Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (1 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   No comments
Sci Tech

Guidant/Boston Scientific Survives Lawsuit for death of 14 month old Infant

By       Message Jim McGookin     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 3 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   Touching 1   Interesting 1  
View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H3 9/14/09

Author 34316
- Advertisement -

St. Joseph County jury rules in favor of device maker
Verdict shocks family of child who died in '05.

Tribune Staff Writer

- Advertisement -

SOUTH BEND -- After a two-week trial, a St. Joseph County jury Tuesday ruled that a medical device maker was not liable in the death of a 14-month-old Walkerton girl.

Samantha McGookin died July 9, 2005, after she stopped breathing at the family's home.

Her mother, Jodi (McGookin) Lillard, her grandparents, Jim and Vicky McGookin, and her father, Julian E. Smith, filed suit in August 2006 against Indianapolis-based Guidant Corp., which designed and manufactured a pacemaker implanted in Samantha when she was 3 days old.

Samantha was born with bradychardia, a heart defect in which the lower chamber of the heart beats slower than the upper chamber.

- Advertisement -

The suit alleged that Guidant, which has since been acquired by Boston Scientific Corp., had not adequately tested the pacemaker for use in young children, the company knew it was subject to failure, and it had a duty to notify the family of that risk.

But Boston Scientific's lawyers disputed those allegations, arguing that the McGookins could not prove its conduct had caused Samantha's pacemaker to fail, and that the company had adequately notified Samantha's doctors of risks and limitations with device labeling.

The jury deliberated for about nine hours.

After St. Joseph Superior Court Judge Michael Scopelitis read the verdicts, the McGookins looked shocked. They sat silently and gave no reaction.

"I don't know what to say," their lead attorney, Spence Walton Jr., said quietly to the family. "I'm sorry."

The jury had to sort through mounds of evidence and make sense of complex expert testimony on the Food and Drug Administration's medical device approval process.

"This is the most complex case I've tried in my nine years as a judge," Scopelitis told the parties after dismissing the jury. "I know the jury really worked hard and struggled with this. I could see it in their faces."

- Advertisement -

On the courthouse steps, Jodi Lillard finally began crying in her husband's arms.

"I can't believe it," she said. "I can't believe they sat through two weeks of trial with the information we got and they still came back with a verdict for the defendant. I don't understand."

Lillard said she had been very confident in their chances.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3


- Advertisement -

Must Read 1   Touching 1   Interesting 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

My granddaughter, Samantha, had a Guidant pacemaker implanted in her when she was three days old. She was just 14 months and 12 days old when her pacemaker failed and killed her. Guidant and companies that manufacture life saving devices need to (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
/* The Petition Site */
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Guidant/Boston Scientific Survives Lawsuit for death of 14 month old Infant

Medical Devices effect on Health Care Reform