By Cyril Mychalejko and Ramor RyanZapotec communities demand geographers leave Oaxaca; U.S. geographers call for investigation
A University of Kansas professor is under fire for a mapping project in Mexico partially funded by the U.S. Defense Department as colleagues in the field of geography are calling for an investigation, while growing local opposition to the project leaves it in peril.
Professor Peter Herlihy, lead geographer for México Indígena, a participatory mapping project allegedly intended to empower the largely indigenous populations of Oaxaca, Mexico in light of land reforms enacted in the 1990s to promote privatization, has been accused of violating ethical norms of the field and using scholarship as a tool for intelligence gathering for the U.S. government.
Wainwright and colleague Professor Joe Bryan from the University of Colorado-Boulder, both geographers, co-wrote a letter on March 15 to the president and vice president of the Association of American Geographers (AAG) requesting "an inquiry into a potential violation of the ethical norms of our profession."
The two geography professors were compelled to write the letter after reading a communiqué sent out in January by the Union of Organizations of the Sierra Juárez of Oaxaca (UNOSJO) claiming that Prof. Herlihy did not disclose the funding and relationship provided by the Foreign Military Studies Office, a research center focusing on counterinsurgency that also runs the controversial Human Terrain System in Iraq and Afghanistan where anthropologists were embedded with military units to conduct research to advance U.S. military objectives-a program the American Anthropological Association denounced.
"When you don't tell people who belong to a racially or economic marginalized group that you are doing research funded by the military and that has direct bearing on potential military activities, that is exploitative. Not only does it treat marginalized populations as objects of research rather than as political subjects, it also places them at considerable risk of political reprisals and even bodily harm," said University of Colorado's Bryan.
Bryan and Wainwright wrote a follow-up letter on April 14 regarding the AAG's decision to form a task force. In it they petition the AAG to investigate:
"(1) the evidence that [Professor] Herlihy revealed his funding source at the time of obtaining consent; (2) the extent that the FMSO shaped the design of the research itself; and (3) the extent to which [Professor] Herlihy has made the results from the research available to FMSO personnel."
The AAG's Indigenous Peoples Specialty Group sent a letter to the organization's Executive Board endorsing Bryan and Wainwright's letter. The IPSG's letter states: "We took this action after receiving the March 17 statement by the municipal authority for the Oaxaca community of San Miguel Tiltepec [something Bryan and Wainwright cite], which asserted it had not been fully informed of FMSO involvement, and called on the research team to 'cease and desist' and return the project data." The IPSG co-chairs who wrote the letter also requested that the AAG "pass a resolution strongly recommending that the University of Kansas conduct an inquiry into the Bowman Expeditions / México Indígena project, as part of its Institutional Review process...[because] Setting the record straight should be welcomed by all sides in the debate."
Let the Communities Speak for Themselves
But when the community in question did speak for themselves, it was to repudiate México Indígena.
"We, the citizens of the community of San Miguel Tiltepec, through our Municipal Authority and Commissioner of Communal Goods, would like to let you know our position regarding an investigative project called México Indígena, begun in 2006 and finished in July of 2008, which produced a map containing information regarding place names as well as other cultural and geographical information furnished by people in our community...Information has been circulated in different news media and on the internet, alleging that our community agrees with the results of the investigation, when we were not even aware of what was going on. These statements were made by researchers from the México Indígena project (Peter Herlihy) and the president of the American Geographic Society, Jerome Dobson. For the reasons stated above, we want to made our disagreement perfectly clear with regards to the investigation carried on in our community since we were never duly informed of the true aims of the project, the uses of the information furnished, or the sources of financing."