Power of Story Send a Tweet        
OpEdNews Op Eds

Ghailani Verdict Proves Civilian Trials Fair, Safe, and Effective

By   Follow Me on Twitter     Message Kevin Gosztola       (Page 1 of 4 pages)     Permalink

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 11/19/10

Author 7416
Become a Fan
  (66 fans)
- Advertisement -


Former Guantanamo detainee and "terror suspect" Ahmed Ghailani was found guilty of conspiracy for the role he played in the 1998 bombings of U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania. Ghailani, who had been charged with 285 counts was acquitted on all counts except the count of conspiracy. 


Ghailani was the first Guantanamo detainee to be tried in the federal justice system. His trial and, in many ways, the outcome of his trial was a victory for advocates who had been suggesting that civilian trials should be utilized instead of military commissions.

- Advertisement -


The Director of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) National Security Project released this statement on Ghailani's conviction:

"This case should put to rest any unfounded fears that our federal justice system cannot conduct fair, safe and effective trials in terrorism cases. The jury heard the evidence and delivered a verdict that, unlike military commissions trials, we can trust. We should be proud of a system that isn't set up to simply rubberstamp the government's case no matter how little reliable evidence there may be. Federal courts are not only the right place but the most effective place to prosecute terrorism suspects."

- Advertisement -


The Center for Constitutional Rights, which has led many legal battles over Guantanamo throughout the past eight years, were less celebratory


"CCR questions the ability of anyone who is Muslim to receive a truly fair trial in any American judicial forum post-9/11.  Both the military commission system and federal criminal trials have serious flaws.  However, on balance the Ghailani verdict shows that federal criminal trials are far superior to military commissions for the simple yet fundamental reason that they prohibit evidence obtained by torture.  If anyone is unsatisfied with Ghailani's acquittal on 284 counts, they should blame the CIA agents who tortured him."


Yet, their statement indicated a level of satisfaction: evidence obtained by torture was not allowed to be used against Ghailani during his trial. 

- Advertisement -


Juan Cole, who blogs at Informed Comment, briefly recapped how "Ghailani was waterboarded, i.e. tortured, into revealing his relationship with Hussein Abebe, who in turn provided the most damaging testimony against Ghailani.":


Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4


- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It


Kevin Gosztola is managing editor of Shadowproof Press. He also produces and co-hosts the weekly podcast, "Unauthorized Disclosure." He was an editor for OpEdNews.com

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon Share Author on Social Media   Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

We Do Not Consent to Warrantless "Porno-Scanning" in Airports

Do They Put Lipstick on Pigs at the Funny Farm?

How Private Prison Corporations Hope Arizona's SB1070 Will Lead to Internment Camps for Illegals

Why the Battle Against TSA Groping and Body Scanners is Justified

Give Obama a Chance to Do What?