Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 12 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

NAFTA By Any Name Is Built For The Rich

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)     (# of views)   3 comments

From Our Future

Mick Mulvaney
Mick Mulvaney
(Image by Gage Skidmore)
  Details   DMCA
- Advertisement -

Mick Mulvaney, the millionaire who is President Trump's acting chief of staff and director of the Office of Management and Budget, has now awarded himself another job: spokesman for labor.

Referring to the proposed new NAFTA, he told the Wall Street Journal, "We know that labor supports it."

That, right there, is the problem with NAFTA, old and new. One percenters like Mulvaney, self-dealing corporate honchos and fancy-pants corporate lobbyists negotiated the deals. Those fat cats claimed they spoke for labor. But when they opened their mouths, only the word profit emerged.

- Advertisement -

They didn't give a damn about jobs or wages or workers' welfare. The ravages NAFTA inflicted on the non-rich prove that. The proposed new NAFTA is barely different. Mulvaney, though he tried to usurp labor's voice, is far from labor's mouthpiece. Labor speaks for itself. And it is railing against NAFTA, old and new.

The United Steelworkers (USW) union opposed NAFTA from the outset and even filed suit in an attempt to prevent it from taking effect. Like 1992 independent presidential candidate Ross Perot, the union knew NAFTA was a giant vacuum that would suck American and Canadian factories and jobs south of the Mexican border, where wages were, and remain, untenably low and environmental laws unenforced.

In the quarter century under NAFTA, more than 1 million American jobs were lost, U.S. wages stagnated and U.S. trade deficits with Mexico increased. That 1 million is a 2013 number and does not include untold thousands of U.S. jobs lost more recently at the likes of Carrier furnace, UTC electronics and Rexnord bearings factories, all in Indiana, and General Motors' Lordstown assembly plant in Ohio. Rexnord told its 350 Indianapolis workers they could keep their jobs if they'd work for Mexican wages that is, for less than U.S. minimum wage.

- Advertisement -

That's what NAFTA did: It pitted U.S. and Canadian workers earning family-supportive wages against Mexican workers subsisting on pathetic pay and mostly denied the right to form independent labor unions that would help raise those wages. At the same time, NAFTA displaced 2 million Mexican family farmers as U.S. agricultural products, sometimes subsidized, flowed tariff-free south of the border. Workers in all three countries suffered.

Corporations like Carrier and Rexnord that had perfectly profitable factories in the United States, ginned up revenues by moving to Mexico and paying workers there a pittance. The minimum wage in Mexico is $5.10 a day yes, a day for most workers and $8.79 a day for those in factories near the U.S. border. Corporations also profited by skipping off to a country that turned a blind eye toward pollution.

The promise was that a new NAFTA would fix all that, disengaging the vacuum that pulled factories south and upgrading environmental enforcement.

Some of the new provisions seem, on the surface, like they could help. The proposed deal requires that workers earning an average of $16 an hour produce 40% of car and truck parts by 2023 to get tariff-free treatment. There is some evidence, however, that this requirement may already have been met. And the auto companies have refused to release data to support the claim that this would be an important provision. It may help retain jobs in higher wage countries like the United States and Canada but is unlikely to increase wages or move jobs there.

In addition, under the proposed new deal, to be tariff-free, 75% of vehicle components would have to be produced in one of the three countries. That's significantly higher than the current 62.5% and would reduce importation of parts from countries that illegally subsidize their industries like China. But a good portion of the jobs that might result will probably be created in Mexico.

Also, while these changes may help autoworkers, they do nothing for furnace workers and those in a multitude of other industries.

- Advertisement -

More significant to preventing a new NAFTA from failing workers like the old NAFTA would be enforcement of Mexico's new labor laws. As it is now, labor unions in Mexico frequently are fakes, created and controlled by corporations. The new laws, passed in April, empower Mexicans to form their own worker-controlled labor unions that could negotiate for higher wages and exercise the right to strike without workers suffering violent attacks by authorities.

Realistically, however, free unions aren't going to pop up overnight in hundreds of thousands of Mexican workplaces. Unions must be formed, voted in and certified, then would have to successfully negotiate labor agreements at factories where owners will dig in their heels to remain in control.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

- Advertisement -

Well Said 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Leo Gerard Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Leo W. Gerard, International President of the United Steelworkers (USW - United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union) is in his second full term since being elected (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Deep and Abiding Disrespect for Teachers

The Middle Class Is So Christmas Past

China's Currency Manipulation: Flipping off America

Labor's Challenge to the New Democrats in Congress

Billionaire Wolves in Workers' Clothing

NAFTA By Any Name Is Built For The Rich

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

3 people are discussing this page, with 3 comments


Alexander Kershaw

Become a Fan
Author 500827

(Member since Nov 25, 2014), 3 fans, 372 comments
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

Article II, Section 2, Clause 2 of the Constitution states that ratified treaties are the supreme law of the land subject only to the Constitution itself. NAFTA is an agreement. The Treaty of Guadalupe-Hidalgo states that there shall be no restrictions on the passage of humans over the border and restrictions only on goods.

When the treaty was passed US businessmen had their products protected and access to cheap labor. Under NAFTA trans national corporations and their psychopathic owners still have access to cheap labor and can move goods over the border without tariffs and have access to the US market and leverage over US labor. Perfect for the .00001% not so good for the 99%.

Eliminate NAFTA and increase minimum wage to $30/hr which is the buying power of an hour of work at minimum wage in 1965 by the Hershey Bar standard. An hours work in 1965 could buy 30 Hershey Bars or 10 NY subway tokens The US is richer now and yet the minimum wage is less. Americans would do the work that immigrants do now if they were paid $30/hr so they could pay rent and buy food without living with their parents.

Submitted on Saturday, Jun 29, 2019 at 3:10:22 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

911TRUTH

Become a Fan
Author 15356

(Member since Apr 29, 2008), 26 fans, 2539 comments
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content


EVERYTHING in this country is built for the rich.

Submitted on Saturday, Jun 29, 2019 at 6:53:47 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 
Indent

kappie

Become a Fan
Author 48333

(Member since May 6, 2010), 2 fans, 612 comments
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to 911TRUTH:   New Content

a man of few words but you summed it all up

Submitted on Sunday, Jun 30, 2019 at 1:11:32 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment