"Fiction is a bridge to the truth that journalism can't reach." ~~ Hunter Thompson
Recent confusing, obfuscating, and biased reporting coming out of Central Africa in the past month is worthy of Gonzo journalist Hunter Thompson's cynicism.
Leaked documents are quoted by the BBC but not revealed to readers, interest in a new rebel movement in eastern Congo is high, and facts seem hard to find if one believes reports coming from mainstream international media. Speculation about the motives and sources of funding and arms for the M23 rebels has led to increased tensions between Kinshasa and Kigali, especially since the US based Human Rights Watch issued a report on June 4 suggesting that the government of Rwanda was arming the rebels. HRW mistakenly tied the M23 to wanted war criminal Bosco Ntaganda. Despite vehement denials by M23 in an open letter to HRW, this letter has not been reported by the international press. Finally, a confidential dossier compiled by a joint verification team casts serious doubt on the HRW report.
Lake Kivu Between Rwanda and Congo Photo by G. Nienaber
The political fallout has been intense. In a surprisingly cautious move, the US Department of State
The United Nations Mission in Congo (MONUSCO) has denied that it has hard evidence that Rwanda is aiding M23, but mainstream media is reporting the opposite.
The big question is why has the United Stated seemingly turned a cold shoulder to its main ally in the region? Have genocide deniers finally made a dent in US public policy? In October 2004, the US signed what is known as the "tripartite agreement" between the DRC, Rwanda and Uganda to address security issues. Until now, this has been the glue that cements diplomacy.
The US also supported the
The DRC and HRW versions say all recruits are Rwandan citizens, one of the recruits is underage (15), recruitment was conducted in western Rwanda, and there are unrestricted flows of ammo and other military equipment from Rwanda to DRC to arm M23. Reuters is reporting the DRC claims as seen "on television," but there is no report of the JVT dossier which contradicts the DRC side of the story.
Congo's government spokesman Lambert Mende stopped short of accusing Kigali of directly backing the rebels but the charge by Congo's government that rebels had received outside help will strain relations between the former foes.
"The actions carried out by M23 (rebels) are prepared in Rwanda ... The government of (Congo) denounces the passivity of the Rwandan authorities," he said in a speech on state television.
The verification team interview supports Rwanda's side of the story. Readers can review a summary here , and ponder the findings. What follows are some of the highlights and conclusions.
When the eleven subjects described as deserters from M23 gave themselves up to MONUSCO, no fact-finding mission was deployed to investigate the accuracy of their testimonies. No Rwandan official was contacted to assist in the verifications, and their alleged recruitment in was not verified in their alleged communities of origin.
Because of these oversights, it was impossible to determine whether the "defectors" alleged itinerary from the M23-controlled area to the MONUSCO position in Rugari in the time frame involved was technically conceivable.
Another revelation is almost laughable, if the consequences of fiction were not so dire.
Several elements in the subjects' testimonies would not survive script continuity in a very bad movie.