Power of Story Send a Tweet        

Share on Google Plus 1 Share on Twitter 1 Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend (2 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   7 comments
OpEdNews Op Eds

HYPOCRISY: The Paradoxes of a Pied-Eyed Piper

By       Message Em Sos     Permalink

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 2   Supported 2   Well Said 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 4/22/18

Author 509442
Become a Fan
  (3 fans)


(Image by Wikipedia)   Permission   Details   DMCA
- Advertisement -

Please see below essay, selected snippets, with side comments of levity, for the sake of sanity, rather than from any malice; the UN Charter:

The UN officially came into existence... upon ratification of the United Nations Charter by the five permanent members of the Security Council--France, the Republic of China (the breakaway island of Taiwan), the Soviet Union (defunct), the United Kingdom and the United States, and by... wait for it, a majority of the other 46 signatories. Ha! Ha! Ha! With a wink and a nod.

- Advertisement -

The UN is the international institutional expression of the ultimate fraudulent distribution of power among the nations of the world. Those countries with the might have the right to say what goes, either by accepting or rejecting predetermined policy.

The Security Council, whose five founding permanent-member states possess -- determined arbitrarily by themselves to directly protect their own interests -- unchallengeable authority. They "cannot be held accountable by those other member states who have no say (currently 189), because they are the ones -- the majority, who do not" wield this 'necessary' direct power veto.

- Advertisement -

What does this tell us about the notion of real democracy?

"(W)ho guards the guards?" Those who write the history get to factually specify what it is!

The Security Council then, by definition, is a tyranny of a minority over the global commons of nation states.

Which country predominates in this body and has unchallengeable veto power to rule the roost!

- Advertisement -

After this inexorably drawn-out moment (73 years) of actual history, it is plainly obvious which hegemonic state this is; begging the question.

The neo-liberal laissez-faire structured form of capitalism, dominant in the US, and which plays by the politics of "take-no-prisoners", contributes 25% of the UN budget.

This is the precise model upon which the US electoral system itself operates since its inception. Those who control the purse strings have the final authority. All 'others' are coerced, by way of this heavily veiled historical mechanism, to kowtow to the diktats of money power, backed by the unilateral might of the most intransigent military-techno-industrial complex the world has ever had to face.

(Our) way or the highway is an idiom that comes to mind. It may as well be their motto! Or, on a personal level, they are prone to say "if you don't like it, why don't you just go back to where you came from."

It is by such methods of control that the US usurped political 'leadership'. This is the way hierarchies conduct business whatever the designated 'business' is. When it comes to the killing and/or maiming of innocents, the US is definitely the leader! No other country comes close.

Can there be conscience without wisdom? Only a child acts without forethought. And if the child does not mature s/he ends up being a sociopath, believing that he who pays the piper calls the tune.

The errant belief is that being the largest contributor, the US should call the tune.

This subjective US rule of "he who pays the piper calls the tune" is nothing less than a despicable (de)mockery of the very ideal upon which the US supposedly was founded. This policy, ever since the constitutional founding of the United States of America, has been spread worldwide in this manner, and therefore, is an utter fraud, both domestically and globally. If the expression laughing-stock ever penetrates the greater American conscience (or lack thereof) before it really is too late, the domestic mass public too, will consciously know and be horrified at how we have been had.

The tragedy is that the greatest threat to international peace is facilitated by the one major international body of oversight, purportedly established to unify the nations of the world.

However, being based on a premeditated conspiracy of a minority -- the five charter-member countries -- how likely is this to come to fruition?

Being rigged in favor of root power it is a totally undemocratic institution.

Conspiracy derives from undemocratic collusion, even if unwitting.

The UN Charter:

Introductory Note

The Charter of the United Nations was signed on 26 June 1945, in San Francisco, at the conclusion of the United Nations Conference on International Organization and came into force on 24 October 1945. The Statute of the International Court of Justice is an integral part of the Charter. True, but without any global peoples' enforcement capacity, utterly useless as a constructive political asset.

Preamble

WE THE PEOPLES OF THE UNITED NATIONS DETERMINED

to save succeeding generations from the scourge of war, which twice in our lifetime has brought untold sorrow to mankind, and

to reaffirm faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person, in the equal rights of men and women and of nations large and small, and

to establish conditions under which justice and respect for the obligations arising from treaties and other sources of international law can be maintained, and

to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom,

AND FOR THESE ENDS

to practice tolerance and live together in peace with one another as good neighbours, and

to unite our strength to maintain international peace and security, and

to ensure, by the acceptance of principles and the institution of methods, that armed force shall not be used, save in the common interest, and

to employ international machinery for the promotion of the economic and social advancement of all peoples,

HAVE RESOLVED TO COMBINE OUR EFFORTS TO ACCOMPLISH THESE AIMS

Accordingly, our respective Governments, through representatives assembled in the city of San Francisco, who have exhibited their full powers found to be in good and due form, have agreed to the present Charter of the United Nations and do hereby establish an international organization to be known as the United Nations.

Notes (Stimulus)

Manifesto for A New World Order by George Monbiot, 2003

 

- Advertisement -

Must Read 2   Supported 2   Well Said 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Free thinking, animate, global subject, as competent as the next humane being, to dialogue on the matter of our species continued survival on mother Earth.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon Share Author on Social Media   Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Mike Whitney's Tom Friedman Paean to a Saudi Tyrant

If Only They Will See: First-Hand Factual Histories' Observations Are Ample Enough Reference.

For 400 Years, Talking and Talking... and Talking

Supremacist Mindset is As Old As White Settlement of the United States Itself

Reply to Congressman Kinzinger

Response to Alon ben Meirs: Gaza --- A Disaster In The Making

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

4 people are discussing this page, with 7 comments


Em Sos

Become a Fan
Author 509442

(Member since Jul 23, 2017), 2 fans, 14 articles, 79 comments


Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


  New Content

This subjective US rule of "he who pays the piper calls the tune" is nothing less than a despicable (de)mockery of the very ideal upon which the US supposedly, was founded. This policy, ever since the constitutional founding of the United States of America, has been spread worldwide in this manner, and therefore, is an utter fraud, both domestically and globally. If the expression laughing-stock ever penetrates the greater American conscience (or lack thereof) before it really is too late, the domestic mass public too, will consciously know and be horrified at how we have been had.

Submitted on Sunday, Apr 22, 2018 at 2:06:29 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 
Indent

BFalcon

Become a Fan
Author 28059

(Member since Dec 20, 2008), 19 fans, 3 articles, 14949 comments


Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Reply to Em Sos:   New Content

The ideal of five winning powers in WWII keeping the piece thereafter was sound. Unfortunately, almost every thug found a protector.

The only chance is restoring justice.

But your writing does not seem to help.

Submitted on Wednesday, Apr 25, 2018 at 6:10:54 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

David Chester

Become a Fan
Author 36712

(Member since Jul 1, 2009), 2 fans, 4 articles, 899 comments


Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


  New Content

I am waiting until the poverty gap in the US becomes so great that the only way the poor can survive is as slaves. They will then have to work terribly hard for what little food and support their masters provide and eventually, due to the reduced demand for consumer goods the monopolists will themselves become sufficiently poor that the slaves can rebel and succeed in building their own society. This scenario has already been played out several times in other parts of the world and in most cases the prior civilization has disappeared with a few exceptions. By studying history and not repeating its failures can the US survive, but it seems to me that it does not have enough sensibility to do this. Bye bye!!.

Submitted on Sunday, Apr 22, 2018 at 3:36:27 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 
Indent

BFalcon

Become a Fan
Author 28059

(Member since Dec 20, 2008), 19 fans, 3 articles, 14949 comments


Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Reply to David Chester:   New Content

Don't hold your breath.

Submitted on Wednesday, Apr 25, 2018 at 6:08:58 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 
Indent

Em Sos

Become a Fan
Author 509442

(Member since Jul 23, 2017), 2 fans, 14 articles, 79 comments


Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Reply to David Chester:   New Content

Yes, the social organization of this world, is, and has been an abiding curiosity of mine for a long time too.

Perhaps you might elaborate, in an OEN article, how your theory, relating to macroeconomics, is to be applied to social organization, when there is such disorganization -- chaos, disharmony -- extant in this world today. Innovation is certainly called for!

Belatedly, I thank you for your comment.

Submitted on Wednesday, Apr 25, 2018 at 7:19:23 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

gunnar kullenberg

Become a Fan
Author 500026

(Member since Sep 30, 2014), 9 fans, 1224 comments


Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


  New Content

...ok...

The location of the UN headquarters also should not be New York...the fact that it is, has caused a lot of outrageous problems...

And no, I don't know where it would be best located...an island somewhere, given special international status somehow...? -- ...the Azores...? -- ..travel might be a bit of a complication, but...such a problem could be overcome...

Submitted on Wednesday, Apr 25, 2018 at 6:27:27 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 
Indent

Em Sos

Become a Fan
Author 509442

(Member since Jul 23, 2017), 2 fans, 14 articles, 79 comments


Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Reply to gunnar kullenberg:   New Content

Okay! As BFalcon above tells me "But your writing does not seem to help" perhaps your reading the book I cited as my Note in my essay, would throw a positive light and be of some assistance in your own thinking on the subject.

Sverige är fortfarande ett av de mer progressiva länderna! Kan vi åtminstone komma överens om detta?

Submitted on Wednesday, Apr 25, 2018 at 7:45:20 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment