Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 17 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 2/25/16

Guantanamo Bay is only the symptom of a sickness: indefinite detention

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)   1 comment
Message Trevor Timm
Become a Fan
  (2 fans)

Reprinted from The Guardian

President Obama wants to close Guantanamo. But unless he ends the policy of indefinite detention, its shameful spirit will live on
Obama Rolls Out Plan To Close Guantanamo Prison
Obama Rolls Out Plan To Close Guantanamo Prison
(Image by The Young Turks, Channel: TheYoungTurks)
  Details   DMCA

Guantanamo has been a pockmark on our society ever since it opened. The detention facility itself is a human rights abomination, but it's not just the physical center that is a problem -- it is the spirit it embodies. The policy of indefinite detention in Gitmo makes a mockery of the US constitution. That's why, as Barack Obama makes his latest impassioned and forceful plea to close it once and for all, it is shameful that he is leaving in place the practices that enabled it to flourish in the first place.

It's unlikely that Guantanamo will actually be closed by the time Obama leaves office, given the half measures and hesitations in his first term that allowed Congress to throw up legal roadblocks to transferring prisoners to the US. But, even if Obama succeeds, that won't be the end of this dark chapter in US history. As long as the unconstitutional policy of indefinite detention and the disastrous military commissions remain, so too will the stain on America's reputation.

Indefinite detention -- holding detainees for what is now decades with no trial or even charges of any kind on the horizon -- is about as antithetical to American values and the constitution as it gets. There are dozens of detainees that are cleared for release now -- and have been cleared for release for years -- that still remain behind bars on the US military base in Cuba. But there are dozens more that the US considers "unfit for trial" but "too dangerous to release." (Many of them can't be tried because the US tortured them.)

Obama made clear at the end of his remarks that indefinite detention remains US policy. As long as the post-9/11 Authorization for Military Force (AUMF) remains active, the US government acts like it can hold these prisoners forever. And as the administration now claims the bill is the legal authority that lets it bomb Syria, Iraq and now Libya -- fighting a terrorist organization that did not exist on 9/11 and for which there is no end -- there is virtually no chance of the legislation being repealed this decade. These prisoners possibly face spending the rest of their lives in jail without seeing trial.

As for the rest of the prisoners who can and should face trial, they remain marred in the disastrous military commissions trial system, which has been plagued with problem after problem for more than a decade. This has left them all but unworkable, and in many cases, unconstitutional. The president, while criticizing the military commissions and explaining how normal federal courts are much more effective in actually trying terrorists, remains stubbornly insistent that the commissions can still work -- as long as Congress alters them yet again.

How Obama is going to get a Republican-controlled Congress to pass anything in this election year he did not explain, but it sounds like just as big of a fantasy as getting a new US supreme court nominee through the Senate in the same time frame. The military commissions should've been scrapped years ago, and will continue to haunt whatever administration is voted into office this November.

Click Here to Read Whole Article

Must Read 1   Valuable 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Trevor Timm Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Trevor Timm is a co-founder and the executive director of the Freedom of the Press Foundation. He is a writer, activist, and lawyer who specializes in free speech and government transparency issues. He has contributed to  The (more...)

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Sen. Dianne Feinstein's New NSA Bill Will Codify and Extend Mass Surveillance of Americans

Everyone loves Bernie Sanders. Except, it seems, the Democratic party

DOJ Investigation of AP Part of Larger Pattern to Intimidate Sources and Reporters

If Trump leaks are OK and Clinton leaks aren't, there's a problem

Why the Panama Papers should be a US election issue

One good thing about Donald Trump's campaign: it's ruining Jeb Bush's

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend