Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn Share on Reddit Tell A Friend Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

My Reply to Devil's Advocate and Request for a Response

By       Message Daniel Geery       (Page 1 of 1 pages)     Permalink    (# of views)   51 comments

Related Topic(s): ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Author 1198
Become a Fan
  (72 fans)
- Advertisement -

You've basically called for the end of anonymity.
Think of the consequences of just that.

I have thought of the end of anonymity or I obviously wouldn't have posted this. What it means is that human beings who can't hide behind a mask should not be allowed to speak.

I was not thinking of you in particular to be sure, but if someone is going to express some idea they should have the balls to stand behind it and defend it.

Is there some reason as to "Why not?" Such alleged humans should be shut off from speaking or writing aloud. I say the burden is on you to answer this particular question, as much as I do appreciate the things you have to say. Now that I think about it for two seconds more, why do YOU need a mask to hide behind???

In addition, you're also saying it's actually possible to "appoint" the "experts" that would rule over this scheme. That's no different than the government saying they're going to appoint some (non-existent) qualified people to pull the plug on "fake news".

- Advertisement -

I can and I would. They would be mostly scientists, or those who approach our problems as scientists, namely getting and operating from established facts--that readers should be free to challenge, of course. Many humans have devoted their careers to studying "the facts" and also operating from genuine human values. They are easily found. I will real off a few from the top of my head: Professor Brian Cox, Stephen Hawkins, Dr. Margaret Flowers, Dr. Jill Stein, Dr. David Suzuki, the late David Brower (whose words can still be found), Buckminster Fuller (deceased, but easily found as well), David Swanson, Debbie Lusignan, Amory Lovins, Dr. Guy McPherson, and I could easily produce a list of 100 or more if you seriously want it).

It goes back to the same 1st-Amendment-related question you've often asked yourself - WHO QUALIFIES as those "experts", and WHO qualifies as the people who would appoint them?? (I'm pretty sure you've asked this before somewhere else.)

I have asked this, yes, but I have just provided a few of the answers.

- Advertisement -

My question to you, is,"Why should we allow any damn fool to put up a pseudonym, generally insane, and give them two cents of attention?"

If one does not have the balls to stand behind what they say, and defend it, fm, imvso.

As for why we should be able to check the source and challenge it, I should think this obvious. For example, I would like to challenged Netanyahu and Trump and get an answer, rather than reading what is utter bullshit.

Interestingly, right after I read your comment, my search engines were hacked and I couldn't get past that for two days of working my ass off. I get ads from utter nutcases that have control over my computer. I want not only to track the bastards down, but send them a virus that destroys their computer and gets them locked up for a decade or two. And occasionally executed, as much as I totally disapprove of the death sentence--hopefully we'll have laws preventing that.

- Advertisement -

 

- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

In my run for U.S. Senate against Utah's Orrin Hatch, I posted many progressive ideas and principles that I internalized over the years. I'm leaving that site up indefinitely, since it describes what I believe most members of our species truly (more...)
 

Daniel Geery Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Related Topic(s): ; ; , Add Tags
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

CIA Agent Confesses On Deathbed: 'We Blew Up WTC7 On 9/11'...YourNewsWire.com

Why have kids?

The Foundation of Religion Fractured, shaky, and exposed

Military Coup Has Taken Over the U.S. A., Without a Single Shot Fired