Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 13 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds    H4'ed 4/27/19

Madhouse

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)     (# of views)   2 comments
- Advertisement -

In his new book, The Fifth Risk, Michael Lewis describes how Donald Trump's disinterest in embracing the usual process of transition from one presidency to the next is problematic. More than problematic, actually; downright dangerous. In fact, to be entirely accurate, potentially catastrophic. Normally a new president elect sends teams of appointees to the fifteen cabinet departments, including Defense, Homeland Security, Agriculture, Commerce and Energy, for briefings, thus to be brought up to speed on what these agencies do day to day. To say "a hellofa lot!" would be vastly to understate the breadth and depth of their impact on society. More or less like equating the effects of an architect making crucial design errors in the construction of skyscrapers with that of a plumber failing to tighten down all the toilets in building bathrooms. But apparently, according to Lewis, the new President does seem in his inner vision of things-governmental precisely so imagine these agencies complexity and their occupants' expertise. Hence he eventually sent a few essentially clueless, often visibly disinterested people for a couple of hours to interact with each department, these encounters resembling not so much briefings as crude assertions of power. The fifth of Lewis's major risks to social stability, consequently, is the potential mis-management of crucial administrative systems by a new president. The easy take-away from his analysis is that the incumbent was a huge mistake. Get rid of him and functionality will return.

But this is not the most rational takeaway from the book. The most rational takeaway is that we now live in a madhouse more or less of the proportions described in Terry Gilliam's classic film "Brazil." Why can any elected official potentially wreak such havoc as Lewis' quite rationally fears? Why can a society even conceivably be placed at great risk simply because critical systems might cease to function because a New-Administrator-In-Chief can't bother to understand what they actually do? Why can such a NAIE wholesale fire experts essential to the systems' functioning, replacing them with appointees whom even if they possess necessary expertise (and often this is highly questionable) are disallowed even to segue with their predecessors? In the suddenly all too imaginable event that the NAIE envisions major departmental transformations, why is he not required to do this according to standards of professionalism prescribed by law? And until these standards are met, why does the law not prescribe that things must continue as previously? And finally, why is failure of a new President to measure-up as AIE according to a specific, legally prescribed time-line, not grounds for mandatory impeachment?

Incompetent presidential managers have certainly wreaked havoc in the past, but constant advances in technology immensely magnify their impact today. So much so that if what Lewis describes is accurate, failure to attend to his fifth risk would be tantamount to living in an asylum populated by pathological reality deniers directly in the path of a whole series of monster tornadoes. Accepting the challenges Lewis poses, it seems to me, implies drastic changes in the organization and structure of progressive social activism today.

- Advertisement -

 

- Advertisement -

Must Read 1   Valuable 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

David Weiner Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

David Weiner received his doctorate in sociology from the University of Texas at Austin in 1964 and subsequently taught at SUNY/Buffalo and The University of Houston, where he received a Teaching Award. He currently teaches community college (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

There is nothing phony about the current war

Can (Mostly White) Haves Annihilate (Mostly Non-White) Have-Nots Without Serious Consequence?

Alienation and Activism

Kindness and Activism

Are we too apathetic to survive?

Thoughts On Charlottesville

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

2 people are discussing this page, with 2 comments


David Weiner

Become a Fan
Author 509614

(Member since Aug 22, 2017), 17 articles, 3 quicklinks, 50 comments, 2 diaries
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

Activism must focus on getting not merely individuals, but movements into office. Those populating such movements must commit not for a year or so of engaement, but forever

Submitted on Saturday, Apr 27, 2019 at 2:41:39 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (1+)
Help
 

James J. H.

Become a Fan
Author 513454

(Member since Apr 27, 2019), 1 comments
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

My only fear is that, according to law, if President Trump is impeached he will immediately be replaced by Mike Pence - potentially an even worse president in my opinion. We would be putting out a bonfire with our bare hands.

Submitted on Saturday, Apr 27, 2019 at 5:35:37 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment