So, as we plainly see exposed to the light of day perhaps a little more clearly than was intended, a Rothschild or Rockefeller or two here and there with a little careful planning and an aide or few can collapse the financial system of the world about our ears and plunge the entire race into social upheaval and ferment, with rich pickings for those quicker-witted with access to the shorting procedures, naked or legit, and a firmer grip on the firmament for the elect.
Similarly, while it may seem desirable if not actually advantageous, that everyone keeps schtum about what really goes on, it requires but an honest man or two of the same stripe, such as Aaron Russo, Norm Finkelstein and Ben Freedman to tell the truth, and all is revealed in starkest reality. But their blatant honesty also makes the discretion of the others seem a bit uniform, no? And those tattle-tales have not even laid tongue on the present excercise yet.
Now, our family have always officially supposed that we were true-blue what we seem, which is none of your business. But there have always been those quiet rumors about 'Uncle Moishe' and a possible diplomatic reason why Cousin So-and-so had dark crinkly hair and was so good at languages and finance. So then, in the interest of our better side and which side it is buttered, we have to face the truth and step out of the closet.
See, some of us, perhaps most of us, must be thinking that discretion has its limits. Global domination is all very dandy, but isn't it a bit risky for the winners, too? Atomic war and even just DU armaments may be all very fine, but aren't there drawbacks for the survivors? I mean, won't we also need access to at least a habitable planet? Properly cooked, grass may be quite tasty as a staple diet, even for years, but if it is also rich in yucky radioactive iodene and stuff?
Therefore, fellow-Yids, what are we going to do about the Rothschild and Rockefeller exercise, and their intended decimation of the rest of the sheep? Clearly they have gone way beyond the bounds of reason if the results of their plans eliminate all the other species as well. So don't we all have to step out of our closets, bare our breasts and break our silence, even if it cramps the style of those who have done us all such good for the last couple of centuries? We have to think in the longer term than just what's good for our collective pocket today and tomorrow. So what can we do that won't bring the rest down on our necks, as seems to be a definite possibility just now if we do and say nothing?
We could all stand up and say the obvious, that one or two of our number may have gone a bit far, otherwise our silence might be taken for assent and collaboration. Fine if there's a border handy, but what they've done is cross-border all the borders except for the beaches, and not all of us can swim or even float.
So suppose we cut our losses, hold all our gains so far and call it quits. To give us breathing space we can offer up the two little Rascals, admit that they've rather over-reached themselves out of youthful folly, settle things in an amicable fashion and trust the dust to settle in the usual way for a few generations.
Agreed? What d'you think? I mean, 700 b. isn't bad, particularly if it's 'at any one time' and without supervision. You can't call that bad.
So, agreed? The two R's can throw themselves on the mercy of the court, plead youthful exuberance, a few b. for the judge, and out by teatime.
What do you think?