Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 16 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H2'ed 6/28/19

How We Are All Climate Change Deniers

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)     (# of views)   5 comments
Author 513617
Message Kollibri terre Sonnenblume
Become a Fan
  (1 fan)

Climate Heating
Climate Heating
(Image by Avidor)
  Details   DMCA
- Advertisement -

Recent polls have shown that the number of US citizens who believe in climate change is rising (see here, here, and here). These numbers have been hailed as positive even as "a new era of public concern about climate change" and they are positive, as far as such things go (with US Americans ranking 3rd in the world for climate change denial). They reflect media coverage of extreme climate events all over the world and the well-publicized predictions of respected organizations that are projecting disaster within thirty, twelve, or even five years. However, it's also true that these percentages go up and down over time and that once current storylines run their course and summer is over in the northern hemisphere the rise in numbers will prove to be soft.

But "soft" is also how we could describe belief in climate change in the US in general. Regardless of claims made to pollsters, virtually all of us both socially (which is increasingly online) and to ourselves (more importantly)are actually climate change deniers when the rubber hits the road.

An apt expression, we might say, since we all need to stop driving.

- Advertisement -

That wasn't intentional, but yes, let's start there.

If we were serious about climate change"

Our society and our everyday lives would look much much different if we were truly attempting to address the enormous phenomena that is climate change.

About cars: all unnecessary travel dependent on fossil fuels must cease immediately. For the time being, the warehouse-on-wheels that delivers our food supply needs to keep running; remaking our agricultural system so that communities are providing for themselves locally is a process that will not happen overnight, or in one season. But the culture of individual car-driving as necessity (and plane travel as privilege) must end.

- Advertisement -

That in itself is a major conversion. Our sprawling urban environments are not set up for walking and biking and not a single city in the US can boast of an adequate public transportation system. How will people go to the store? How will they visit a doctor? How will they get to work?

Aah, work. That's gotta go too. No t labor, mind you. There's a tremendous amount of that, what with the need to radically transform the food system and the built environment (which are just starting points). But most jobs are not merely useless, they're part of the problem: making things we don't need, providing services that are superfluous, and contributing to the collective carbon footprint.

But what about rent? The mortgage? The car loan, student debt, and credit card balance? Guess what? They're abolished too. We don't have the time or resources to pour even one more drop into those money pits. The folks who were making their living off these and other "financial services" (i.e., banking, investing, insurance, real estate) will be infinitely more useful to society when they're hoeing gardens, repairing bicycles, and best of all planting trees.

That's a big one: reforestation. We really can't plant too many trees. Yes, they are the perfect carbon-sequestration mechanisms; yes, they deliver other "ecosystem services" in terms of moisture, erosion and biodiversity; yes, they could provide human sustenance as intentionally designed polycultures. On top of all that, and at heart, by planting trees we will resume a relationship an aware connection with nature that we severed by choice and in so doing, we will reconfigure our senses and our outlooks, both as individuals and collectively.

Now we're talking. Or rather, if we get this far, now we're finally moving beyond words and ideas and now we're genuinely living; being and doing in conscious interrelationship with our environment; dropping our dominating ways and re-entering the real world.

The honest to goodness "real world": where everyone else has been this whole time, btw.

- Advertisement -

The birds never lived in denial. Or the insects and the other animals. Or the trees, the flowers, or the fungus. Not the rivers, wind and rocks. Only us humans checked out for a minute there maybe starting with fire, but certainly with the plow, and in the worst way yet with Capital but we've got to drop all that sh*t and get back to peaceful coexistence. Like, yesterday.

The exact methods and timing of these massive transitions will depend on logistical considerations and on circumstances in flux, so we will be making much of it up as we go along. As such, our path cannot be more than generally outlined ahead of time. But we know that it will be all about keeping in focus our endpoint: a completely refashioned society, totally unrecognizable from our own, operating on an altogether different set of principles. At the foundation of this will be honesty, the opposite of denial.

Here we are, back at denial.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

- Advertisement -

Rate It | View Ratings

Kollibri terre Sonnenblume Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Kollibri terre Sonnenblume is a writer, photographer, tree hugger, animal lover, and dissident. Kollibri's work can be found at http://www.macskamoksha.com."



Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Climate Change: Why is it so often "sooner than predicted"?

Do we need a dictatorship to respond to Climate Change?

Forgiving Debt to Invest in Environmental Healing

Assange Indictments are not about Assange: Democrats Need to Drop their Hate and Support him

We Need to Stop Believing in "Belief"

How We Are All Climate Change Deniers

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

4 people are discussing this page, with 5 comments


Charles Homer

Become a Fan
Author 511996

(Member since Aug 27, 2018), 1 fan, 120 comments
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

Here is an interesting look at one source of greenhouse gas emissions that almost never gets mentioned in the mainstream media:

click here

The gasses emitted by this source will be extremely difficult to reduce given our penchant for consumption.

Submitted on Friday, Jun 28, 2019 at 2:07:56 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (1+)
Help
 

Don Smith

Become a Fan
(Member since Feb 25, 2009), 23 fans, 137 articles, 581 quicklinks, 1770 comments, 45 diaries
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

Given the damage that fossil fuel-powered cars do to our lungs, our overall health, our ecosystem, and the climate, driving a car is about as ethical as smoking in an infant nursery. Have you seen the many articles describing the deleterious effects of auto pollution on our health? Thirty years ago, it was considered acceptable to smoke cigarettes in a restaurant. That's no longer the case in most places. The same should hold true of driving a fossil fuel-powered car. But that will require major changes to society.

Submitted on Friday, Jun 28, 2019 at 6:54:07 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 
Indent

Janet Supriano

Become a Fan
Author 90270

(Member since Oct 7, 2013), 12 fans, 1779 comments
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to Don Smith:   New Content

I think we're caught in a Catch 22.

Yes, major societal changes are required; dubiously assuming we have time. Yet all the while we clamor for these changes, the Power factions already have the U.N. Agenda 21/2030 rolling out across the world.

I think we've lost this round.

Submitted on Friday, Jun 28, 2019 at 9:10:18 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (1+)
Help
 
IndentIndent

David Watts

Become a Fan
Author 10429

(Member since Jan 31, 2008), 12 fans, 18 articles, 26 quicklinks, 2097 comments, 27 diaries
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to Janet Supriano:   New Content

You think we lost this round? Will it be a first round knockout?

Submitted on Saturday, Jun 29, 2019 at 3:53:55 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 
IndentIndentIndent

Janet Supriano

Become a Fan
Author 90270

(Member since Oct 7, 2013), 12 fans, 1779 comments
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to David Watts:   New Content

I'm 99% sure it's a knockout, alright. Fight over. Grab your jacket.

Just not sure if it's our first go-round. The older I get; the more I hear; the more I read.....the less I know about this 'reality.'

Submitted on Sunday, Jun 30, 2019 at 2:27:32 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment