Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 8 Share on Twitter 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on Reddit Tell A Friend Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

Iowa's Unconstitutional Ag-Gag Law against Undercover Probes and Whistleblowers Tossed out by Federal Judge

By       Message Stephen Fox       (Page 1 of 3 pages)     Permalink    (# of views)   3 comments

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; , Add Tags  (less...)
Add to My Group(s)

Supported 2   Valuable 2   Must Read 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 1/31/19

Author 4578
Become a Fan
  (31 fans)
- Advertisement -

Video: How The Ag Gag Laws Affect Your Food - And Factory Farming

In the discussion of how whistle blowers going under cover are not protected by egregious ag-gag laws, now overturned by a very recent judicial decision by Federal Judge James Gritzner, this is a very important decision, from about three weeks ago. In the state of Iowa, powerful agricultural and animal processing interests used their influence in the legislature and with then Gov. Terry Branstad, in 2012, to pass some very repressive laws that had strongly prohibited undercover probes at many different facilities, called affectionately the "AG-GAG" law. This was recently found to be entirely unconstitutional by a Federal Judge in the Southern District of Iowa.

Iowa's controversial "ag-gag" law, which made undercover investigations by journalists, food safety and labor advocates at slaughterhouses and factory farms illegal, is unconstitutional because it violates free speech rights, a federal judge ruled Wednesday.

- Advertisement -

The "agriculture production facility fraud" measure was passed with bipartisan support in the Iowa Legislature and signed into law by Branstad, who said he favored it because it was "important that we protect farmers from people who are trying to illegally disrupt their operations."

From the Cedar Rapids Gazette, Trish Mehaffy's article:

But animal welfare activists, who were part of a lawsuit filed in 2017, said the law prevented them from documenting cruel and inhumane practices at facilities like farms, slaughterhouses and puppy mills.

In his ruling, U.S. Southern District of Iowa Senior Judge James Gritzner said that when the state seeks to regulate speech, "it bears the heavy burden of showing that the prohibition satisfies constitutional scrutiny." He ruled the state had not met that burden and questioned the state's rationale for justifying the law.

- Advertisement -

Idaho and Utah federal judges also have struck down similar laws.

The suit was brought on behalf of several clients by the ACLU of Iowa, along with the Animal Legal Defense Fund, the Law Offices of Matthew Strugar, Public Justice and the Center for Food Safety.

Two Iowa clients involved are Iowa Citizens for Community Improvement, an organization that says it focuses on factory farms to advance worker justice, and Bailing Out Benji, an organization that says it protects the welfare of dogs.

"An especially grievous harm to our democracy occurs when the government uses the power of the criminal laws to target unpopular speech to protect those with power which is exactly what this law was always about," said Rita Bettis Austen, ACLU of Iowa legal director, in a statement. "It has effectively silenced advocates and ensured that animal cruelty, unsafe food safety practices, environmental hazards, and inhumane working conditions go unreported for years."

The law threatened up to a year in jail for those individuals who use undercover means or provide false identities to document or report on activities in the agricultural animal facilities. In some circumstances, the law criminalized whistle-blowing.

The defendants Gov. Kim Reynolds, Iowa Attorney General Tom Miller and Montgomery County Attorney Bruce Swanson did not met the burden of proof needed to uphold the law, the judge decided. He previously had ruled that it was a "content-based law" one that targets speech based on its content, which is considered unconstitutional but may be justified if the state proves it was narrowly tailored to serve compelling state interests. According to the ruling, the defendants asserted the law protects the state's interests of private property and agriculture biosecurity. They provided statements from lawmakers and Branstad in support of the public purposes.

But the record "makes clear" these were not the only reasons driving the law, the judge noted. Some lawmakers also wanted to stop "subversive acts" by "groups that go out and gin up campaigns " to give the agricultural industry a bad name."

- Advertisement -

Gritzner said the defendants didn't produce any evidence to show that prohibiting rights is necessary to protecting perceived harms to property and biosecurity. There's nothing in the record to show how biosecurity is threatened by a person making a false statement to get access to, or employment in, an ag production facility.

Regarding private property concerns, Gritzner said, there already is a law to prevent individuals from entering a property "without consent of an owner."

In the years leading up to the enactment of the law, there were at least 10 undercover investigations of factory farms in Iowa, according to the ACLU. Since the law passed, there have been no investigations.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

- Advertisement -

Supported 2   Valuable 2   Must Read 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Early in the 2016 Primary campaign, I started a Facebook group: Bernie Sanders: Advice and Strategies to Help Him Win! As the primary season advanced, we shifted the focus to advancing Bernie's legislation in the Senate, particularly the most (more...)
 

Stephen Fox Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

NYC Council "STANDS UNITED" WITH N.DAKOTA PROTESTERS, 2 new videos of police using pepper spray and rubber bullets

Mirena Interuterine Devices can cause Depression, Mood swings, Acne, Back Pain, Uterine Cysts, and Uterine Perforations

Bernie Meets with LA Times Editorial Board (this is the complete transcript!)

CA Exit Polls reveal 23% Discrepancy; 11 States With Vote "Flipping" Evidence; Our New Directions in American History?

What does Coca Cola's Dasani bottled water have in common with Death by Lethal Injection?

In the California Primary, More Ballots Remain Uncounted than the Total Number of votes for Hillary Clinton!

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

2 people are discussing this page, with 3 comments


Stephen Fox

Become a Fan
Author 4578

(Member since Jan 21, 2007), 31 fans, 369 articles, 232 quicklinks, 2747 comments, 14 diaries
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

(Current news coverage in 2012 in the above video)

The proof is in the pudding, so good riddance to a draconian right wing sponsored corporate-manipulated unconstitutional junk law fostered by a six time governor of Iowa, and now Trump's Ambassador to China.

Iowa's Ag-Gag law criminalized undercover investigations at a broad range of animal facilities including factory farms, puppy mills, and slaughterhouses, preventing advocates from exposing animal cruelty and environmental, workers' rights, and food safety violations. The law achieved its goal of suppressing undercover investigations no investigations have taken place since the law's passage in 2012.

Submitted on Thursday, Jan 31, 2019 at 4:14:20 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

Michael Rudnin

Become a Fan
Author 505907

(Member since Jun 13, 2016), 2 comments
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

I'll take good news when I find it ... .apnews.com/baf3b2fa1dae4f518e8e79df32a4bec5 + click here


I believe that factory farming is animal cruelty, an industrialized immorality ... TED talk ... .youtube.com/watch?v=I2pMlY2sJts


Submitted on Friday, Feb 1, 2019 at 6:09:54 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 
Indent

Stephen Fox

Become a Fan
Author 4578

(Member since Jan 21, 2007), 31 fans, 369 articles, 232 quicklinks, 2747 comments, 14 diaries
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to Michael Rudnin:   New Content
Thank you. It really is good news in so many different realms. The next important challenge for this kind of regressive corporate-manipulated law will be in North Carolina.




Submitted on Friday, Feb 1, 2019 at 4:36:18 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment