Power of Story
Send a Tweet        
- Advertisement -

Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 38 (38 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   3 comments
General News

Major Legal UK Victory Against Aspartame Maker, Ajinomoto

By       Message Stephen Fox     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   Supported 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 7/16/09

Author 4578
Become a Fan
  (24 fans)
- Advertisement -

Asda wins court fight over sweetener claim

[This is a serious and superb legal milestone affirming that a supermarket chain can describe artificial sweetener aspartame as "nasty," if it wants to do so, based on customer responses, whether the corporate miscreant behind the manufacturing of this deadly poison wants to bludgeon critics into silence or not!]
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Leeds-based supermarket chain Asda, owned by US megacorporation Walmart, has won its court battle with a Japanese food company which sued the supermarket chain for calling the artificial sweetener aspartame "nasty".
Ajinomoto Sweeteners, a leading producer of aspartame, took action after Asda announced in 2007 that it would become the first supermarket in Britain to remove artificial colours and flavours from its own brand labels.

In publicity for its "Good for you" range, Asda promised: "No hidden nasties - no artificial colours or flavours, no aspartame and no hydrogenated fats."

Ajinomoto accused Asda at the High Court in London of malicious falsehood and said it was trying to protect the reputation of its products. The firm, who have been given time to consider appealing, has a 45% share of the European aspartame market.

But Mr Justice Tugendhat ruled that the words complained of - on food packaging and a cola drink - did not mean that aspartame was potentially harmful or unhealthy.

- Advertisement -
He said the publicity was trying to convey the message "if you the customer think that aspartame may be bad for you, or unpleasant to taste or consume, then this product is for you".

The judge said Ajinomoto had claimed that the words meant that aspartame is either an especially or potentially harmful and unhealthy sweetener and one which consumers concerned with their health would do well to avoid.

Mr Justice Tugendhat said the case was not just about profits and there was a public interest involved.

"If aspartame is safe, which I have no reason to doubt, then it would be a loss to the public, and deprive them of freedom of choice, if it were to become stigmatised for no good reason."

"No reasonable reader could understand the words as a statement by Asda that all artificial colours and flavours are especially or actually harmful or unhealthy."
____________________________________
Obama's FDA Commissioner, Dr. Margaret Hamburg MD, should be leading the charge to get this neurotoxic carcinogenic artificial sweetener off the market by rescinding its FDA approval. Could you please write a short note to her to ask her to do so, at:
5600 Fisher's Lane, Rockville Maryland. 20857
[1-888-INFO-FDA (1-888-463-6332)]
This chemical's approval was forced in 1981 by Donald Rumsfeld to make him a quick $12-15 million, and it has become the scourge of modern medicine, causing hundreds of thousands of people to develop entirely avoidable neurodegenerative illnesses, just from drinking diet cokes, chewing sugarless gum, not reading the ingredients in their medications or in their children's vitamins, and ingesting Equal in their coffee!
While you are at it, please send a copy of your letter to Dr. Hamburg also to:
1. Dr. Howard Koh, MD, Assistant Secretary of Health and Human Services
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
200 Independence Avenue, S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20201
Telephone: 202-619-0257
Toll Free: 1-877-696-6775
[Dr. Koh oversees the National Institute of Health, the Food and Drug Administration, and the Center for Disease Control, all of which should become active in our effort to rescind the FDA approval for aspartame.
2. Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Human Services
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
200 Independence Avenue, S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20201
3. Both of your United States Senators and your Member of Congress

 

- Advertisement -

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   Supported 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

https://www.facebook.com/groups/592985284186083/

Early in the 2016 Primary campaign, I started a Facebook group: Bernie Sanders: Advice and Strategies to Help Him Win! As the primary season advanced, we shifted the focus to advancing Bernie's legislation in the Senate, particularly the most (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon



Go To Commenting
/* The Petition Site */
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

NYC Council "STANDS UNITED" WITH N.DAKOTA PROTESTERS, 2 new videos of police using pepper spray and rubber bullets

Mirena Interuterine Devices can cause Depression, Mood swings, Acne, Back Pain, Uterine Cysts, and Uterine Perforations

CA Exit Polls reveal 23% Discrepancy; 11 States With Vote "Flipping" Evidence; Our New Directions in American History?

In the California Primary, More Ballots Remain Uncounted than the Total Number of votes for Hillary Clinton!

What does Coca Cola's Dasani bottled water have in common with Death by Lethal Injection?