Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 3 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

If we are what we buy, we should buy cruelty-free

By Ann Marie Dori  Posted by People For The Ethical Treatment Of Animals (about the submitter)       (Page 1 of 1 pages)   1 comment
Follow Me on Twitter     Message People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals

In his new book Snoop: What Your Stuff Says About You, psychologist Sam Gosling reveals how poking around other people’s possessions can offer insights into their personalities. The University of Texas professor sent teams of grad students into strangers’ dorm rooms and offices to analyze their bookshelves, posters, shoes, stuffed animals, CDs and other belongings. All of this stuff, he claims, can tell snoopers whether you are inviting or anxious, cheerful or cranky.  

Big deal. I can suss out the “real you” just by asking what brands of dish soap and toothpaste you buy.

If you answer Method and Tom’s of Maine, for example, you are a kind soul who cares deeply about the suffering of others. How do I know? Because neither of these companies blinds bunnies in animal-testing laboratories.


It’s hard to believe that in this day and age—when hundreds of responsible companies have banned animal tests forever—some manufacturers are still needlessly maiming and killing animals to test their products. Rats, mice, guinea pigs, rabbits and other animals are forced to swallow or inhale massive quantities of a test substance or endure the pain of a chemical eating away at their eyes or skin. Some tests, such as the now infamous lethal dose 50 (LD50) test, continue until a predetermined percentage of the animals die.


Animal tests are not required by law, and they often produce inaccurate or misleading results—even if a product has blinded an animal, it can still be marketed to consumers. Fortunately, the number of forward-thinking companies continues to grow, as more and more manufacturers reject cruel and crude animal tests—relics of the 1920s—and opt instead for modern, sophisticated techniques to test the safety of their products. These new test methods are accurate and fast—and no one gets hurt.


Chemical corrosivity, for example, can now be evaluated using a “human skin equivalent” test called Corrositex, approved by federal officials, which uses a protein membrane designed to function like skin. The Irritation Assay System, a simple test-tube procedure that is used by many personal-care companies, has spared millions of animals from painful eye- and skin-irritation tests. TOPKAT is a software package that analyzes the chemical and physical structures of substances to predict toxicity and skin and eye irritation. It is used by the FDA, the EPA and the U.S. Army.


Government regulators in Canada accept the use of a skin-patch test in human volunteers as a valid replacement for skin irritation studies on animals. And human patch tests offer the added benefit of being directly relevant to people—not just relevant to rabbits.


Now that hundreds of companies are refusing to test their products on animals—Avon, Revlon, The Body Shop, Mrs. Meyer’s Clean Day and Seventh Generation are just a few—there’s no reason for others to continue using outdated blinding and poisoning tests. And there’s certainly no reason for consumers to buy cruelly produced products. Information about which companies do—and which do not—conduct animal testing is easy to find online at sites like


If we are what we buy, as Snoop suggests, then shouldn’t we all be buying cruelty-free? After all, the next time someone pokes around in your medicine cabinet, don’t you want them to know that you care about more than just the latest shade of lipstick?

  Ann Marie Dori is the Caring Consumer Project coordinator for People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), 501 Front St., Norfolk, VA 23510;
Rate It | View Ratings

People For The Ethical Treatment Of Animals Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), with 6.5 million members and supporters, is the largest animal rights organization in the world. PETA focuses its attention on the four areas in which the largest numbers of animals suffer the (more...)

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines

Contact EditorContact Editor
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Dolphins in tanks: Cruel confinement

Don't turn your back on feral cats

Protecting animals protects everyone

What a horrific cruelty case can teach us

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend