Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 6 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 10/27/19

In Syria "Withdrawal," Less is Probably More

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)     (# of views)   2 comments
Author 76576
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Thomas Knapp

Destroyed neighborhood in Raqqa.
Destroyed neighborhood in Raqqa.
(Image by Wikipedia (commons.wikimedia.org))
  Details   DMCA

When US president Donald Trump announced his plan to relocate a few dozen US soldiers in Syria -- getting them out of the way of a pending Turkish invasion -- the Washington establishment exploded in rage at what it mis-characterized as a US "withdrawal" from Syria.

Instead of fighting that mis-characterization, Trump embraced it, pretending that an actual withdrawal was in progress and announcing on October 9 that "we're bringing our folks back home. "

If he's telling the truth, hooray! But so far as I can discern, no, he isn't telling the truth.

Since taking office (after campaigning on getting the US out of military quagmires in the Middle East and Central Asia), Trump has boosted US troop levels in Syria from 500 or fewer under Barack Obama to at least 2,000 and possibly as many as 4,000.

Even at its most ambitious, the supposed US "withdrawal" from Syria consisted of moving a few hundred soldiers across the border into Iraq, from which they could launch operations in Syria at will.

The Iraqi government objected to hosting more US troops on its soil, so now the plan has changed to deploying elements of an armored brigade combat team ("less than a battalion," so call it "less than a thousand troops" depending on what kind of battalion) to protect Syrian oil fields from the Islamic State (and from Syria's own government).

Exactly how many US soldiers, sailors, airmen, and Marines were in Syria prior to the supposed withdrawal? How many are there now? How many will be there by the end of the year?

That's hard to say with any exactitude. Over the last several years (and not just on Trump's watch), the US government's troop level claims have become less specific and more general, less matters of public record and more notional state secrets.

But so far, according to those claims, Trump has escalated US involvement in every conflict he inherited from Obama, even after promising to do the opposite and even while pretending to do the opposite.

If past performance is an indicator of future results, what's going on in Syria isn't a US withdrawal at all. Instead of US forces departing the country, more troops and heavier weapons seem to be flowing into the country (and the region, including B-1B bombers to Saudi Arabia).

Will Trump's non-interventionist supporters finally notice or admit that, as usual, his rhetoric and his actions don't match? Fat chance.

 

Well Said 2   Supported 2   Must Read 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Thomas Knapp Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Thomas L. Knapp is director and senior news analyst at the William Lloyd Garrison Center for Libertarian Advocacy Journalism (thegarrisoncenter.org). He lives and works in north central Florida.


Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Hypocrisy Alert: Republicans Agreed with Ocasio-Cortez Until About One Minute Ago

Finally, Evidence of Russian Election Meddling ... Oh, Wait

Chickenhawk Donald: A Complete and Total Disgrace

The Nunes Memo Only Partially "Vindicates" Trump, But it Fully Indicts the FBI and the FISA Court

Aircraft Carriers: Give Truman and Ford a Burial at Sea

Political Parties Should Say What They Mean. The Libertarian Party Does.

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

2 people are discussing this page, with 2 comments


shad williams

Become a Fan
Author 63282
(Member since Apr 13, 2011), 24 fans, 65 articles, 10 quicklinks, 3139 comments, 2 diaries
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content
Over the last several years (and not just on Trump's watch), the US government's troop level claims have become less specific and more general, less matters of public record and more notional state secrets.

Nicely put. Not only that, there are also the troops of the private mercenary corporations and the many factions of "moderate" head chopping terrorists, Mossad and GCC terrorists, and less we forget, CIA and Pentagon terrorists to fill out the herd.

I noticed the not just on Trump's watch tag - not quite sure who is getting props here, certainly not Mr. We are leaving and coming home, Trump, who if not for the electors would lose in a landslide if he ran today? Otherwise the US is carrying on as usual without the masks of the fake left and liberals who love war mongering.

Submitted on Wednesday, Oct 30, 2019 at 3:21:58 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
Indent

Thomas Knapp

Become a Fan
Author 76576
Follow Me on Twitter
(Member since Feb 15, 2012), 7 fans, 462 articles, 749 comments, 2 diaries
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Reply to shad williams:   New Content

Yeah, I should have made space to mention the displacement of "troops" by "contractors." That seems to be a major factor in "troop levels."


Sometimes when I muse about going back to a "day job," I consider one of the "security guard" positions in Afghanistan. Must be able to sit and stay awake for 10 hour shifts, and operate an M-60 machine gun. I'm more used to walking four-hour posts with an M-16 or sitting them with a SAW, but heck, I didn't get paid $70k a year to do that.


"I noticed the not just on Trump's watch tag - not quite sure who is getting props here"


The non-transparency concerning troop levels has always been around in this or that way and to this or that degree, but Obama was pretty cagey in the 'replace troops with contractors, be vague about troop levels" category. More so than Bush is my impression.

Submitted on Wednesday, Oct 30, 2019 at 4:14:26 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment