Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter 3 Share on LinkedIn Share on Reddit Tell A Friend Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites
OpEdNews Op Eds

How The Filibuster Happened By Accident [A Defect In The Rules, Part 1]

By       Message The Pen       (Page 1 of 1 pages)     Permalink    (# of views)   5 comments

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H2 11/30/12

Author 24
- Advertisement -

(Article changed on November 30, 2012 at 15:35)

Senate Republican filibuster everything
(Image by The People Lobby)
  Permission   Details   DMCA

- Advertisement -
This is the first of a multi-part series.  We have done some intensive research on how the filibuster came into accidental existence in the history of the Senate, and can report all the accurate facts to you now.

There is a strong movement to really Stop The Filibuster this time.  We already have more than 13,000 submissions on the action page. Now is the time to really jump on and push this one over the top.

Stop The Filibuster action page:

- Advertisement -
And it is critically important for every one of our participants who is active on Facebook to go to the new Facebook page, The People Lobby, and SHARE a post with the action page link to all your Facebook friends. Only by actively sharing something a high percentage of times you visit the page can we really ignite the social media effect on this.

The People Lobby page on Facebook:

Many are under the mistaken belief that our founding fathers intended for a minority to be able to filibuster anything, some kind of extra protection for the minority. Nothing could be further from the truth.  The original Senate rules provided for a procedure of "calling the question" which was a way for a simple majority to call for end of debate. The Continental Congress had this embodied in Rule 10, which derived from British parliamentary practice.

It should also be noted that the rights of the minority, in the case of the less populated states, was already protected by the Great Compromise of 1787, with provided each state with the same number of senators, regardless of population.

But in those days, our founding fathers were gentlemen, and would never have used a procedural rule for brazenly dilitory purposes or just to obstruct. The rule providing for calling the question was used so few times in the early days that in 1806 Aaron Burr proposed just dropping it, and so it was dropped by simple majority vote.

It was not until at least 30 years later in 1837 (some say 1841), that some perverse senators got the idea that they could exploit the lack of a rule to allow cutting off debate to literally talk forever, as a means of holding the Senate hostage to an ultimatum of the minority. And even at that there were relatively few filibusters.  Only 33 in the 77 years from 1840 to 1917. And that is when the situation became critical.
- Advertisement -

There was a filibuster of 23 days against a bill to arm American merchant ships to be able to protect themselves in the aftermath of the sinking of the Lusitania by a German U-Boat. And that crisis led to the enactment of the first cloture rule (to cut off debate unfortunately by way of supermajority), at best a PARTIAL restoration of what had been lost by the careless discontinuation of the original "calling the question" procedure by simple majority vote.

So in fact, and again contrary to much misconception, there has never been a Senate rule "authorizing" a filibuster. There have only been repeated attempts to reign in the obstructionist abuse as it became more and more outrageous and frequent over the years.

We are once again at such a point, where the Republican party has so little left of gentlemen in them that they are determined to filibuster literally everything, a new tyranny of the minority. And once again the majority in the Senate can act to change to rules address this new level of sheer legislative spite, if only we empower them with the political will of our action page submissions.

Please stay tuned, because in the next part we will share more valuable insights into how this all really happened, and exactly what we must now do to fix our modern broken Congress, which would trying bring tears to the eyes of our founding fathers.


- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

The Pen is a real person, and the creator of UTalk, a revolutionary new internet radio interface, to make advocacy messages as facile and easy as possible. With this goal in mind we pioneered one click action pages in the political realm, now (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon Share Author on Social Media   Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Democratic Party's Plan To THROW The Next Couple Elections

They've Literally Punched A Hole Into Hell, We Need A Crash Alternative Energy Program Now, Assuming We Even Survive

If You Are Not Angry About The Democratic Platform TPP Scam You Are Not Paying Attention

A Supreme Act Of Judicial Treason Against The People Of The United States, And What We Can And Must Do About It

Obama's New "Improved" Leech Therapy

The President Can And Must Invoke 31 USC 3102 To Pay Our National Debts