Immense propaganda has accused the US government of committing 9/11. My investigation has discovered that the US government had no involvement. It exposed to me that some organization must have financed the false accusations of the US government from which it must have profited. This uncovered to me the 9/11 conspiracy did occur but not as presented by the media. The conspirators are masters of deception and this article presents how they fooled people.
Nineteen Islamic extremists hijacked four airplanes and carried out suicide attacks on September 11, 2001 (9/11). Two of the planes were flown into the twin towers of the World Trade Center (WTC) in New York, a third plane hit the Pentagon in Washington, D.C., and the fourth plane crashed into a field in Pennsylvania. Almost 3,000 people were killed during the terrorist attacks.
The US government conducted and
reported on an investigation about the 9/11 terrorist attacks with the help of
The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). The findings are
presented in short here: FAQs - NIST
WTC Towers Investigation. It states that the planes' impact, fire, and the
heavy load of the buildings destroyed the WTC and the Pentagon. The US
government accused the leader of Al-Qaeda, Osama Bin Laden, for 9/11, although
they did not provide confirmatory evidence. They tried to seize Osama Bin Laden
but he was killed in the attempt, which left many important questions
unanswered. The investigation failed to offer a convincing answer to the basic
question: why did these 19 terrorists do it?
Together, the doors opened wide for conspiracy theories. A large number of people disagree with the NIST report. They accuse the US government of destroying the WTC by planting explosive devices in it and crushing the part of the Pentagon with a missile. One of the leading organizations that accuse the government is "Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth." The accusations of these organizations are mainly presented on social networks such as Facebook and YouTube. Their reports dominate the topic with thousands of documentaries trying to prove the government did it. These reports are pseudoscientific so I have to disagree with them.
If we analyze motives for the terrorist attack, the government and mainstream US media have found it in the fact that the suicidal terrorists did not like US values, freedom and democracy. Those are really shallow and miserable statements with which I strongly disagree. If they were even slightly objective, they would find a motive in the aggressive US foreign policy.
The alternative media has found the motive for the alleged government's involvement in the demolition of the WTC in the desire to get the American people to support the conquering of independent countries in the Middle East. The wars in the Middle East were indeed triggered by 9/11. However, I do not see how US government officials would be able to gain personally from the crime of aggression on these independent countries.
While reading discussions related to 9/11 on various forums, I found the most significant divide was between people who think the government did it and those who do not believe it. I would say approximately half accuse the government of 9/11 and a half don't. They fiercely argue about why 9/11 happened, who had an interest in it, and finally who did it. They were not able to find convincing answers and an explanation to which all might agree. It triggered me to see the truth about 9/11. I performed my investigation which gave conclusive answers to all of the questions regarding 9/11. I am presenting my findings here.
The twin towers. We all saw two planes hit the twin towers. The planes' impacts critically damaged them. If the planes were twice as large, they would probably have cut the towers in two. Then the fire weakened the construction of the buildings until the huge loads of the buildings reached critical pressure, causing the crash of the towers. That was the government's explanation, with which I agree. I wrote the article A Clear Explanation Why the Twin Towers Collapsed in which I have scientifically explained how the skyscrapers crushed down. I believe it is a credible explanation.
The alternative media on social networks have accused the US government of planting explosives, which destroyed the twin towers. Thousands of reports and documentaries tried to convince people by using suggestive explanations such as the buildings could never collapse if hit by a plane, or that the explosions that destroyed the buildings were heard by many witnesses. Some of the mainstream media broadcasted or published the accusations of the alternative ones.
I would like to know why not one of these reports asked essential questions like why anybody would try to destroy both twin towers twice at the same time when both of the attempts are extremely difficult to realize? Where exactly would the explosive devices be planted to demolish the buildings the way they went down? Who might plant the explosives? How would planting the explosives possibly go unnoticed by people who work there? Explosive experts would have to plant the explosives exactly at the place where the planes hit the buildings or else the collapse might start elsewhere. That means they would have to know in advance where the jets were going to hit the buildings. This is hard to believe even if the pilots were extremely skilled. But then if the planes hit the building exactly where the explosives were planted, why did they not go off immediately when the planes hit? What exactly might have triggered the presumed explosives and how? What would determine the timing of the explosion? None of that was questioned, analyzed, explained, or discussed, not to mention investigated, which is way too short of a serious accusation against the government.
Here I enclosed one of many very shallow documentaries that try to prove that explosive devices demolished the twin towers: WTC: How The Towers Fell. Instead, it actually proves that the collapse of both buildings was caused by the damage of the planes, fire, and the large weight of the buildings.
The slow-motion video at 38:23 is a well-documented cheat easy to debunk. The narrator states that the top of the building disappears in the explosion. But no explosion is to be seen; there is no high-speed debris flying from the place of the alleged blast. Instead, the documentary presents the implosion of the top of the building and collapsing floors. One can see eruptions of smoke and fire coming out from the building, but not as the result of explosions, but under the pressure of collapsing floors. Some people believed they heard explosions in the buildings. They were mistaken. If we throw a book on a table, it will bang. Imagine how loud the collapse of the whole floor would bang! That was what those people heard.
The upper part of the building started imploding floor by floor at the level where the plane hit the building. The construction below was rigid and resisted the collapse of nearly 10 stories (see the scale in the above-linked video) which piled on before reaching the critical weight and the kinetic energy of the load, which the construction below could not withstand. Then the weight of the building hammered down floor by floor the whole building to the foundations, almost like a free fall. Yes, the construction was sturdy but not enough to resist the power of the falling load above. The columns below bent and collapsed like nails hit by a big hammer to a hard surface. That is all one needs to understand physics.
And finally, the first building to collapse was hit second by the plane. Why? The second building was hit lower than the first one so that the load above the plane's impact of the second building was more significant than the weight above the first. The more massive pressure quickened the collapse of the building hit second. That also indicates that the collapses were not triggered by the explosion.
All talk of explosive use is devised fraud of false conspiracy creators. It proves the documentary was created on purpose to accuse the government and trick people.
The Pentagon. No camera
clearly shows the Pentagon being hit by a plane. The security cameras around
the Pentagon had a speed of one snapshot per second while the plane flew at 200
meters per second so that it escaped the camera. That opened the door to conspiracy
theorists claiming not a plane hit the Pentagon but a missile. Again thousands
of alternative media have created fake pseudoscientific reports claiming a
missile caused the Pentagon destruction. So according to these reports, the
Pentagon hit the Pentagon with a missile.
These reports did not bother to question where the missing plane was if a missile hit the Pentagon? The attack on the Pentagon occurred at 9:45 AM. Hundreds of people saw the plane hitting the Pentagon and not one person saw a missile. That is the reason these reports did not bother to ask the eyewitnesses what they saw. Even the conspiracy theory stood on extremely shaky legs; not a seriously organized effort has been made to debunk these reports.
All these fake reports cannot cheat those who think with their heads and try to discover the truth on their own. Some individuals fought for the fact but got lost in a sea of fake reports. For example, Jeffrey Hill, frustrated by false statements about the destruction of the Pentagon, conducted his own research nine years after the incident. He searched the archive of various newspapers trying to find the eyewitnesses statements. He found many witnesses and interviewed them by unsolicited phone calls in which he asked them to confirm what they saw on 9/11. After that Jeffrey Hill said: "These people did not talk about hypotheticals based on the size of the hole in the Pentagon or the lack of aircraft debris; they related what they saw on 9/11." Jeffrey Hill presented the voice recordings and his analysis here: What really happened."His conclusion was: "The Pentagon was hit by a plane, end of story." He proved it.
The Pentagon actually collapsed the same way as the twin towers even though the load above the impact point was much smaller. The longer time under the fire replaced the lesser destructive power of the Pentagon weight.
The WTC building 7. It is the core of the conspiracy theory because the supporters of conspiracy theories stated such a building never collapsed due to fire. To them, it looked like a controlled demolition, controlled demolition, controlled demolition, repeated thousands of times in thousands of reports. In such a way the collapse of WTC building 7 has become a controlled demolition to a large number of people.
However, everything that these
reports present is wrong. Actual future events proved that high-rise buildings
do collapse in the fire. On May 13, 2008, the 13-story building of the Faculty
of Architecture, at the Delft University of Technology, Netherlands, collapsed
under fire. On 19 January 2017 the 17-story Plasco Building in Tehran, Iran,
collapsed during a skyscraper fire.
Also, one could not possibly secretly plant explosive devices in either WTC building. First, planting explosives that can destroy the building requires a lot of time and it cannot pass undetected by people who work there, and second, such explosives cannot be invisible.
The collapse of WTC building 7 really looked like a controlled demolition as it was presented in media, but that does not mean it was indeed a controlled demolition. All these "deep analytic and scientific" documentaries about the collapse of building 7 have "forgotten" to present that its core collapsed 7 seconds before the rest of the building. They skipped that on purpose because this would prove that no explosive was used in the collapse of the building. Please take a look at the following documentary: 9/11 WTC 7 Demolition - Westside Highway CBS Camera Angle at 7:24.
No controlled demolition of any building ever happened in two parts with a 7-second delay. A camera never detected the explosion in building 7, nor did anybody see it even though the building was under constant supervision before the downfall.
So what happened? Building 7 was damaged by debris flying from the North WTC twin tower. It burned almost all day after being abandoned by firefighters, which was normal after the ruin of the twin towers. When firefighters abandoned the burning building its collapse was just a matter of time. The whole day fire additionally weakened the damaged steel structure of the building. The heavy load of the building destroyed the weakest columns of the core of the building, which led to its collapse.
But why did the whole building collapse? The fire did not affect the entire building. I am an architect and engineer and will try to explain it here in a way everyone can understand. The collapse of the core of the building together with the broken corner disturbed the balance of the building static causing the horizontal pressure. As a result, the whole building twisted one second before the collapse, which is visible in the documentary. The controlled demolition cannot cause this twist because controlled demolitions always collapse buildings straight down. These buildings drop, they do not twist. This twist destroyed the building.
Steel construction is strongly resistant to axial pressures but is very weak to bending moment stresses. Steel columns are too thin to keep resistance to big bending forces, especially if exposed to high temperature. They act like wooden sticks. One can easily break a stick by bending it until it snaps and that is the only way to break it. The same happens to steel columns. When the construction of building 7 twisted, the load of the building created big bending moment stress to the steel columns. They bent practically without resistance and in no time on the floor most damaged by fire. Then the building collapsed almost in free fall as we saw. Building 7 started falling in the core slightly ahead of the perimeters. That delay presents the horizontal speed of the collapsing columns under the load.
So the only convincing claim of conspiracy theorists lied in the fact that the collapse of building 7 did look like a controlled demolition; however, steel construction buildings actually could not collapse in any other way. This is the only way building 7 was able to collapse.
The US government could not destroy the WTC even in theory. President Bush acted awkwardly when he was informed about 9/11, which tells me he knew nothing about it. He would not be able to hide it if he knew. Also, I cannot even imagine how the government would find one person in the darkest corner of the CIA willing to kill thousands of fellow citizens. Planting explosives in the WTC would require the engagement of a large number of people. Also, there is no guarantee they would all keep silent. That would be entirely an impossible mission. I've found that all of the accusations against the government are incredibly shallow nonsenses leading me to conclude that we are witnessing a conspiracy against the government, innocent of the destruction 9/11.
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).