Immense propaganda has accused the US government of committing 9/11. My investigation has discovered that the US government had no involvement. It exposed to me that some organization must have financed the false accusations of the US government from which it must have profited. This uncovered to me the 9/11 conspiracy did occur but not as presented by the media. The conspirators are masters of deception and this article presents how they fooled people.
***
Nineteen Islamic extremists hijacked four airplanes and carried out suicide attacks on September 11, 2001 (9/11). Two of the planes were flown into the twin towers of the World Trade Center (WTC) in New York, a third plane hit the Pentagon in Washington, D.C., and the fourth plane crashed into a field in Pennsylvania. Almost 3,000 people were killed during the terrorist attacks.
The US government conducted and
reported on an investigation about the 9/11 terrorist attacks with the help of
The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). The findings are
presented in short here: FAQs - NIST
WTC Towers Investigation. It states that the planes' impact, fire, and the
heavy load of the buildings destroyed the WTC and the Pentagon. The US
government accused the leader of Al-Qaeda, Osama Bin Laden, for 9/11, although
they did not provide confirmatory evidence. They tried to seize Osama Bin Laden
but he was killed in the attempt, which left many important questions
unanswered. The investigation failed to offer a convincing answer to the basic
question: why did these 19 terrorists do it?
Together, the doors opened wide for conspiracy theories. A large number of
people disagree with the NIST report. They accuse the US government of destroying
the WTC by planting explosive devices in it and crushing the part of the
Pentagon with a missile. One of the leading organizations that accuse the
government is "Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth." The accusations of
these organizations are mainly presented on social networks such as Facebook
and YouTube. Their reports dominate the topic with thousands of documentaries
trying to prove the government did it. These reports are pseudoscientific so I
have to disagree with them.
If we analyze motives for the terrorist attack, the government and mainstream
US media have found it in the fact that the suicidal terrorists did not like US
values, freedom and democracy. Those are really shallow and miserable
statements with which I strongly disagree. If they were even slightly
objective, they would find a motive in the aggressive US foreign policy.
The alternative media has found the motive for the alleged government's involvement
in the demolition of the WTC in the desire to get the American people to
support the conquering of independent countries in the Middle East. The wars in
the Middle East were indeed triggered by 9/11. However, I do not see how US
government officials would be able to gain personally from the crime of
aggression on these independent countries.
While reading discussions related to 9/11 on various forums, I found the most
significant divide was between people who think the government did it and those
who do not believe it. I would say approximately half accuse the government of
9/11 and a half don't. They fiercely argue about why 9/11 happened, who had an
interest in it, and finally who did it. They were not able to find convincing
answers and an explanation to which all might agree. It triggered me to see the
truth about 9/11. I performed my investigation which gave conclusive answers to
all of the questions regarding 9/11. I am presenting my findings here.
***
The twin towers. We all saw two planes hit the twin towers. The planes' impacts critically damaged them. If the planes were twice as large, they would probably have cut the towers in two. Then the fire weakened the construction of the buildings until the huge loads of the buildings reached critical pressure, causing the crash of the towers. That was the government's explanation, with which I agree. I wrote the article A Clear Explanation Why the Twin Towers Collapsed in which I have scientifically explained how the skyscrapers crushed down. I believe it is a credible explanation.
The alternative media on social networks have accused the US government of planting explosives, which destroyed the twin towers. Thousands of reports and documentaries tried to convince people by using suggestive explanations such as the buildings could never collapse if hit by a plane, or that the explosions that destroyed the buildings were heard by many witnesses. Some of the mainstream media broadcasted or published the accusations of the alternative ones.
I would like to know why not one of these reports asked essential questions
like why anybody would try to destroy both twin towers twice at the same time
when both of the attempts are extremely difficult to realize? Where exactly
would the explosive devices be planted to demolish the buildings the way they
went down? Who might plant the explosives? How would planting the explosives
possibly go unnoticed by people who work there? Explosive experts would have to
plant the explosives exactly at the place where the planes hit the buildings or
else the collapse might start elsewhere. That means they would have to know in
advance where the jets were going to hit the buildings. This is hard to believe
even if the pilots were extremely skilled. But then if the planes hit the building
exactly where the explosives were planted, why did they not go off immediately
when the planes hit? What exactly might have triggered the presumed explosives
and how? What would determine the timing of the explosion? None of that was
questioned, analyzed, explained, or discussed, not to mention investigated,
which is way too short of a serious accusation against the government.
Here I enclosed one of many very shallow documentaries that try to prove that
explosive devices demolished the twin towers: WTC: How The
Towers Fell. Instead, it actually proves that the collapse of both
buildings was caused by the damage of the planes, fire, and the large weight of
the buildings.
The slow-motion video at 38:23 is a well-documented cheat easy to debunk. The
narrator states that the top of the building disappears in the explosion. But
no explosion is to be seen; there is no high-speed debris flying from the place
of the alleged blast. Instead, the documentary presents the implosion of the
top of the building and collapsing floors. One can see eruptions of smoke and
fire coming out from the building, but not as the result of explosions, but
under the pressure of collapsing floors. Some people believed they heard
explosions in the buildings. They were mistaken. If we throw a book on a table,
it will bang. Imagine how loud the collapse of the whole floor would bang! That
was what those people heard.
The upper part of the building started imploding floor by floor at the level
where the plane hit the building. The construction below was rigid and resisted
the collapse of nearly 10 stories (see the scale in the above-linked video)
which piled on before reaching the critical weight and the kinetic energy of
the load, which the construction below could not withstand. Then the weight of
the building hammered down floor by floor the whole building to the
foundations, almost like a free fall. Yes, the construction was sturdy but not
enough to resist the power of the falling load above. The columns below bent
and collapsed like nails hit by a big hammer to a hard surface. That is all one
needs to understand physics.
And finally, the first building to collapse was hit second by the plane. Why?
The second building was hit lower than the first one so that the load above the
plane's impact of the second building was more significant than the weight
above the first. The more massive pressure quickened the collapse of the
building hit second. That also indicates that the collapses were not triggered
by the explosion.
All talk of explosive use is devised fraud of false conspiracy creators. It
proves the documentary was created on purpose to accuse the government and
trick people.
***
The Pentagon. No camera
clearly shows the Pentagon being hit by a plane. The security cameras around
the Pentagon had a speed of one snapshot per second while the plane flew at 200
meters per second so that it escaped the camera. That opened the door to conspiracy
theorists claiming not a plane hit the Pentagon but a missile. Again thousands
of alternative media have created fake pseudoscientific reports claiming a
missile caused the Pentagon destruction. So according to these reports, the
Pentagon hit the Pentagon with a missile.
These reports did not bother to question where the missing plane was if a
missile hit the Pentagon? The attack on the Pentagon occurred at 9:45 AM.
Hundreds of people saw the plane hitting the Pentagon and not one person saw a
missile. That is the reason these reports did not bother to ask the
eyewitnesses what they saw. Even the conspiracy theory stood on extremely shaky
legs; not a seriously organized effort has been made to debunk these reports.
All these fake reports cannot cheat those who think with their heads and try to
discover the truth on their own. Some individuals fought for the fact but got
lost in a sea of fake reports. For example, Jeffrey Hill, frustrated by false
statements about the destruction of the Pentagon, conducted his own research
nine years after the incident. He searched the archive of various newspapers
trying to find the eyewitnesses statements. He found many witnesses and
interviewed them by unsolicited phone calls in which he asked them to confirm what
they saw on 9/11. After that Jeffrey Hill said: "These people did not talk
about hypotheticals based on the size of the hole in the Pentagon or the lack
of aircraft debris; they related what they saw on 9/11." Jeffrey Hill presented
the voice recordings and his analysis here: What
really happened."His conclusion was: "The Pentagon was hit by a plane, end
of story." He proved it.
The Pentagon actually collapsed the same way as the twin towers even though the
load above the impact point was much smaller. The longer time under the fire
replaced the lesser destructive power of the Pentagon weight.
***
The WTC building 7. It is the core of the conspiracy theory because the supporters of conspiracy theories stated such a building never collapsed due to fire. To them, it looked like a controlled demolition, controlled demolition, controlled demolition, repeated thousands of times in thousands of reports. In such a way the collapse of WTC building 7 has become a controlled demolition to a large number of people.
However, everything that these
reports present is wrong. Actual future events proved that high-rise buildings
do collapse in the fire. On May 13, 2008, the 13-story building of the Faculty
of Architecture, at the Delft University of Technology, Netherlands, collapsed
under fire. On 19 January 2017 the 17-story Plasco Building in Tehran, Iran,
collapsed during a skyscraper fire.
Also, one could not possibly secretly plant explosive devices in either WTC
building. First, planting explosives that can destroy the building requires a
lot of time and it cannot pass undetected by people who work there, and second,
such explosives cannot be invisible.
The collapse of WTC building 7 really looked like a controlled demolition as it
was presented in media, but that does not mean it was indeed a controlled
demolition. All these "deep analytic and scientific" documentaries about the
collapse of building 7 have "forgotten" to present that its core collapsed 7
seconds before the rest of the building. They skipped that on purpose because
this would prove that no explosive was used in the collapse of the building.
Please take a look at the following documentary: 9/11 WTC 7 Demolition -
Westside Highway CBS Camera Angle at 7:24.
No controlled demolition of any building ever happened in two parts with a
7-second delay. A camera never detected the explosion in building 7, nor did
anybody see it even though the building was under constant supervision before
the downfall.
So what happened? Building 7 was damaged by debris flying from the North WTC
twin tower. It burned almost all day after being abandoned by firefighters,
which was normal after the ruin of the twin towers. When firefighters abandoned
the burning building its collapse was just a matter of time. The whole day fire
additionally weakened the damaged steel structure of the building. The heavy
load of the building destroyed the weakest columns of the core of the building, which led to its collapse.
But why did the whole building collapse? The fire did not affect the entire
building. I am an architect and engineer and will try to explain it here in a
way everyone can understand. The collapse of the core of the building together
with the broken corner disturbed the balance of the building static causing the
horizontal pressure. As a result, the whole building twisted one second before
the collapse, which is visible in the documentary. The controlled demolition
cannot cause this twist because controlled demolitions always collapse
buildings straight down. These buildings drop, they do not twist. This twist
destroyed the building.
Steel construction is strongly resistant to axial pressures but is very weak to
bending moment stresses. Steel columns are too thin to keep resistance to big
bending forces, especially if exposed to high temperature. They act like wooden
sticks. One can easily break a stick by bending it until it snaps and that is
the only way to break it. The same happens to steel columns. When the
construction of building 7 twisted, the load of the building created big
bending moment stress to the steel columns. They bent practically without
resistance and in no time on the floor most damaged by fire. Then the building
collapsed almost in free fall as we saw. Building 7 started falling in the core
slightly ahead of the perimeters. That delay presents the horizontal speed of
the collapsing columns under the load.
So the only convincing claim of conspiracy theorists lied in the fact that the
collapse of building 7 did look like a controlled demolition; however, steel
construction buildings actually could not collapse in any other way. This is
the only way building 7 was able to collapse.
The US government could not destroy the WTC even in theory. President Bush
acted awkwardly when he was informed about 9/11, which tells me he knew nothing
about it. He would not be able to hide it if he knew. Also, I cannot even
imagine how the government would find one person in the darkest corner of the
CIA willing to kill thousands of fellow citizens. Planting explosives in the
WTC would require the engagement of a large number of people. Also, there is no
guarantee they would all keep silent. That would be entirely an impossible
mission. I've found that all of the accusations against the government are
incredibly shallow nonsenses leading me to conclude that we are witnessing a
conspiracy against the government, innocent of the destruction 9/11.
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
3
1
1
