Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 10 Share on Twitter 1 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
Life Arts    H2'ed 9/9/21

Meet J. "Black" Leroy Hulsey: He's Got Some Bad News About WTC7

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)   17 comments, In Series: Film Review
Become a Premium Member Would you like to know how many people have read this article? Or how reputable the author is? Simply sign up for a Advocate premium membership and you'll automatically see this data on every article. Plus a lot more, too.
Author 517692
Follow Me on Twitter     Message John Hawkins
Become a Fan
  (4 fans)

NIST and UAF models of destruction WTC7
NIST and UAF models of destruction WTC7
(Image by UAF)
  Details   DMCA

Meet J. "Black" Leroy Hulsey: He's Got Some Bad News About WTC7

by John Kendall Hawkins

J. Leroy Hulsey, Ph.D., P.E., S.E., University of Alaska Fairbanks. Professor Emeritus in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. He received his scientific training at the University of Illinois-Urbana-Champaign. "The reason I went there is: That was probably the number one school in the nation in structural engineering, and I wanted to study under the best." he tells us in the new 9/11 What Happened film, Seven. It's almost like he feels compelled to dangle his creds.

His story checks out: Hulsey went there, as he claims, and the structural engineering program at UIUC is regarded as one of America's best, just behind MIT and Berkeley in some surveys. That's what he has to tell you, up front. He's legit. And he would tell you to your face: World Trade Center 7 did not come down by fire on September 11, 2001. He can't tell everyone to their face -- literally -- so this film telling will have to do. The second thing he'll tell you to your probably mawkish face is that "the collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building."

Oh, no. Here we go again. I can't read your mind, but I'd wager all my worldly sins, that that's what you're going with as you read Dr. Hulsey's conclusions about WTC7. He's a well-known, well-liked instructor at UAF who, whether you like it or not, is a force to be reckoned with. His conclusions are the result of four years of rigorous scientific investigation, and we're told, in Seven, that Hulsey went out of his way to keep politics out of it. He was all, Just the Facts, Ma'am, as Joe Friday used to tell us on TV's Dragnet, back in the black-and-white days before the Turd Blossoms turned us against reality-based thinking.

Dr. Hulsey spent four years, from 2016-2020, putting his report and its conclusions together. Checking and rechecking his data until he was sure it was time to present to the public and his peers. You can find the Abstract and Full Report of his A Structural Reevaluation of the Collapse of World Trade Center 7 here. In addition, Hulsey even provides a link to the simulation materials he used to come to his conclusions, so that "any person with the requisite software tools to examine and replicate all of the computer analyses performed during this study" can do so. Also, if you go to the AE911Truth site you can view a public presentation of his findings making the rounds of conspiracy aficionados and academics alike. As far as Hulsey is concerned, as well as his Truth movement followers, his science-based modeling and results should be enough for the government to open another investigation.

A few years back Noam Chomsky, during a Q/A session following a speech he delivered to a University of Florida crowd, an activist confronted him with a question about WTC7,

You've mentioned quite a few contradictions from the media and their presentation on things, and I think the most notorious case of this is with September 11, 2001...There is a consensus [among scientists signed on to Architects and Engineers 911 Truth] that the third building that fell on 911 fell in free fall speed, as the NIST Report acknowledges. Are you ready to come forward and jump on board with 911. I know you mentioned that it's a distraction, but there's no better case of the media covering up things than not presenting that third building...What about Building 7, Noam?

Well, it seemed like a good question at the time.

But, we can see from his reaction that our oracle, our public intellectual, has heard this question before, and almost like Dylan going electric after being harangued by the folkies to lead them, Noam puts the whippersnapper down with some choice disdain:

Well, you're right. There's a consensus around a minuscule number of architects and engineers -- tiny number. A couple of them are perfectly serious. They're not doing what scientists and engineers do when they think they've discovered something... What you do is write articles in scientific journals and give talks at the professional societies that go to the civil engineering department at MIT [or wherever] and then present your results and proceed to try to convince the national academies, the professional, physicists and civil engineers...at the major universities. Now there happen to be a lot of people around who spent an hour on the internet and think they know a lot of physics, but it doesn't work like that...

So true.

The Deus ex MIT Machina goes on to add that he has no real opinion on the doings at WTC7 on 9/11, including claims that nanothermite was used. Though he is still, arguably, the world's leading linguist, he owns that that does not make him an expert in architecture or engineering, and that, far from being cowed, scientists are far more likely to call for an investigation if science-backed research called for it. Instead, as he has maintained for years, we should be looking at the larger picture: American hegemony. The events of 9/11 gave cover for what the US long lusted to do in Iraq, where the world's second largest oil reserves are located. Do "we" think that ignoring information of an impending attack was "worth it"? Oh, yeah.

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

 

Must Read 2   Valuable 2   Well Said 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

John Hawkins Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter Page       Linked In Page       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

John Kendall Hawkins is an American ex-pat freelance journalist and poet currently residing in Australia. His poetry, commentary, and reviews have appeared in publications in Oceania, Europe and the USA, such as Cordite, Morning Star, Hanging (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Chicago 7: Counter Cultural Learnings of America for Make Money Glorious Nation of Post-Truthvaluestan

Finding the Mother Tree: An Interview with Suzanne Simard

Book Review: 2034:A Novel of the Next World War

Sonnet: Mother's Day Poem

Dylan at 80: A Sonnet of Appreciation

Assange: "Send Him Back" to Australia

Comments Image Post Article Comment and Rate This Article

These discussions are not moderated. We rely on users to police themselves, and flag inappropriate comments and behavior. In accordance with our Guidelines and Policies, we reserve the right to remove any post at any time for any reason, and will restrict access of registered users who repeatedly violate our terms.

  • OpEdNews welcomes lively, CIVIL discourse. Personal attacks and/or hate speech are not tolerated and may result in banning.
  • Comments should relate to the content above. Irrelevant, off-topic comments are a distraction, and will be removed.
  • By submitting this comment, you agree to all OpEdNews rules, guidelines and policies.
          

Comment Here:   


You can enter 2000 characters.
Become a Premium Member Would you like to be able to enter longer comments? You can enter 10,000 characters with Leader Membership. Simply sign up for your Premium Membership and you can say much more. Plus you'll be able to do a lot more, too.

Please login or register. Afterwards, your comment will be published.
 

Username
Password
Show Password

Forgot your password? Click here and we will send an email to the address you used when you registered.
First Name
Last Name

I am at least 16 years of age
(make sure username & password are filled in. Note that username must be an email address.)

8 people are discussing this page, with 17 comments  Post Comment


Lance Ciepiela

Become a Fan
Author 14196
Follow Me on Twitter (Member since Apr 4, 2008), 53 fans, 58 articles, 216 quicklinks, 5708 comments, 216 diaries (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content

For the first time ever, an elected body in the United States is stating that it is "beyond any doubt" that explosives - not plane impacts and fires alone - destroyed the three World Trade Center towers on Sept. 11, 2001. #FederalCrimes.

"Well placed dynamite" - CBS Evening News with Dan Rather. #WTC7. 9/11 Families - sue #NIST.

Among individuals who witnessed the event firsthand, the more prevalent hypothesis was that the Twin Towers had been brought down by #MassiveExplosions. 9/11 Treason - MEMO - to Congress .

Submitted on Thursday, Sep 9, 2021 at 1:13:17 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (3+)
Flag This
Share Comment More Sharing          
Commenter Blocking?
Indent

Robert Gormley

Become a Fan
Author 42289
(Member since Dec 12, 2009), 1331 comments (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Reply to Lance Ciepiela:   New Content

What took them so long?

Submitted on Friday, Sep 10, 2021 at 6:19:00 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (2+)
Flag This
Share Comment More Sharing          
Commenter Blocking?
IndentIndent

Lance Ciepiela

Become a Fan
Author 14196
Follow Me on Twitter (Member since Apr 4, 2008), 53 fans, 58 articles, 216 quicklinks, 5708 comments, 216 diaries (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Reply to Robert Gormley:   New Content

Yes, the 'official 9/11 story' - the 'terrorists' attacked America - had shocked the nation so severely, killing 'almost' 3,000 persons, and that's most likely 'what took so long'.

Every since then 'the truth' keeps on 'bubbling to the surface', and usually 'right on cue', ignored - World Trade Center 7 'explodes' at 5:20 PM - by the MSM and our elected and appointed leaders and officials, even after 20 years - "Every" - #911Anniversary. #GrandJuryPetition.

Submitted on Friday, Sep 10, 2021 at 11:58:29 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (2+)
Flag This
Share Comment More Sharing          
Commenter Blocking?

Fred W

Become a Fan
Author 8452
(Member since Oct 30, 2007), 5 fans, 1 quicklinks, 826 comments (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content

Pretty good summing up, imho, John. It's worth noting, I think, that Chomsky took a similar line regarding the JFK assassination, but with a bit of a twist: he said that JFK was such a tool of imperialism that he thought it unlikely that anyone on the side of imperialism would have wanted to do Kennedy in, and that, really, whether it was Oswald alone or not didn't make much difference to him, given the "big picture" of the fight between good and evil that he sees.

It does seem that sometimes the "details" get in the way of the main issues, e.g., whether one should spend much time on whether Biden made a mess of the Afghan withdrawal when the more important issue is that we did withdraw. But with 9/11 (and the JFK and other assassinations of the time), it seems rather important to know if and when government is duping us. After all, the government interpretation of 9/11 caused so much damage, which is still going on.

Submitted on Thursday, Sep 9, 2021 at 2:16:41 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (2+)
Flag This
Share Comment More Sharing          
Commenter Blocking?
Indent

John Hawkins

Become a Fan
Author 517692
Follow Me on Twitter (Member since Aug 11, 2020), 4 fans, 388 articles, 5 quicklinks, 455 comments, 2 diaries (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)

"All, all except Phineas, constructed at infinite cost to themselves this Maginot Line against this enemy they thought they saw across the frontier, this enemy that never attacked that way--if he ever attacked at all. If indeed he was the enemy."
       -- John Knowles

Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter Page Linked In Page Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Reply to Fred W:   New Content

Well, I agree that it's important to find out if the government is duping us. Let's always assume that they are. Why would we ever think otherwise? It's the job -- the mission -- of the MSM to keep us informed of the doings of the Bastards. We should always avoid patriotic rhetoric and flowers for algernon and who cut the cheese -- it get right to it. Term limits are in order. Rules changes so that senators and reps can't claim no inside knowledge "because their spouses handled the transaction or account." We need to rebuild America, alright, by a new constitutional convention that starts out by guaranteeing the Bill of Rights as a starting poing, and then everything else is an amendment.

Submitted on Thursday, Sep 9, 2021 at 8:24:38 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (2+)
Flag This
Share Comment More Sharing          
Commenter Blocking?
Indent

John Hawkins

Become a Fan
Author 517692
Follow Me on Twitter (Member since Aug 11, 2020), 4 fans, 388 articles, 5 quicklinks, 455 comments, 2 diaries (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)

"All, all except Phineas, constructed at infinite cost to themselves this Maginot Line against this enemy they thought they saw across the frontier, this enemy that never attacked that way--if he ever attacked at all. If indeed he was the enemy."
       -- John Knowles

Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter Page Linked In Page Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Reply to Fred W:   New Content

Well, that's true, that's what Chomsky says. It's the big picture historical process that keeps track of, and if we get too caught up in the exploding brain matter, we can lose track of the cold calculations of these monsters who set these events up. Chomsky says that instead of stewing in our paranoia over events that we can't "prove" in a courtroom, we should go after do-able changes. Foreign policy, money grubbers on Wall Street, military budgets that go unaccounted for (How is possible to lose 2.3 Trillion dollars, roughly what it cost to run the 20 year Afghan war, without any accountability?). We'll never know if Oswald was alone for sure. We'll never know if elements of the US government colluded with the Saudis to let 9/11 happen. But we can, if we try hard enough, change policies and people who make them. Term limits. Nationalize the banks. Have the C-o-C commit to no more wars, to close the 700 bases overseas, to downside the D.

Submitted on Sunday, Sep 12, 2021 at 7:30:23 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (0+)
Flag This
Share Comment More Sharing          
Commenter Blocking?

David Watts

Become a Fan
Author 10429
(Member since Jan 31, 2008), 17 fans, 44 articles, 29 quicklinks, 3005 comments, 28 diaries (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content

I have been saying this since January 2009 when I posted a diary here at OEN that this short simple proof is all that is needed to prove 9/11 was an inside job/false flag attack. This proof cannot be disproved, disproven, or proved not to be true. Therefore, to prove 9/11 was an inside job needs nothing more than this very short, very simple proof:

I. Given that a crumpling or naturally collapsing building absorbs energy making free fall impossible (David Chandler, Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth);

II. And Given that NIST agrees: Free fall is impossible in a building crumpling or collapsing naturally due to structural resistance (Shyam Sunder, NIST);

III. Therefore, NIST understands that it requires no structural resistance for a building to free fall.

IV. Given that NIST showed WTC7 was in free fall;

V. And Given that the only way free fall can occur is to remove all structural resistance at once and that can only be done with a controlled demolition;

VI. Therefore, the free falling WTC7 was a controlled demolition.

(The following follows logically from the above):

Given that it takes at least weeks to plan and prepare a building like WTC7 for a controlled demolition; and given that there is no reason to believe anyone other than "insiders" could have carried out the advanced preparation and actual execution of the controlled demolition of the secure WTC7 ("CIA Building"); therefore the controlled demolition of WTC7 was carried out by "insiders."

Given that WTC7 was brought down on 9/11; and given that there could be no reason to demolish WTC7 other than to be included with the other events on 9/11; therefore, "insiders" also planned and executed the other events on 9/11, i.e., 9/11 was an inside job/false flag event.

Q.E.D.

Note: I came up with nothing new. David Chandler and Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth have been saying the same thing for years. I simply reduced it all to the shortest and simplest form to be given to anyone.

Submitted on Friday, Sep 10, 2021 at 2:35:10 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (3+)
Flag This
Share Comment More Sharing          
Commenter Blocking?
Indent

John Hawkins

Become a Fan
Author 517692
Follow Me on Twitter (Member since Aug 11, 2020), 4 fans, 388 articles, 5 quicklinks, 455 comments, 2 diaries (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)

"All, all except Phineas, constructed at infinite cost to themselves this Maginot Line against this enemy they thought they saw across the frontier, this enemy that never attacked that way--if he ever attacked at all. If indeed he was the enemy."
       -- John Knowles

Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter Page Linked In Page Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Reply to David Watts:   New Content

Sure is a sweet syllogism. You and AE911 are probably right. I donate to AE911.

Submitted on Friday, Sep 10, 2021 at 8:30:15 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (3+)
Flag This
Share Comment More Sharing          
Commenter Blocking?
Indent

Nels Wight

Become a Fan
Author 2581
(Member since Sep 3, 2006), 7 fans, 1925 comments (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Reply to David Watts:   New Content

can't see any way at all that a person could form disagreement with this straightforward

explanation of 9/11. qfuc-ged. thanks again. i've accepted it well before 2009.

Submitted on Friday, Sep 10, 2021 at 1:29:43 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (2+)
Flag This
Share Comment More Sharing          
Commenter Blocking?
IndentIndent

David Watts

Become a Fan
Author 10429
(Member since Jan 31, 2008), 17 fans, 44 articles, 29 quicklinks, 3005 comments, 28 diaries (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Reply to Nels Wight:   New Content

Nels, you recognized the truth before I did. The day I came to understand the truth about 9/11 was May 17th, 2007. That was the day I came across a video of the collapse of WTC7. I distinctly remember watching the 10-second video showing wtc7 coming straight down symmetrically in seven seconds. I remember thinking, I need to watch that again. After watching it a second time, I remember very clearly saying out loud to myself, "There better be a damn good explanation for that, or things are really fucked up!" I like to say that watching the collapse of WTC7, it is intuitively obvious to the most casual observer that it was a controlled demolition. I have never forgotten the date, May 17th 2007, when I watched the video and it felt like I got punched in the gut

Submitted on Friday, Sep 10, 2021 at 11:59:47 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (2+)
Flag This
Share Comment More Sharing          
Commenter Blocking?
IndentIndentIndent

Blair Gelbond

Become a Fan
Author 71296
(Member since Sep 8, 2011), 7 fans, 61 articles, 1 quicklinks, 2341 comments (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Reply to David Watts:   New Content

David,

If you think 9/11 was a colossal sh*t-show, see "Cosmic Hoax" by Steven Greer on Youtube.

Submitted on Saturday, Sep 11, 2021 at 1:27:15 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (2+)
Flag This
Share Comment More Sharing          
Commenter Blocking?
IndentIndentIndentIndent

David Watts

Become a Fan
Author 10429
(Member since Jan 31, 2008), 17 fans, 44 articles, 29 quicklinks, 3005 comments, 28 diaries (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Reply to Blair Gelbond:   New Content

Blair, I have been watching it but I have not finished it yet. It is really good. Steven Greer is excellent. Thank you.

Very recently, on an article I think by Rob Kall about the release of information about aliens and UFOs, I had a number of things to say in comments. I will see if I can find what I said. But even with the probable upcoming cosmic hoax/ false flag, understanding the truth about 9/11 is still critical in understanding the way the world really works.

Submitted on Saturday, Sep 11, 2021 at 1:57:15 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (1+)
Flag This
Share Comment More Sharing          
Commenter Blocking?
IndentIndentIndentIndentIndent

Blair Gelbond

Become a Fan
Author 71296
(Member since Sep 8, 2011), 7 fans, 61 articles, 1 quicklinks, 2341 comments (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Reply to David Watts:   New Content

I agree and your welcome.

In theory, if this knowledge can become widespread, it could put a huge dent in the MIC and the world domination project. It's up to people like you and me to spread the word.

Submitted on Saturday, Sep 11, 2021 at 4:25:28 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (1+)
Flag This
Share Comment More Sharing          
Commenter Blocking?
IndentIndentIndent

Blair Gelbond

Become a Fan
Author 71296
(Member since Sep 8, 2011), 7 fans, 61 articles, 1 quicklinks, 2341 comments (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Reply to David Watts:   New Content

David,

If you think 9/11 was a colossal sh*t-show, see "Cosmic Hoax" by Steven Greer on Youtube.

Submitted on Saturday, Sep 11, 2021 at 1:28:59 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (0+)
Flag This
Share Comment More Sharing          
Commenter Blocking?
IndentIndentIndent

Nels Wight

Become a Fan
Author 2581
(Member since Sep 3, 2006), 7 fans, 1925 comments (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Reply to David Watts:   New Content

yuh, scotto, in 2006 dick gage came here to belfast and ola & I quickly signed up with

architects and engineers. there just was no other way.

Submitted on Saturday, Sep 11, 2021 at 10:03:24 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (2+)
Flag This
Share Comment More Sharing          
Commenter Blocking?
IndentIndentIndentIndent

David Watts

Become a Fan
Author 10429
(Member since Jan 31, 2008), 17 fans, 44 articles, 29 quicklinks, 3005 comments, 28 diaries (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Reply to Nels Wight:   New Content

Good for you, Nels. You want to know what the truth is. There are so damn many people that don't want to know. And I am not just talking about 9/11.

Submitted on Saturday, Sep 11, 2021 at 12:53:37 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (1+)
Flag This
Share Comment More Sharing          
Commenter Blocking?

b. sadie bailey

Become a Fan
Author 56818
(Member since Dec 5, 2010), 15 fans, 5 articles, 25 quicklinks, 1371 comments, 5 diaries (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content

funny. i never trusted our government or the "owners." and i'm 68 and that has pretty much been lifelong. If one studies US history, even skimming the cliff notes... there is no doubt that we can't trust or believe them or their plutocrat/oligarch/globalist handlers and dupes.

I appreciate this article and all the referenced links provided, as well as those in the comments. It's why i stay reading Op-Ed News; it still has some of the best writers, researchers, and thinkers I've encountered anywhere.

Whoever did that wonderful photoshop job on turd blossom... oh how i wish! we need more guerilla art - modern technology's version of the court jester or sacred fool.

Submitted on Sunday, Sep 12, 2021 at 2:56:10 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (0+)
Flag This
Share Comment More Sharing          
Commenter Blocking?

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment