Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 9 Share on Twitter 2 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
General News    H3'ed 11/19/19

Medicare-for-All vs Health Profiteering

Follow Me on Twitter     Message Meryl Ann Butler
Become a Fan
  (84 fans)

Medicare for All Rally
Medicare for All Rally
(Image by mollyktadams)
  Details   DMCA

The RootsAction.org Team has created an excellent flyer headlined "We want Medicare for All. Not healthcare profiteering for the few."

They were at the California Democratic Party convention a few days ago, making sure most of the delegates got the flier, noting, "By far, it was the most widely read and discussed handout of the entire historic convention, which featured presentations by many of the presidential contenders."

When you bump into someone who thinks Medicare-for-All is going to take something away from them instead of give them valuable benefits, this is the info to offer. The content and links are below. Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren are currently the only two presidential contenders with Medicare for All in their platforms.

We want Medicare for All.
Not healthcare profiteering for the few.

Two prominent candidates for the Democratic presidential nomination are not just opposing Medicare for All, they keep denouncing and distorting it.

Joe Biden recently called Medicare for All "ridiculous." And when Pete Buttigieg launched an advertising campaign against Medicare for All this fall, he declared that unlike the proposals from Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren his healthcare policy prescription "doesn't dictate it to the American people and risk further polarizing them."

But we aren't aiming to "dictate" to the American people. The California Democratic Party has long supported single-payer Medicare for All because "healthcare is a human right not a privilege."

We are deeply dismayed that Buttigieg and Biden have opened up a double-barreled assault on Medicare for All. Their inaccuracies have forced us to respond by laying out the facts. The "public option" plans they're touting would not fulfill the human right of healthcare for huge numbers of Americans. Millions would remain uninsured, millions more underinsured. And those plans don't make economic sense.

Mayor Buttigieg is using the slogan "Medicare for all who want it." But Congressman Ro Khanna has pointed out that such a setup "won't bring the administrative costs down of private insurers or maximize negotiation with Big Pharma and hospitals." And: "This means higher premiums, higher drug costs, higher deductibles, and more denied claims for the middle class." This also means less healthcare for lower-income people.

Major sources of Buttigieg's and Biden's funding are in harmony with their current hostility toward Medicare for All. "Pharmaceutical, health insurance, and hospital industry donors have flocked to Mayor Pete all year," investigative journalist Alex Kotch reported. "As of mid-2019, he was second only to Donald Trump in overall campaign cash from donors in the health sector. Among Democratic candidates, he was second to former Vice President Joe Biden in terms of pharmaceutical and health insurance donations."

Sadly, Buttigieg is claiming that Medicare for All would precipitously dump people off of health coverage and deprive them of "choice." Those are insurance-industry talking points. He is deliberately confusing the current "choice" of predatory for-profit insurance plans with the genuine full choice of healthcare providers that enhanced Medicare for everyone would offer.

Meanwhile, Biden has been using scare tactics and sending out absurd messages like this recent tweet: "Let's put this in perspective: if you eliminate every single solitary soldier, tank, satellite, nuclear weapon, eliminate the Pentagon and it would only pay for 4 months of Medicare for All. 4 months. Where do the other 8 months come from? Your paycheck."

That's not the kind of leadership we need for healthcare in our country.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Must Read 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Meryl Ann Butler Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Meryl Ann Butler is an artist, author, educator and OpedNews Managing Editor who has been actively engaged in utilizing the arts as stepping-stones toward joy-filled wellbeing since she was a hippie. She began writing for OpEdNews in Feb, 2004. She became a Senior Editor in August 2012 and Managing Editor in January, (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Bizarre Theft of Dr. Stanislaw Burzynski's Miracle Cancer Cure

Mysterious Bayou Sinkhole Continues to Cave In: Radiation, Hydrocarbons Detected

Relentless Bayou Corne Sinkhole Nearly 30 Times Original Size (UPDATED with Cave-In Video)

Sex, Love, and Jesus: A Few Surprises in the Easter Basket

2012: Armageddon or Quantum Leap? Gregg Braden's Answer-Fractal Time

California Fire Update: Station Fire 1:30 pm, Pacific Time 8-28-09

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

3 people are discussing this page, with 3 comments


911TRUTH

Become a Fan
Author 15356
(Member since Apr 29, 2008), 26 fans, 2859 comments (View Extended Stats)
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content

I heard Buttigieg touting his Medicare for those who want it stupidity at the same time he's saying how we can't afford a true Medicare for All system.

Of course the reporter didn't push back on anything he was saying.

My first question would have been, "OK, how will you pay for your plan if most or everyone opts in your Medicare for those who want it plan"? I'm sure he has no plan for that.

Submitted on Tuesday, Nov 19, 2019 at 4:59:51 PM

  Recommend  (0+)
Help
Indent

Alexander Kershaw

Become a Fan
Author 500827
(Member since Nov 25, 2014), 3 fans, 405 comments (View Extended Stats)
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Reply to 911TRUTH:   New Content

Every time the Medicare for all debate is switched to: "How are we going to pay for it?" the imperative for it is defused. The fact that we are paying at least twice as much per capita as any other country with at least 15% not covered, tells us that the money is there and then some. It just needs to be directed to actual health care instead of insurance company CEO pay and overhead.

Did you know that at least 20% of car insurance goes to medical? That could be redirected. Did you know that 50% of Workers' Comp insurance paid by employers is for medical? That could be redirected to health care and maybe some to wages. Did you know that every home insurance policy has medical coverage? That could be redirected. Did you know that Doctors and hospitals could reduce their fees and still make the same amount of money because their liability insurance would be lower? When there is medicare for all malpractice penalties would not have to cover the on going medical costs of victims only direct dmages?

The list is almost endless but includes the reduction in the cost of products like cars whose companies no longer have to pay health insurance for workers.

Submitted on Wednesday, Nov 20, 2019 at 3:29:00 PM

  Recommend  (0+)
Help

Bear Kosik

Become a Fan
Author 74513
Follow Me on Twitter
(Member since Dec 9, 2011), 6 fans, 28 articles, 112 comments, 5 diaries (View Extended Stats)
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content

Sanders and Warren are NOT the only contenders with Medicare for All in their platforms. Andrew Yang also supports M4A. Why are you ignoring Yang? Your statement is a bald-faced lie. Check your facts before making statements that are inaccurate and ignore other candidates that you just don't want to support.

Submitted on Wednesday, Nov 20, 2019 at 3:39:45 PM

  Recommend  (0+)
Help