Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 1 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds    H4'ed 3/4/17

Guaranteed Basic Income goes Mainstream

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)     (# of views)   9 comments
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Josh Mitteldorf
Become a Fan
  (43 fans)

(Image by Muon (Hungary))   Details   DMCA
- Advertisement -
Our present version of capitalism forces a majority of people into working at jobs they don't want to do, often jobs that make them sick, jobs that sap their creativity, limit their freedom to pursue projects that genuinely inspire them.

We keep people motivated to work by making unemployment a fearful, desperate condition. We assume that this is what is necessary to motivate the masses because they are inherently lazy and because much work needs to be done in order to guarantee our basic collective needs.

These assumptions are wrong. People are not intrinsically lazy--only averse to the degrading treatment that employment implies. And enormous productivity gains over the last century assure that we can all be fed, clothed, and housed with a fraction of the aggregate labor that we are all performing.

The great majority of work that Americans do today is participation in a zero sum game:

  • Marketers trying to gain share for their company at the expense of another company.
  • Lawyers arguing for one side of a case, opposed by lawyers fighting for the other side.
  • Advocates trying to direct government funds to public goods, and lobbyists trying to divert government funds to benefit their clients.
  • Marketing of addictive foods, alcohol and tobacco, and medical services for the people made sick by addictive foods, alcohol and tobacco.
  • Desperate people trying to cheat in one way or another, and security systems that make cheating more difficult.

    - Advertisement -
  • Much of the rest of the work that capitalism demands of us is about creating demand for products that people didn't know they wanted, and then filling that demand.

    And so I get excited when I see the New York Times advocating an idea that has so much good sense behind it, so much capacity to transform the structure of our society and enhance our quality of life. Making people's basic needs a human right was proposed by Eleanor Roosevelt 70 years ago when it was already possible, before the vast increases in productivity that came with the computer age.

    This single proposal will free up an enormous wellspring of human creativity, while removing a burden of crime, violence, addiction and imprisonment that weighs down our commonwealth.

    ----------------------------------

    - Advertisement -

    There's a back-story behind this situation that helps us understand the basic contradictions in the version of capitalism that we have come to accept as a condition of life. There are no shortages of goods, no shortages of people that need employment or of meaningful work that needs to be done. But there is a shortage of money--little, symbolic slips of paper that are supposed to be lubricating the economy, but instead are paralyzing it. Central banks keep money in short supply. I cannot help suspecting it is for their own benefit, but whatever the reason, there is no justification for the privatization of the money supply. Our Constitution, in fact, assigns to Congress the power to create money and regulate its flow into the economy.

    Modern facts call for an economy of plenty. Nowadays, who would dare say that the world production is unable to feed, clothe and shelter all of mankind?
    The world has entered into an era of plenty: an abundance that already exists or that can be made available at a moment's notice. There is a surplus of manpower required for the production of the goods needed to sustain our temporal life.
    If abundance does not reign in the homes, it is because it is destroyed on purpose. It is held back. Large numbers of workers are kept unemployed. Production is impeded. It is sabotaged.
    --Louis Even, 1941

     

    - Advertisement -

    Must Read 5   Well Said 4   Valuable 3  
    Rate It | View Ratings

    Josh Mitteldorf Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


    Josh Mitteldorf, a senior editor at OpEdNews, blogs on aging at http://JoshMitteldorf.ScienceBlog.com. Read how to stay young at http://AgingAdvice.org.
    Educated to be an astrophysicist, he has branched out from there to mathematical (more...)
     

    Go To Commenting
    The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
    Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines
    Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
    Support OpEdNews

    OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

    If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

    STAY IN THE KNOW
    If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
    Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
    Name
    Email
       (Opens new browser window)
     

    Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

    Twitter Bans The Donald

    Artificial Earthquakes

    Cold Fusion: Tangible Hope in an Age of Despair

    New Scientific Study: Smoking Gun Evidence of 9/11 Explosives in WTC Dust

    PayPal cuts off Bradley Manning Legal Defense; Backs Off under Grass Roots Pressure