Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 1 Share on Facebook 2 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 8 (11 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   No comments
OpEdNews Op Eds

Mighty administrators at the University of Colorado-Boulder are bullying the philosophy department

By       Message Thomas Farrell     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 3 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H4 2/27/14

Author 38575
Become a Fan
  (20 fans)
- Advertisement -

Duluth, Minnesota (OpEdNews) February 26, 2014: Are the faculty in a university department somehow collectively responsible for monitoring other faculty in the department regarding possible sexual harassment? If so, how are they supposed to proceed to do this monitoring? How often is the possible sexual harassment public enough that other faculty can observe it when it is occurring?

After a certain faculty member has been found guilty of a sexual harassment charge, should his identity as a harasser be made public? If his identity as a harasser were made public, what exactly should the other faculty members in the philosophy department do as a result of knowing this? But if his identity as a harasser isn't made public, what, if anything, is supposed to deter him from further sexual harassment?

- Advertisement -


These intriguing questions are raised by Sarah Kuta's news story "Philosophy profs.: CU-Boulder shouldn't have shared private info" in the Daily Camera, the newspaper in Boulder, Colorado, dated February 24, 2014.

I know, I know, Colorado is flyover country. Why should Americans be concerned about what the administration of the University of Colorado-Boulder is doing to the philosophy department there?

Unfortunately, many university administrators think they are mighty administrators. But I think the administration there is abusing its power against the philosophy department. Let me explain my concern.

- Advertisement -

The administration shared confidential information with the three-member visitation team from the American Philosophical Association in connection with their invited assessment of the climate of the philosophy department. The three signed confidentiality agreements regarding the confidential information they reviewed in the files of the Office of Discrimination and Harassment (ODH).

Nevertheless, the three stated in their report that "at least 15 complaints" against faculty in the philosophy department had been filed with the ODH -- evidently, since 2007. Those complaints formed part of the background that got the philosophy department into hot water with the administration, leading eventually to the invitation for the site visit.

But isn't it a violation of their confidentiality agreement for them to reveal the minimum number of complaints filed against the faculty in the philosophy department? Or was this already common knowledge in the philosophy department? If it was, was it also already common knowledge in the news media in Colorado?

On January 31, 2014, the administration made the report public by posting it online for any interested persons to view, thereby making the factoid about the 15 complaints public.

As a result of the administration's unexpected action in making the report public, the number of cases filed against the faculty in the philosophy department has been widely reported in news stories and in op-ed commentaries since then.

In the above-mentioned news story, Sarah Kuta makes the following statement:

"Under the Colorado Open Records Act, public institutions are required to deny the inspection of sexual harassment files to the general public. However, CU officials said that because the site visit team investigators were performing an administrative function for the university, they were not acting as members of the public."

- Advertisement -

Got that? Three faculty members from three other universities were not acting a members of the public, in which case the names of the parties involved in each complaint would have been redacted from their view.

At first blush, the administration's line of thought here may sound reasonable enough.

But the administration's line of thought here does not explicitly address the specific factoid in the report about "at least 15 complaints" having been filed against faculty members in the philosophy department.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3


- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It
Thomas James Farrell is professor emeritus of writing studies at the University of Minnesota Duluth (UMD). He started teaching at UMD in Fall 1987, and he retired from UMD at the end of May 2009. He was born in 1944. He holds three degrees from Saint Louis University (SLU): B.A. in English, 1966; M.A.(T) in English 1968; higher education, 1974. On May 16, 1969, the editors of the SLU student newspaper named him Man of the Year, an honor customarily conferred on an administrator or a faculty member, not on a graduate student -- nor on a woman up to that time. He is the proud author of the book (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
/* The Petition Site */
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Was the Indian Jesuit Anthony de Mello Murdered in the U.S. 25 Years Ago? (BOOK REVIEW)

Who Was Walter Ong, and Why Is His Thought Important Today?

More Americans Should Live Heroic Lives of Virtue (Review Essay)

Martha Nussbaum on Why Democracy Needs the Humanities (Book Review)

Hillary Clinton Urges Us to Stand Up to Extremists in the U.S.

Matthew Fox's Critique of the Roman Catholic Church