Power of Story Send a Tweet        
- Advertisement -

Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 2 Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend (3 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   3 comments
OpEdNews Op Eds

Hannity Audio: The 47% Will Still Vote For Romney and "Everything Else He Says Is Correct"

By   Follow Me on Twitter     Message Gustav Wynn       (Page 1 of 3 pages)     Permalink

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 11/3/12

Become a Fan
  (23 fans)
- Advertisement -

Hannity's America
(Image by gw)
  Permission   Details   DMCA

On the same day Mother Jones released the full 50 minutes of footage of Mitt Romney speaking at an exclusive fundraiser, Sean Hannity was in serious damage control mode. For days he'd been trying to tamp down the firestorm surrounding a short "preview" clip in which Romney famously said it's not his job to worry about the 47% who pay no federal income tax, "unable to take responsibility for themselves". 

Hannity cheered this as right wing staples like Peggy Noonan, David Brooks and Bill Kristol denounced the comments. Even Senator Scott Brown spoke up against the inaccuracies while noted "theo-cons" like Rusty Reno and Rod Drier quickly spoke out from the religious right. 

- Advertisement -

In the full tape, Romney admitted he would not pursue government corruption. He admitted he had no intention to further Israeli-Palestinian peace. He insulted Hispanics and swing voters, but Hannity selectively ignored these and all the many other topics that afternoon. Romney's 'dirty bomb' gaffe was headline news on cable by evening, so it was even more strange that Hannity blanket-endorsed everything said on the tape. 

The one thing Hannity took exception with was Romney's disbelief that half the country would still vote for him "if given the opportunity". If given the opportunity? Is that assuming they are not disenfranchised by Karl Rove or Florida election officials

- Advertisement -

Mitt Sucking Hard on Government Teat

Romney was jeered for weeks for misstating the composition of the 47% of Americans who do not pay any federal income tax, often retirees, veterans, the disabled or full-time workers with legitimate deductions like a big family, an adoption or student debt. In large part, the working poor struggling to stay off assistance, the heart of the electorate.

Mitt's verbal "inelegance" came as he mixed in hardworking folks with lazy welfare scammers, certainly a much smaller number. Paul Ryan lowered this "Mittscalculation" to 30% within two weeks. Called a "vulture" by Republican primary opponents, Romney surely was himself a trailblazing tax evader for decades. This breaking report shows Romney secretly "rented" his church's tax exempt status using a now-prohibited loophole.

But another damning video has resurfaced, glossed over during the primaries when Romney was getting 25% of the vote. Filmed surreptitiously in 2002 during his run for governor in Massachussetts, Mitt eagerly unpacks his secret agenda to use "personal associations" to get millions out of "every department, every agency" of government using grants, contracts and funding for "projects". (ABC News, Raw Story)

Hear Romney brag about being the corporate welfare king, describing how large and "creative" his government hand outs got:

- Advertisement -

Romney Confesses His Original Comments "Completely Wrong"

Finally, after weeks of doubling down on Romney's "47%" comments, Hannity's own exclusive TV interview with Romney revealed the claims made on the tape were "completely wrong", ending the debate once and for all. 

To this day, Hannity has not offered his own retraction, confident his listeners will tune in again and again, but how many even remember what Hannity said just one month ago? 

How many listeners recall Hannity's insistence we must invade Iraq because they were going to attack us with WMD? Is there any price to pay for being so dead wrong?

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3


- Advertisement -

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It


(OpEdNews Contributing Editor since October 2006) Inner city schoolteacher from New York, mostly covering media manipulation. I put election/finance reform ahead of all issues but also advocate for fiscal conservatism, ethics in journalism and (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon Share Author on Social Media   Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Limbaugh/Hannity Parent Company Admits Hiring Actors to Call Radio Shows

The #OWS Video Rupert Murdoch Doesn't Want You To See

LocalLeaks' Charges of Cover-Up by Parents, Police in Steubenville Rape Forces Official Response [Updated]

Limbaugh, Hannity, Beck Respond To Report That Parent Company Hires Actors for Call-ins

#OWS Cheers As Defiant Judge Stops Obama From Selling Immunity To Wall Street

Obama to Grant Banks Robosigning Immunity in Showdown With Breakaway AGs [Updated]