Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 7 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
General News    H3'ed 6/4/19

Let's remove unemployment

By       (Page 1 of 3 pages)     (# of views)   5 comments
Author 513600
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Aleksandar Sarovic
Become a Fan


(Image by Shutterstock)   Details   DMCA
- Advertisement -

This article presents a very simple idea which will eliminate unemployment. It will bring power to the people. It will significantly increase workers' salaries. It will bring justice and growth to the economy. People know nothing about this idea because the rich hide it from the public.

***

The owners of corporations favour unemployment because the unemployed workers are pressured to accept poorly paid jobs to feed their families. A higher unemployment rate produces cheaper labour. The owners of corporations are capable of generating unemployment by influencing the economic policy from importing labour to rising interest rates. It seems that an unemployment rate of about 5% is very convenient for employers and economists have accepted it as a "normal" state. This "normal" state allows the exploitation of workers through low labour costs, while the total workers' purchasing power is still large enough to produce profits for private companies.

- Advertisement -

Today's economy recognizes cyclical, frictional, and structural unemployment. Cyclical unemployment is the result of oscillations in the process of expansion and recession of production, which oscillates demand for work. Some economists realize that the burden of crisis and benefits from profits should be more equally distributed between employers and employees, but they do not know how to implement it.

Frictional unemployment is the result of people willing to move between jobs, careers and locations. Structural unemployment is the consequence of a change in technology, which results in the absence of demand for available workers. These kinds of unemployment are invented by scientists to give students something to learn and are not worth mentioning. Economists today are so indoctrinated with the false teaching that they believe unemployment is the unavoidable price, which must be paid for technological development. They even believe that 0% of unemployment is not a positive thing. I want to stress here that 0% unemployment will solve most of the existing economic problems.

The current philosophy of economics protects capital as the main requirement for the protection of individual economic rights and of society. This is wrong. We need to base the philosophy of economics primarily on equal human rights because people are the main purpose of the economy and are the subjects that the economy cannot exist without. Besides, equal human rights are the condition for creating a good society. This is the foundation of my philosophy.

- Advertisement -

Society regulates freedom if such freedom endangers people. The stronger has no right to endanger the weaker, and if so, the stronger will be legally punished. Can you imagine what life would be like without law governing the rights and obligations of citizens? But there is no such law in the free market economy. A stronger producer might suppress a weaker from the market and thus endanger their survival. If we have adopted laws that prevent a stronger to threaten a weaker in daily life, we need to protect the weaker in the economy as well. But we don't, and this is the reason our society deteriorates.

***

The unemployment of workers cannot form a healthy basis for a good society. A just society requires the availability of work to everyone. If job creation is not needed, full employment will be achieved by reducing the work hours proportionally to the unemployment rate. This is a political measure which needs to be accepted by people and must be enforced in both the public and private enterprises. The regulation of working hours will produce full employment and create a much better economy.

The shortening of working hours will reduce employees' salaries proportionally to the reduction of working hours. For example, an unemployment rate of 10% will shorten the working hours of all workers by 10% and the workers' wages would decrease by 10%. This 10% of the money the companies take from employed workers will be distributed to the newly hired workers. Initially, the full employment will not burden employers with additional labor costs, and all workers would get employed and receive incomes. The previously employed workers would probably perceive the lower wages as a disadvantage, but in the long run, their salaries will significantly grow because in the reduced work market the employers will be forced to increase workers' salaries to be able to keep them.

The shortening of working hours will bring great benefits to society. The lower salaries of workers caused by the elimination of unemployment are not even close as bad as what unemployment brings to workers who receive no salary. Such a measure would guarantee that unemployment and economic insecurity of workers can no longer exist.

People are accustomed to fluctuations in living standards depending on the performance of the economy. The real purchasing power of wages changes more than the unemployment rate due to changes in the market supply and demand, economic crisis, inflation and deflation. Workers silently accept such fluctuations in purchasing power. They accept that they live worse through the crisis. So, why would they not accept this measure in the name of solidarity among workers, which will help them establish a healthy long-term basis to achieve higher standards of living?

- Advertisement -

Shortening work hours proportionally to the rate of unemployment will not only eliminate unemployment, but it will also solve the problem of exploitation. Here is a simple explanation: If there are a total of two workers who apply for a total of one work post, the competition among the workers will reduce the cost of labor so that the worker who gets the job will be exploited. If there is a total of one worker and a total of two jobs, the competition among employers will increase the wage of the worker. Regarding this, the reduction of work hours proportionally to the rate of unemployment will put workers in a better position in the production process. Lower availability of workers will raise the value of the labor of workers and thus, employers would pay workers more than they do today.

Access to the free market is a privilege that society gives to companies, and the companies must pay for this privilege in a way that satisfies society. Increasing the wages of workers will be at the expense of employers. Employers would not like it at the beginning of course, but later they will profit from higher earnings of workers.

Employers must understand that they cannot earn more if there is not a greater consumer purchasing power. They must understand that the purchasing power of society cannot be increased without increasing the wages of workers. They should understand that there is not a better distribution of incomes, neither for employers nor for workers than of the one achieved through a fair labor market.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

- Advertisement -

Must Read 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Aleksandar Sarovic Social Media Pages: Facebook Page       Twitter Page       Linked In Page       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Aleksandar Sarovic is an architect and philosopher who has worked on how to create a good society. According to him, equal human rights will unconditionally do it. The result of his work is presented at his web sites www.sarovic.com and (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Conspiracy of the World Exposed

Let's remove unemployment

The Future of Democracy

Marx Still Prevents the Progress of Society

Sadomasochism Finally Explained

Comments Image Post Article Comment and Rate This Article

These discussions are not moderated. We rely on users to police themselves, and flag inappropriate comments and behavior. In accordance with our Guidelines and Policies, we reserve the right to remove any post at any time for any reason, and will restrict access of registered users who repeatedly violate our terms.

  • OpEdNews welcomes lively, CIVIL discourse. Personal attacks and/or hate speech are not tolerated and may result in banning.
  • Comments should relate to the content above. Irrelevant, off-topic comments are a distraction, and will be removed.
  • By submitting this comment, you agree to all OpEdNews rules, guidelines and policies.
          

Comment Here:   



You can enter 2000 characters. To remove limit, please click here.
Please login or register. Afterwards, your comment will be published.
 
Username
Password

Forgot your password? Click here and we will send an email to the address you used when you registered.
First Name
Last Name

I am at least 16 years of age
(make sure username & password are filled in. Note that username must be an email address.)

3 people are discussing this page, with 5 comments  Post Comment


911TRUTH

Become a Fan
Author 15356

(Member since Apr 29, 2008), 26 fans, 2504 comments
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

I read that in Germany corporations don't have layoffs.

Instead if they have a downturn they'll reduce everyone's salary 'X'% and the government, instead of paying people not to work as in unemployment insurance, will pay that 'X' amount until the company starts making a profit again. By doing this all the workers continue to be able to pay their bills, buy consumer goods, etc instead of being a drag on the economy.

This makes perfect sense, which means it will never happen in this country.

Submitted on Wednesday, Jun 5, 2019 at 4:45:58 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (1+)
Help
 
Indent

Aleksandar Sarovic

Become a Fan
Author 513600
Follow Me on Twitter
(Member since May 24, 2019), 5 articles, 32 comments
Facebook Page Twitter Page Linked In Page Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to 911TRUTH:   New Content

The problem in the US lies in invisible people who rule the US by controlling the presidents and Congress. You call them elite without the first and last name. As long as they are invisible nobody can call them responsible for crimes they commit. This means nothing can prevent crimes, and then, of course, nothing can create good social policy. I think the only escape lies in suing the Presidents for the crimes they committed. If somebody sued George W Bush, the Assange case would not exist today. Even if the court dismisses the lawsuit it is still better than doing nothing. Next time the Presidents would think twice before they wage wars.


Submitted on Wednesday, Jun 5, 2019 at 10:11:36 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (1+)
Help
 
IndentIndent

911TRUTH

Become a Fan
Author 15356

(Member since Apr 29, 2008), 26 fans, 2504 comments
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to Aleksandar Sarovic:   New Content


I've always said that the people we see on TV don't run this country.

Submitted on Thursday, Jun 6, 2019 at 4:03:18 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (1+)
Help
 

Vernon Huffman

Become a Fan
Author 89433

(Member since Aug 14, 2013), 6 fans, 2 articles, 309 comments
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

IMHO, your thinking is sound and your proposals reasonable, if our goal is a productive economy where rich employers treat workers more fairly. On the other hand, if our goal is a healthy ecosystem where all people have an equal voice in the economy, we must change the way money is initially distributed. This means shutting down Fractional Reserve Lending, outlawing usury, radically curtailing military contracting, and instituting a global Universal Basic Income. Our species is on the brink of extinction. Radical economic change is our only hope for survival.

Submitted on Sunday, Jun 9, 2019 at 3:22:52 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 
Indent

Aleksandar Sarovic

Become a Fan
Author 513600
Follow Me on Twitter
(Member since May 24, 2019), 5 articles, 32 comments
Facebook Page Twitter Page Linked In Page Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to Vernon Huffman:   New Content

One measure which may replace all others is a much better choice because it is simpler to accomplish and is harder to prevent.

An equal voice in the economy is not a good idea because it makes incompetent people equal to capable. The idea was nested by Marxism and the result is well known.

There is one even more basic equal human rights idea which will fix all political problems inevitably. It is so unexpected that people will need time to get used to it. Here it is: https://www.opednews.com/articles/The-Future-of-Democracy-by-Aleksandar-Sarovic-Bottom-up_Democracy_Democracy_Democracy-Awakening-190601-351.html

Submitted on Sunday, Jun 9, 2019 at 4:10:33 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment