Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 18 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 6/29/09

Geonomics: what ever happened to the movement Henry George started?

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)   No comments
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Scott Baker
Become a Fan
  (79 fans)
Henry George, in his classic, and best-selling economics book of all time, Progress and Poverty, which sold 2 million copies in its first year - 1879 - laid out the remedy to end poverty AND spur growth and prosperity.  By taxing natural resources and untaxing wages and capital (real capital such as trucks, ships, cranes etc.), one would return more than enough money to the community, via taxes, while still allowing honest entrepreneurs and laborers to earn a living.  In short, there IS a free lunch.

See my previous articles on Geonomics for more detail:
Geonomics and the true cost of poverty
A new form of Capitalism: Geonomics
A new form of capitalism is needed: Geonomics
or any of a vast number of articles on Georgism or Geonomics available on the Web.

George nearly won the NYC mayoral election, twice; his son came in third the second time when George died prematurely at 58 in 1897. The first time, he came in second while Tammany Hall installed its hand-picked candidate, and beat a young up-and-comer, Teddy Roosevelt.

Still, George's ideas were broadly adopted, not only here, but world-wide, especially in the early part of the 20th century. They worked, and continue to work, in somewhat attenuated form, in Norway - where oil revenues are returned to the people, who have a higher per capita living standard than Americans; in Pittsburgh, whose renaissance building boom was fueled by a land value tax; in Detroit, where there was practically nothing to tax but land, until the automakers firmly established themselves, and the politicians lost their way and started taxing wages and capital (exactly the wrong approach in Motown) etc.

So, is that is then? Does Georgism, now Geonomics, contain a fatal flaw, one that allows it to lift communities off the ground, but then withers away, like its founder?  No, the answer is more complex than that, and has to do with the enduring power of monopolists to re-frame the debate, even the very terms of the debate - something even George lived to rail against in his final, slightly unfinished book, The Science of Political Economy (an abridged version can be found online or ordered by clicking on the link).

Remember who is giving money to the universities, who sit on subsidized land.  It is the wealthy donors, who inevitably got that way by having some sort of resource monopoly - land, oil (John D. Rockefeller), steel (Andrew Carnegie), railroads (William Vanderbilt) etc. - who frame, or re-frame the economic debate.  Do you think they want to hear George's message that the land and other natural resources they grew wealthy upon were really stolen from the people?  Not likely.  They're not called Robber Barons for nothing.  For more about how Georgism was sidelined, read Professor Mason Gaffney's excellent article, The Corruption of Economics.

Fortunately, all is not lost for Georgism, and a number of Henry George schools continue to flourish, including the one I just completed a year in, here in New York City.  They had 1,000 students this year!
As the Dean pointed out in his closing speech at commencement last week, "Humanity is not in its 11th hour, it is in its 13th hour." 

Indeed so.  If we do not find a way to curb our resource appetites and simultaneously to discover new, less resource-intensive forms of energy production, less polluting forms of food production, ways of producing less waste or truly recycling it (instead of just downcycling it, as we do now), we will sink into our own muck.
Scientists and economists (even the corrupt ones who don't really understand what's wrong with their Chicago School capitalist model) have been warning us for some time that we are on an unsustainable course.  Soon, already in some places, nature will slap us upside the head for our willful ignorance.  Geonomics provides the answer to both the economic impossibility of fueling society by producing ever increasing amounts of debt, while simultaneously increasing our debt to nature.

Time is running out.  Will humanity rise to the challenge?
Must Read 1   Well Said 1   Supported 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Scott Baker Social Media Pages: Facebook Page       Twitter Page       Linked In Page       Instagram Page

Scott Baker is a Managing Editor & The Economics Editor at Opednews, and a former blogger for Huffington Post, Daily Kos, and Global Economic Intersection.

His anthology of updated Opednews articles "America is Not Broke" was published by Tayen Lane Publishing (March, 2015) and may be found here:

Scott is a former and current President of Common Ground-NY (, a Geoist/Georgist activist group. He has written dozens of (more...)

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Obama Explains the FEMA Camps

Was Malaysian Flight MH370 Landed Safely in Afghanistan?

Let the Sun Shine on a State Bank in Florida

Batman, The Dark Knight Rises...and Occupy Wall Street Falls

The Least Productive People in the World

Detroit is Not Broke!

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend