Years ago in June 2007 when I realized that the focus of the 9/11 Truth Movement was turning more towards the alleged "Controlled Demolition" of the towers and WTC7, I wrote an article entitled, "This Is Not The Controlled Demolition Movement."
In the article, it says "is that what we're known for? Is that what we're all about? I THINK NOT. However, with all of the attention Controlled Demolition gets within this movement, I can understand why someone might think that. Not the media. Lord knows they've helped to create that appearance with their hit pieces THAT FOCUS SOLELY ON WHETHER OR NOT A MISSILE HIT THE PENTAGON, AND WHETHER OR NOT THE WTC WAS BROUGHT DOWN IN A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION (emphasis mine). It's easier for the media to deal with us if we're only about one or two issues."
Some examples of this are available here (with exceptions for sure on which theories they focus on):
- "Debunking The 9/11 Myths: Special Report" - [Popular Mechanics, 2/2005]
- "Fahrenheit 2777" - [Scientific American, 6/2005]
- "9/11 Bush Bashers" - [World Net Daily, 8/16/2006]
- "Why the 9/11 Conspiracy Theories Won't Go Away" - [Time, 9/3/2006]
- "9/11 fantasists pose a mortal danger to popular oppositional campaigns" - [Guardian, 2/20/2007]
Because the media has attacked, misrepresented and slandered advocates for 9/11 Justice for years, and continue to do so, and continue to use that same formula that attacks the most popular theories of the 9/11 Truth Movement while ignoring some of the most incriminating information, I am 100% certain that advocates for 9/11 Justice are, at some level, right. This should speak volumes to people. That the "methinks thou dost protest too much" mentality of our lapdog media, tells us that people like me (responsible advocates for 9/11 Justice), on some level, are right.
IT SHOULD SPEAK VOLUMES TO PEOPLE!!!