Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 8 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H4'ed 5/20/09

Let Your Legislators Know How You Feel about Animal Legislation

By       (Page 1 of 3 pages)   5 comments
Message Suzana Megles

(Image by Unknown Owner)   Details   DMCA

I just received the May '09 issue of Animal People. Two headlines immediately caught my eye - "Hurt crabs feel pain" and "India balks at EU mention of animal welfare in trade pact." The second one does not bode well for the animals in India. I also received a legislative guide from Humane Farming. Perhaps by reading through this, you will contact your legislators on behalf of animals. It's just as important to let them know which bills you support, as well as which ones you oppose.

Per Animal People, India resistance to animal welfare is due to the concerted effort of the Indian pharmaceutical industry. They began this effort to undo the favorable January 2002 rulings which former Indian federal animal minister Maneka Gandhi was able to win for the animals in the Supreme Court of India. These allowed her to close five manufacturing firms for violating animal care standards. Sadly, in mid-2002 an alliance of pharmaceutical manufacturers as well as a group of animal sacrifice practitioners were able to push Mrs. Gandhi from office as well as other animal advocates.

Not surprisingly, the proposed regulatory changes are based on the recommendations of "50 top executives of drug makers such as Ranbaxy, Biocon, Wockhardt, Pfizer, Wyeth, and F. Hoffmann La Roche."Â How fragile are the dedicated efforts of compassionate people like Maneka Gandhi?

Regarding the crab headline, Robert Elwood of the School of Biological Sciences at Queen's University in Belfast, Northern Ireland reported on March 17, 2009, "With vertebrates we are asked to err on the side of caution and I believe this is the approach to take with crustaceans."Â

This announcement was followed by something I have waited a long time to hear from a TV reporter: "Ripping the legs off live crabs and crowding lobsters into seafood market tanks are just two of the many practices that may warrant reassessment" warned Jennifer Viegas of the Discovery Channel. I agree. Just this past week when grocery shopping I caught the manager's eye and looking at the lobster tank said, "I don't like this." Of course, he could only shrug his shoulders, and I didn't even wait for a response. What could he say? As long as people have to have lobster- he has to provide these long suffering creatures who are soon to face an even bleaker fate - being dunked into scalding hot water. At least one Cleveland chef said that he pierces the lobster's brain before the dunking to prevent further suffering.

I was once invited to a lobster dinner "treat." Somehow I missed it, and I have always been grateful that I did. And I've never eaten crab either. How can people think that pulling the legs of a live crab is not hurtful? I also read that many of the fish, frogs, crabs, etc. sold in live Chinese markets are horribly manhandled as well.Â

Let's hear it for compassionate handling of live animals. Let your legislators hear from you, too.Â

Humane Farming just mailed its legislative guide. It lists some of the Federal and State governments' bills on animal issues. You may groan when you see it. You may decide that you should skip reading it but -PLEASE DON'T. It took me quite a while to type this and reading each bill -you will come to see just how wonderful some of our legislators are and how terribly unconcern others are.Â

Tomorrow I will tackle the Federal issues since Ohio does not have any bills listed. I am rather tired with all the typing I did to spread the word. I hope that those of you who say you care about animals will take the time and print whatever you can address re these bills. My sister once asked if she should forward a certain post re animals I wrote to those she claims "love" animals. I responded - if people do nothing for the animals --then they really don't love them. By all means Anna - send this post to all the animal lovers you know.

If we want to make compassionate changes for our long-suffering animals, then a step in that direction is addressing the 4 Federal Bills and those bills which apply to the state in which you live.Â

It is incredibly simple to find information re our legislators on the internet so I hope this will not be an excuse for not addressing these issues. This site may be of help-

This Act would help curb the misuse of antibiotics on factory farms and the development of resistant strains of bacteria. Factory farms are able to confine large numbers of animals in squalid indoor facilities only through the continuous use of antibiotics and other drugs. S.619 would help preserve the effectiveness of medically important antibiotics used in the treatment of human and animal diseases.

ACTION: Please contact your senators to ask them to co-sponsor the Preservation of Antibiotics for Medical Treatment Act (S.619) by Senator Edward Kennedy (D-MA). Thank you Sen. Kennedy.

This Act would ban the inhumane transport of our nation's horses to Mexico and Canada for slaughter. This bill is a follow up to last year's legislation that banned the commercial slaughter of American horses for overseas markets. It is now vital that we follow up by passing legislation to protect horses from agonizing journeys across our borders where they are still brutally slaughtered for the horsemeat trade.

ACTION: Please contact your congressperson and senators to ask them to co-sponsor the Prevention of Equine Cruelty Act (H.R. 503 by Rep. John Conyers (D-MI) and S.727 by Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-LA). Thank you Rep. Conyers and Sen. Landrieu.

hat tip to tbknews.blogspot

This ill-intended legislation is designed to shield factory farms from paying potential fees to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Recent studies conclusively show that animal agriculture is responsible for vast amounts of methane and other greenhouse gasses. S.527 is a cynical industry attempt to allow factory farms to further evade environmental accountability.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Must Read 2   Interesting 2   Valuable 2  
Rate It | View Ratings

Suzana Megles Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

I have been concerned about animal suffering ever since
I received my first puppy Peaches in 1975. She made me take a good look at the animal kingdom and I was shocked to see how badly we treat so many animals. At 77, I've been a vegan for the (more...)
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Horse Racing Cruelty

Vote NO on Issue 2 if You Llive in Ohio

Leo Grillo/Delta Rescue

Can Veganism Save the World?

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend