Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 10 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 3/17/16

Merrick Garland, What's the Point?

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages) (View How Many People Read This)   2 comments
Author 42414
Message Marc Ash
Become a Fan
  (5 fans)

Reprinted from Reader Supported News

Sen. Orrin Hatch
Sen. Orrin Hatch
(Image by The Arc of the United States, Channel: thearcoftheus)
  Details   DMCA
>

The mantra from the DNC for weeks, since Antonin Scalia died, has been "Fight for President Obama's Supreme Court pick!" What they should have said is "Ratify Orin Hatch's Supreme Court pick that Obama will announce."

Who cares about Barack Obama or his right, duty, to choose a Supreme Court nominee? Longtime conservative power-broker Senator Orin Hatch of Utah picked Merrick Garland and Obama obeyed. End of story.

Hatch said:

"[Obama] could easily name Merrick Garland, who is a fine man ... he probably won't do that because this appointment is about the election. So I'm pretty sure he'll name someone the [liberal Democratic base] wants."

Obama apparently took Hatch's cue and complied.

Battle? Ideological confrontation? Reshaping of the Court? Forget it -- Garland is a safe pick for America's ruling class. Obama punted. Hatch defeated him without a fight.

Better than Scalia. Sure, but that really doesn't say much. Scalia was arguably the most purely politically-motivated Supreme Court justice in American history. A ham-fisted, ideologically driven, right-wing operative who came to the court every day with a clearly defined agenda. Will Garland be better? Yes. Will Garland show any courage in moving the country forward? Not likely.

Why would anyone who understands the scope of the problems facing the country today fight for this Hatch-Obama offering? They should not. To those who would argue that Obama had to do this to get a nominee, any nominee, approved: That's absurd. It's not about getting "any nominee" approved. We don't "fight" for approval. We fight for a better, more just nation. Something no one in the nation's capitol has any apparent concern for.

Obama will leave the Presidency as he began it, wrapping his policy and legacy around not offending white Republicans.

It's a travesty and an abdication.

Would a President Hillary Clinton show more courage? She couldn't show less.

 

Rate It | View Ratings

Marc Ash Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Marc Ash is the founder and former Executive Director of Truthout, now the founder, editor and publisher of Reader Supported News: http://www.readersupportednews.org

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Betrayal of Cecily McMillan

Are the Oak Ridge Defendants Obama's p*ssy Riot?

What Leeann Tweeden Did Not Say

Tortured Folks

Plutocrats Win Control of Congress

TPP: The Case for Treason

To View Comments or Join the Conversation: