Power of Story Send a Tweet        

Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (2 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   2 comments
OpEdNews Op Eds

Health Care Under Fire

By       Message Jim Hightower       (Page 1 of 1 pages)     Permalink

Related Topic(s): , Add Tags  Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 3/11/15

Author 8272
Become a Fan
  (41 fans)
- Advertisement -

Reprinted from Other Words

The Supreme Court is riddling the Affordable Care Act with potshots

(Image by DonkeyHotey / Flickr)   Permission   Details   DMCA
- Advertisement -

Look out, the Supreme Court's black-robed gang of far-right ideologues is rampaging again.

The Supreme clan is firing potshots at the Affordable Care Act. Caught in the crossfire is the court's own integrity, along with the health of millions of innocent bystanders.

- Advertisement -

In an attempt to override the law, these so-called "justices" have jumped on a wagonload of legalistic bovine excrement called King v. Burwell.

This case is a very rickety legal vehicle. It sprang from a frivolous lawsuit financed by the Competitive Enterprise Institute, a front group for oligarchs like the Koch brothers, Big Oil, Big Tobacco, and Big Pharma.

The chairman of the group bluntly described the suit as a raw political assault on Obamacare: "This bastard has to be killed as a matter of political hygiene," he howled. "I do not care how this is done, whether it's dismembered, whether we drive a stake through its heart," or "whether we strangle it."

So much for the lawsuit's intellectual depth. The lawyers on this case fabricated it on a nitpicking interpretation of only four words in Affordable Care Act's 906 pages of text.

They claim that now widespread health insurance subsidies constitute an illegal, backdoor bribe to "force" every state to allow people access to a federal benefit they otherwise couldn't afford. They want to eliminate federal health subsidies to people who live in states that have refused to set up their own exchanges.

The lower courts rejected that right-wing tommyrot. Nonetheless, the gang of Supremes grabbed the case as a chance to wreak their own brand of ideological havoc on a law some of them personally dislike.

- Advertisement -

By taking this case, these Republican judges have openly become partisans, thrusting the Supreme Court itself into the forefront of the GOP's war on making health care more widely available -- and against Obama himself.


- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It


Jim Hightower is an American populist, spreading his message of democratic hope via national radio commentaries, columns, books, his award-winning monthly newsletter (The Hightower Lowdown) and barnstorming tours all across America.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon Share Author on Social Media   Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): , Add Tags
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Trans-Pacific Partnership is not about free trade. It's a corporate coup d'etat -- against us!

The Post Office is not broke -- and it hasn't taken any of our tax money since 1971

The plutocrats who bankrolled the GOP primaries -- and what they want in return

Citizens United Against Citizens United: A Grassroots Campaign to Restore Democracy

The Audacity of Greed

The Trans-Pacific Trade Scam