Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Poll Analyses
Share on Facebook 25 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H2'ed 9/14/18

Improving FEMA

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages) (View How Many People Read This)   3 comments
Author 92139
Message Harold Novikoff
Become a Fan
  (1 fan)

From maxpixel.net: Free photo Hurricane Devastation Natural Disaster Destruction
From maxpixel.net: Free photo Hurricane Devastation Natural Disaster Destruction
(Image by maxpixel.net)
  Details   DMCA

As Hurricane Florence approaches the Carolina/Virginia coast, we hold our breath in expectation of widespread destruction and losses on the order of last storm-season's devastation. FEMA's readiness and capacity to deal with relief efforts and the ubiquitous damage similar to that of last year's unusually intensive hurricanes is the subject of widespread concern and doubt.

This is not only a political issue for the Trump administration. The lingering effects of past hurricanes - Katrina, which overwhelmed Louisiana in 2005 and Sandy, which ravaged New York and much of the Northeast in 2012 - were never fully cleaned-up or compensated. And the people of Puerto Rico are still bailing out from last year's Hurricane Maria.

As the effects of global warming become more evident and undeniable, according to projections of increasing intensity of storms, among other major factors, it will become obvious that much greater physical, human, and financial resources will have to be dedicated to dealing with the situations. FEMA, as presently structured, will not be able to cope, especially with simultaneous disasters.

In other countries dealing with national disasters, the military plays a major role in carrying out relief efforts. To what extent the military may be involved, actually or potentially, in the operations of FEMA I do not know. But to be more fully capable to respond to these disasters, would require a reserve potential that only our military forces are ready to supply.

Our constitutional purpose is to insure domestic tranquillity, provide for the common defense, and to promote the general welfare, all of which would apply to natural disasters. Our military, as a means to these purposes, should be utilized in the work of FEMA. The military should be fully trained and prepared to participate in national disaster relief as a major reason for its existence. National security related to natural disasters should have a far higher priority than optional military operations serving the obscure interests of inner circles of government.

 

Rate It | View Ratings

Harold Novikoff Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Veteran, retired from several occupations (school teacher, technical writer, energy conservation business, etc.) long-time Sierra Club member


Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Wild Fires

The Motive Behind Global-Warming Denial

Is Democracy Obsolete?

Tulsi on Impeachment

High Crime in the U.S. Senate

Dark Matters: The Science/Industrial Complex

To View Comments or Join the Conversation: