Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn Share on Reddit Tell A Friend Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

Heroic GOP War Critic -- Traitor or Patriot?

By       Message Robert S. Becker       (Page 1 of 4 pages)     Permalink    (# of views)   17 comments

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...)
Add to My Group(s)

Supported 3   Must Read 2   Well Said 2  
View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H2 12/10/10

Author 50212
Become a Fan
  (35 fans)
- Advertisement -

Since Rep. Ron Paul of Texas is that rarest of Republicans -- a war critic who's both rational and prescient describing our careening, imperial foreign policy, let us openly address his probing questions (italics) Friday on the House floor.   In defending Wikileaks disclosures, Paul proclaims what should never be forgotten (but is, every day):


Just as with the Vietnam War, the Iraq War was based on lies. We were never threatened by weapons of mass destruction, nor al Qaeda in Iraq, though the attack on Iraq was based on this false information. Any information which challenges the official propaganda for the war in the Middle East is unwelcome by the administration and the supporters of these unnecessary wars.

- Advertisement -


Number 1: Do the America People deserve to know the truth regarding the ongoing wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan and Yemen?


- Advertisement -

The phrase, "American People," is a figment of the imagination, manufactured on the spot to justify whatever one believes.  Deserve ?  Not by electing hacks.  Truth, even after ten years?  Forget it.  What U.S. government since Lincoln has honored the public with transparency, let alone "truth" on wars (except FDR).  Not Teddy Roosevelt (modern imperialism), Truman (Korea, line in the sand), JFK/LBJ/Nixon (Vietnam), through Iraq, Afghanistan, Yemen and outliers we've not yet heard about.  It's way easier to argue downright LYING, rather than truth, drives presidents to sell invasions (including the Afghan surge against "terrorists"). 


So, Rep. Paul, how's your "truthiness" going -- posing the same blunt, unanswered questions without policy change for ten straight years?


Number 2: Could a larger question be how can an army private access so much secret information?


- Advertisement -

Actually, it's a smaller question.  You can ask, but digital information is hard to protect, especially when not "top secret."  The only way to protect all such information is to massively reduce government transparency, already abysmally low, thus making officials more paranoid about the gross distortions and half-truths they deign to afflict on the public. Great solution.


Number 3: Why is the hostility mostly directed at Assange, the publisher, and not at our government's failure to protect classified information?

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4


- Advertisement -

Supported 3   Must Read 2   Well Said 2  
View Ratings | Rate It

For a decade, Robert S. Becker's rebel-rousing essays on politics and culture analyze overall trends, messaging and frameworks, now featured author at OpEdNews, Nation of Change and RSN. He appears regularly at Dissident Voice, with credits (more...)

Robert S. Becker Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Summer in the GOP Asylum: "Who are these guys?"

Deadline Looms To Fund Critical Ocean Plastic-Trash Film

Trickle-down Gulf Wreck-onomics

"Apocalypse Now' Vogue Engulfs Chicken Littles

Moses Kaput -- Rightwing Ten Commandments To Serve Looming Theocracy

"God Particle' Refudiates the Religious Right