Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 32 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 5/2/13

Indeed, "Why are we doing this?"

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)   4 comments
Message Dave Lefcourt
Become a Fan
  (21 fans)





From Inside JTF Guantanamo Camps 5 & 6 [Image 1 of 23]
Detainee being held at Guantanmamo Prison complex
Inside JTF Guantanamo Camps 5 & 6 [Image 1 of 23] Detainee being held at Guantanmamo Prison complex by DVIDSHUB

Detainee being held at Guantanamo Prison complex




America's prime example of horrific, wrongful policy, the Guantanamo detention facility, is back in the headlines as many of those detained and held indefinitely, have staged a hunger strike that began in February.

This has caused President Obama to say of the facility, "It's not sustainable. The notion that we're going to keep 100 individuals in no man's land in perpetuity made no sense. All of us should reflect on why exactly are we doing this? Why are we doing this?

Indeed, why are we doing this!

Initiated by the Bush administration as part of its "war on terror" the facility is a direct affront to due process, by holding suspects indefinitely without charges until the "end of hostilities", a fig leaf of extra-legal cover that has kept these men locked away some since 2001.

One of the detainees, Moath Hamza Ahmed al-Alwi from Yemen, who has not eaten in 80 days put it succinctly, "I don't want to kill myself. My religion prohibits suicide. But I will not eat or drink until I die, if necessary, to protest the injustice of this place. We want to get out of this place. It is though this government wishes to smother us in this injustice, to kill us slowly here indirectly, without trying us or executing us." Alwi is being force-fed twice a day after being tied to a restraint chair.

In a further affront to these men, a "Military Policy Directive" states, "In the case of a hunger strike, attempted suicide or other attempted serious self harm, medical treatment or intervention may be directed without the consent of the detainee".

However, the president of the American Medical Association, Dr. Jeremy A. Lazarus, in a letter to Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel put it this way, "Any doctor who participated in forcing a prisoner to eat against his will was violating core ethical values of the medical profession. Every competent patient has the right to refuse nourishment, including life sustaining intervention."

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   Supported 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Dave Lefcourt Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

An Ominous Foreboding, Israel vs Iran

The Evolving Populist Political Rebellion in the Arab World

A Nuclear War Would Be Insane

The Rich Get Richer, the Poor Get Poorer, While the Middle Class Gets Decimated

CIA in the Crosshairs

Iran Offers 9 Point Plan to end Nuclear Crisis, U.S. "No thanks".

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend