent. Not nearly enough to decide an election, even if you accept the absurdity of everyone in all these cities voting the same way.

IT'S UNCONSTITUTIONAL!
Actually, the Constitution specifically leaves the designation of electors and allocation of their votes up to the states themselves. States signing on to the NPVIC are simply choosing a new way to allocate their electoral votes, as they are perfectly free to do, precisely the same way they adopted the existing "winner take all" electoral vote method via their own legislation.

IMPOSSIBLE TO IMPLEMENT! NO OFFICIAL COUNT OF NATIONAL POPULAR VOTE!
Wrong again. Existing federal law requires states to certify their popular vote count and submit it to federal officials in the form of a document called the "Certificate of Ascertainment," which is then used to award each state's electoral votes. This very same process will happen under the NPVIC, with the only difference being all of each member state's electoral votes being awarded to the candidate with the highest national popular vote total.

THE POPULAR VOTE IS WRONG! WE'RE A REPUBLIC, NOT A DEMOCRACY!
This is a distinction without a difference. We are indeed a representative republic, but Democracy is the process through which our representatives are elected. The notion that the popular vote is okay for every elective office short of the presidency but wrong for the presidency itself is just more absolute nonsense.

A POPULAR VOTE FOR PRESIDENT IS MOB RULE!
The idea of American voters deciding the presidency with every vote actually counting toward the final result is not mob rule. It's the way Democracy is supposed to work. A better argument can be made that we're living under mob rule now, with a small minority of states deciding every election while the rest of the country is ignored, and a 535 member Congress with a median net worth of more that one million dollars (and some of them MUCH higher), with no term limits, serving the interests of the one percent at the expense of the rest of us.

CONGRESS HAS TO APPROVE INTERSTATE COMPACTS!
Not when the compact (and there are more than two hundred of them currently active) does not threaten the power or supremacy of the federal government, as the Supreme Court has previously ruled. And since the Constitution specifically leaves the process of designating electors and allocating their votes up to the states themselves, the right of states to change how they allocate their electoral votes is exclusive. You cannot threaten federal power that does not exist.

WE NEED TO RESPECT AND KEEP THE SYSTEM OUR FOUNDERS CREATED!
The NPVIC does not eliminate the Electoral College. It simply changes the way electoral votes are allocated. Which, again, is perfectly legal, constitutional, and a simple result of states exercising their exclusive power to determine for themselves how their electoral votes will be awarded. Additionally, the "winner take all" electoral vote format was not debated at the Constitutional Convention, nor is it mentioned in the Constitution. It was adopted in precisely the same manner being employed to adopt the NPVIC via each state's individual legislation. This "winner take all" method of allocating electoral votes is a total bastardization of Democracy, effectively throwing tens of millions of votes for the national office of President of the United States in the trash every four years, simply because they came up on the losing side in their state. Nobody who considers themselves an upstanding American citizen should be okay with tens of millions of voters of every political stripe being so blatantly disenfranchised in presidential elections.

Finally, a March 2018 a Pew Research Center poll revealed that 55% of Americans support replacing the Electoral College with a popular vote for president. The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact accomplishes this objective without a constitutional amendment, which requires a two thirds vote of Congress and ratification by three fourths of state legislatures (38 states). And not only can an amendment be defeated by a small minority, but hundreds of amendment proposals with the goal of abolishing or altering the Electoral College have already failed. It's long past time to try another way, and with the NPVIC we're already more than 70% of the way there.

Learn more and follow the effort:

National Popular Vote website

National Popular Vote on Facebook

 

Rate It | View Ratings

John Paul Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Proud American citizen, unrestrained by any party loyalty, free to seek, speak and advance the cause of truth and reality.

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

National Popular Vote Interstate Compact - Debunking the Myths

Comments Image Post Article Comment and Rate This Article

These discussions are not moderated. We rely on users to police themselves, and flag inappropriate comments and behavior. In accordance with our Guidelines and Policies, we reserve the right to remove any post at any time for any reason, and will restrict access of registered users who repeatedly violate our terms.

  • OpEdNews welcomes lively, CIVIL discourse. Personal attacks and/or hate speech are not tolerated and may result in banning.
  • Comments should relate to the content above. Irrelevant, off-topic comments are a distraction, and will be removed.
  • By submitting this comment, you agree to all OpEdNews rules, guidelines and policies.
          

Comment Here:   


You can enter 2000 characters. To remove limit, please click here.

Please login or register. Afterwards, your comment will be published.
 

Username
Password

Forgot your password? Click here and we will send an email to the address you used when you registered.
First Name
Last Name

I am at least 16 years of age
(make sure username & password are filled in. Note that username must be an email address.)

3 people are discussing this page, with 4 comments  Post Comment


Starbuck

Become a Fan
Author 24974
(Member since Oct 24, 2008), 1 fan, 192 comments
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content

Perhaps you should look at the 2016 math again. California DID effectively flip the popular vote in 2016. Without California, Trump would have won the popular vote by a pretty good margin. Without deference to the sovereignty of states, the federal government will become even more tyrannical than it already is. That is why we have a US Senate and Electoral college. The further up the chain the power goes, the less influence the people have.

Submitted on Tuesday, Nov 26, 2019 at 6:18:41 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (1+)
Help
Indent

Anton Grambihler

Become a Fan
Author 5050
(Member since Feb 22, 2007), 1 fan, 1 articles, 1 quicklinks, 890 comments, 10 diaries
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Reply to Starbuck:   New Content

The 1913 Amendment which makes the USA Senators additional representatives of the people instead of representatives of the States selected by the State legislatures needs to be repealed.

Submitted on Tuesday, Nov 26, 2019 at 7:10:55 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (1+)
Help

John Paul

Become a Fan
Author 514702
(Member since Nov 24, 2019), 1 articles, 1 comments
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content

Starbuck - By applying equal weight to every single vote for president, the NPVIC actually greatly EXPANDS the peoples' influence. Right now we've got tens of millions across the country whose votes count for nothing nationally because they're in a reliably blue or red state where the most citizen votes gets all the electoral votes. If you want to show deference to the sovereignty of the states, recognize the fact that per the Constitution, they are free to distribute their electoral votes as they see fit.

Submitted on Tuesday, Nov 26, 2019 at 10:26:54 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
Indent

Starbuck

Become a Fan
Author 24974
(Member since Oct 24, 2008), 1 fan, 192 comments
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Reply to John Paul:   New Content

Submitted on Wednesday, Nov 27, 2019 at 2:30:44 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment