Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn Share on Reddit Tell A Friend Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites
OpEdNews Op Eds

Improving FEMA

By       Message Harold Novikoff       (Page 1 of 1 pages)     Permalink    (# of views)   3 comments

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H2 9/14/18

Author 92139
Become a Fan
  (1 fan)

From Free photo Hurricane Devastation Natural Disaster Destruction
From Free photo Hurricane Devastation Natural Disaster Destruction
(Image by
  Permission   Details   DMCA
- Advertisement -

As Hurricane Florence approaches the Carolina/Virginia coast, we hold our breath in expectation of widespread destruction and losses on the order of last storm-season's devastation. FEMA's readiness and capacity to deal with relief efforts and the ubiquitous damage similar to that of last year's unusually intensive hurricanes is the subject of widespread concern and doubt.

This is not only a political issue for the Trump administration. The lingering effects of past hurricanes - Katrina, which overwhelmed Louisiana in 2005 and Sandy, which ravaged New York and much of the Northeast in 2012 - were never fully cleaned-up or compensated. And the people of Puerto Rico are still bailing out from last year's Hurricane Maria.

As the effects of global warming become more evident and undeniable, according to projections of increasing intensity of storms, among other major factors, it will become obvious that much greater physical, human, and financial resources will have to be dedicated to dealing with the situations. FEMA, as presently structured, will not be able to cope, especially with simultaneous disasters.

In other countries dealing with national disasters, the military plays a major role in carrying out relief efforts. To what extent the military may be involved, actually or potentially, in the operations of FEMA I do not know. But to be more fully capable to respond to these disasters, would require a reserve potential that only our military forces are ready to supply.

- Advertisement -

Our constitutional purpose is to insure domestic tranquillity, provide for the common defense, and to promote the general welfare, all of which would apply to natural disasters. Our military, as a means to these purposes, should be utilized in the work of FEMA. The military should be fully trained and prepared to participate in national disaster relief as a major reason for its existence. National security related to natural disasters should have a far higher priority than optional military operations serving the obscure interests of inner circles of government.


- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

Veteran, retired from several occupations (school teacher, technical writer, energy conservation business, etc.) long-time Sierra Club member

Harold Novikoff Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Wild Fires

The Motive Behind Global-Warming Denial

Is Democracy Obsolete?

Dark Matters: The Science/Industrial Complex

High Crime in the U.S. Senate

The Lost Century