Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 5 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

Israel's Next Move: The Real Danger in the US Decision to Normalize Illegal Jewish Settlements

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
(# of views)   2 comments
Author 1973
Message Ramzy Baroud
Become a Fan
  (5 fans)

From Palestine Chronicle


(Image by You Tube Screenshot)   Details   DMCA

It is hardly a major surprise that the US government has finally decreed that illegal Jewish settlements built in defiance of international law are somehow "consistent" with the said law. US foreign policy has been edging closer towards this conclusion for some time. Since moving into the White House in January 2017, President Donald Trump has unleashed a total and complete reversal of his country's foreign policy regarding Palestine and Israel.

Let us not have any illusion regarding the American approach to the so-called "Israeli-Palestinian conflict" prior to Trump's Presidency, though. The US has never, not even once, stood up for Palestinians or Arabs since the establishment of the State of Israel on the ruins of historic Palestine in 1948. Moreover, Washington has bankrolled the Israeli occupation of Palestine in every possible way, including the subsidizing of the illegal Jewish settlements.

Nevertheless, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo's statement at a press conference on 18 November, "The establishment of Israeli civilian settlements is not, per se, inconsistent with international law" is still very dangerous. In fact, it constitutes a political departure from previous US policies.

How? Historically, Washington has struggled in its understanding of international law, not because of its lack of legal savvy but because, quite often, US interests have clashed with the will of the international community. A recurring case in point is the Israeli occupation of Palestine, where the US has vetoed or voted against numerous UN Security Council and General Assembly resolutions that either criticized Israel or supported the rights of the Palestinians.

Only in 1978 did a US administration dare to describe Israeli settlements as "inconsistent with international law." That happened during Jimmy Carter's Presidency, when Washington began fiddling earnestly with the "peace process" political model, which eventually led to the signing of the Egypt-Israel Peace Treaty at US Presidential retreat Camp David in 1979.

"Since then," Joseph Hincks wrote in Time Magazine online, "Republican and Democratic Presidents have referred to settlements as 'illegitimate' but declined to call them illegal -- a designation that would make them subject to international sanctions."

That said, it was President Ronald Reagan who, although objecting to the principle of the illegality of the settlements, deemed them to be an "obstacle to peace," demanding a freeze on all settlement construction.

Pompeo's statement is, in fact, compatible with Washington's self-contradictions regarding the construction of Israel's illegal settlements in occupied Palestine. In December 2016, the Barack Obama administration declined to veto a UN Security Council resolution that described the settlements as a "flagrant violation" of international law, adding that they have "no legal validity." Although Obama chose to abstain from the vote, that decision was itself seen as a historical departure from traditional US foreign policy-making, further highlighting the US unconditional and, often, blind support for Israel.

While, in some way, the Trump administration's support for Israel is a continuation of the dismal trajectory of American bias, it is also particularly unique and disturbing. Previous US administrations attempted to maintain a degree of balance between their own interests and those of Israel. Trump, on the other hand, seems to have aligned his country's foreign policy regarding Palestine and Israel entirely with that of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his right-wing camp.

Indeed, for over two years, the State Department has been giving Israel political carte blanche, agreeing to all of its demands and expectations and asking for nothing in return. As a result, Washington has accepted Israel's designation of Jerusalem, including occupied East Jerusalem, as its "eternal and undivided capital"; agreed to Israel's sovereignty over the occupied Syrian Golan Heights; and actively plotted to dismiss the issue of Palestinian refugees altogether. The latest announcement by Pompeo was but one of many such steps.

One theory regarding the ongoing surrender of US foreign policy to Israel is that Washington is slowly, but permanently, withdrawing from the Middle East, a process that began in the later years of George W Bush's presidency and continued unabated throughout the two terms of the Obama administration. The current succumbing to Israel's wishes is like America's departing gift to its most faithful ally in the Middle East.

Another explanation is concerned with the apparently defunct "deal of the century," a vaguely defined political doctrine that seeks to normalize relations with Israel, regionally and internationally, while keeping the status quo of its occupation and Apartheid regime untouched.

For that deal to be resurrected after months of inertia, Washington is keen to prolong Netanyahu's premiership, especially as the long-serving Israeli Prime Minister is facing his greatest political challenge and even a possible jail term following various corruption charges.

Currently, Israel is undergoing a political crisis after two General Elections within six months and the possibility of a third coupled with a historic socio-economic and political polarization among the electorate. To keep Netanyahu alive politically, his allies in Washington have thrown him some major lifelines, all in the hope of winning him more support among Israel's dominant right-wing political camp. By rendering the illegal settlements "consistent" with international law, Washington is paving the road for Israel to annex all major settlement blocs in the occupied West Bank, for which Netanyahu will no doubt take the credit.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Rate It | View Ratings

Ramzy Baroud Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Ramzy Baroud is the Managing Editor of Middle East Eye. He is an internationally-syndicated columnist, a media consultant, an author and the founder of PalestineChronicle.com. His latest book is My Father Was a Freedom Fighter: Gaza's Untold (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Obama's Peace Antics in Israel -- Four More Years of This?

What Trump Has Done: The Entire US-Middle East Political Framework Just Collapsed

The Collapse of the Obama Doctrine: Yemen War as an Opportunity?

70 Years of Broken Promises, The Untold Story of Israel's Partition Plan

The Native American, the Palestinian: A Spirited Fight for Justice

Stuck in Area A: How We Were Duped into Disowning the Palestinians

Comments Image Post Article Comment and Rate This Article

These discussions are not moderated. We rely on users to police themselves, and flag inappropriate comments and behavior. In accordance with our Guidelines and Policies, we reserve the right to remove any post at any time for any reason, and will restrict access of registered users who repeatedly violate our terms.

  • OpEdNews welcomes lively, CIVIL discourse. Personal attacks and/or hate speech are not tolerated and may result in banning.
  • Comments should relate to the content above. Irrelevant, off-topic comments are a distraction, and will be removed.
  • By submitting this comment, you agree to all OpEdNews rules, guidelines and policies.
          

Comment Here:   


You can enter 2000 characters. To remove limit, please click here.

Please login or register. Afterwards, your comment will be published.
 

Username
Password

Forgot your password? Click here and we will send an email to the address you used when you registered.
First Name
Last Name

I am at least 16 years of age
(make sure username & password are filled in. Note that username must be an email address.)

2 people are discussing this page, with 2 comments  Post Comment


Leslie Johnson

Become a Fan
Author 500983
Follow Me on Twitter (Member since Dec 9, 2014), 18 fans, 16 articles, 1 quicklinks, 1340 comments, 1 diaries
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content

Interesting. After reading the article, up came a "poll" asking if I support Israel. With Netanyahu in power, I don't. I am in no way anti-semitic but avidly anti-Zionist. I've written about this before and am willing to explain my stance further, if anyone would want to know.

Submitted on Friday, Nov 29, 2019 at 3:43:22 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (1+)
Help

Mohammad Ala

Become a Fan
Author 8028
(Member since Oct 1, 2007), 10 fans, 24 articles, 35 quicklinks, 978 comments, 1 diaries
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content

The UN and the majority of its members are hopeless.

Many nations are NOT acting independently such as Denmark, Sweden, and many others. Just check their UN voting records.

The RULE of FORCE has affected many countries negatively.

Rule of force has replaced the rule of law.

Submitted on Saturday, Nov 30, 2019 at 7:20:37 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment