Protests in Paris over Charlie Hebdo massacre last week
Yesterday well over a million people, including many world leaders, marched and protested in Paris over the Charlie Hebdo massacre committed last week by what "officials" say were Muslim terrorists, three of whom were reportedly killed in a separate incident. Another person, allegedly a woman depicted as an organizer remains at large.
The revulsion to this crime against journalists is palpable as many people feel it is against a threat to their freedom.
But what if, and it's a big what if, the "official" version of the events and the perpetrators is not exactly what they say it is; that ISIS, al Qaeda were behind the attack and it was in revenge against the magazine and its cartoonists for making a joke and ridiculing the prophet Muhammad considered blasphemy according to Muslims.
Where is the proof of these allegations? Certainly no thorough investigation has been conducted confirming this "official" version.
As usual in high profile crimes like this, there's a rush to judgment, it had to be what the government says even though the allegations are speculation, not confirmed by an investigation. And because the crime was so horrendous we're expected to accept and believe the "official" version; no need for a thorough investigation uncovering the true connections of the perpetrators and the plotters behind the scenes that gave the go ahead.
All we hear is it is France's 9/11 and people saying, "We are Charlie" including film stars.
There's a bandwagon effect jumping to conclusion before the evidence is gathered.
As with 9/11, it had to be Muslim terrorists because that was what the government said and endlessly repeated by the MSM.
The 19 "terrorist" hijackers were immediately identified as the perpetrators. The "proof"; an airport surveillance camera video of them going through security purportedly at Logan International in Boston when the truth was later discovered the pictures were taken at Portland International earlier on 9/11 making it impossible they were on the planes that took off from Logan. Their names weren't even on the passenger manifests.
Days after the attack, the rubble of the downed World Trade Center buildings was removed BEFORE any investigation of the debris was conducted.
As for the eye witness accounts of firemen in the buildings as they were collapsing but able to escape unharmed these weren't reported in the media, particularly firemen saying they heard distinct, one after another demolition type explosions from above and below as the buildings were collapsing.
A passport allegedly from one of the 19 attackers was found "miraculously" on the ground in the vicinity of the downed buildings yet no MSM even questioned how such a document could have managed to be found in pristine condition without being vaporized in the fireball. Was it just tossed out of the plane just before it hit one of the towers? It's beyond ridiculous.
These are some of the many absurd anomalies plaguing the "official" version of 9/11 making it far fetched unbelievable, not to mention the video of World Trade Center Building # 7 collapsing as it appears to be a controlled demotion- a scene familiar when a Las Vegas casino is demolished.
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).